Occasionally, CNET gives fair reviews, but they haven't been giving fair ones lately.
OH COME ON! Seriously I am as big a fan of OSX and macs in general as many here, but that quote just sounds like a whining twelve year old.
Snow Leopard is a service pack, its changing a fair amount of under the hood architecture for the future, but does not revolutionise the OSX operating system or the user experience by any stretch of the imagination.
The list of applications currently not working with Snow Leopard is astoundingly high and personally I have never seen as many inexplicable errors as I see on my snow leopard mac pro. Yes that includes using Windows ME all those years ago!
The features/hype in Apple's marketing for SL is ridiculously inflated. Most users will not be running a 64bit kernel, will be able to run 64bit apps WHEN they become available, and will dance a little samba around all the peripherals that may not work. The Marble effects are very limited and if I had to name one single thing that I have seen in a few weeks in using SL that is a benefit, it would be the folder browsing in stacks. Worth 29 bucks ..... barely!
My advice to everyone who is not using rendering or some other CPU intensive task that takes hours is simply wait. Upgrade to SL when something more tangible will be noticeable from your upgrade. After 3 weeks of use, I am downgrading back to Leopard as I type because there are significantly more issues with applications and hardware than there are benefits.
Thus if anything CNET got it about right, or were maybe even a little generous