Newer is not necessarily better, especially regarding display comfort and safety. Beware of any MacBook Pros with mini-LED XDR screens. There are a multitude of reports from people (including me) who developed visual sensitivities, beginning when they started using these machines. Considering the underlying technology of how these screens are backlit (numerous āzonesā flickering at different frequencies simultaneously), IMHO they are not a good fit for text/productivity work. Blaring whites next to pitch black darks (high contrast) can be rough on the eyes.
The LCD-based Macbook Airs (with notches) also seem to bother some people, although Iām not sure why. The 13-inch MacBook Pros with touchbars, along with the 13-inch M1 MacBook Air (no notch), seem to be the last comfortable MacBook screens for productivity (for affected individuals, and those who could be affected). These machines are still available factory refurbished. Alternatively, as others mentioned, there are still viable Intel-based MacBooks available.
Same goes for iMacs: the 2009-2014 standard 1440p 2K displays were a pleasure to use (the 27" Thundrbolt monitors had the same resolution), but the Retinas that followed were too harsh for many, and the XDRs from 2019+ are even worse. The human eyeball is not mounted on a platform evolved to stoop on field-mice from a thousand feet up, and your body lets you know when it's being subjected to the visual equivalent of thrash-metal.
As a prof you should know better than to assume that what worked in 2023 will be appropriate in 2027+, which is the time frame specified by the OP. Even if you are teaching LA courses (which I do not denigrate) you should read up on Apple's [superb] Unified Memory Architecture and also on where AI seems to be going.
Apple gives us a hint as to where things are going with the fact that today's MBP max is 128 GB RAM. Mac OS and apps RAM needs have increased every year for 40 years now.
Allen, if the *professor*
teaching the classes doesn't use or need or expect 128gb ram (
not storage) or even an eighth of that in his own personal computer, I'm not seeing a rational argument for suggesting that he tell
his students to bring in thousand-dollar high-end platforms. We're in an economic phase right now where these things are
massively overpriced versus the
needs required of them. You do not a dragster to get the groceries, and you do not need portable teraFLOPS to type, browse, calculate, or watch x265 rips.
Kids shouldn't buy high-end computers for the same (multiple) reasons they shouldn't buy new cars: huge upfront expense for
subjectively minor performance differences, eye-melting warranty premiums, OEM blatant artificial-obsolescence mentality expressed in both OS software
and hardware (witness
Apple's relentless hostility toward "right to repair"), and
shameless data-harvesting -- all of which subsequently means prices of new models to crater precipitously in increasingly short periods of time. OTOH, you find an immaculate pre-butterfly MBP for $150 and drop in the pool, oh well, you're only out 150.
New buyers should plan accordingly, for the future.
The future being what, four years down the road after the extended-warranty has expired, the shipped-with OS is no longer officially supported, and the impossible-to-repair-or-transfer soldered-on components are failing?
This "evil-big-tech" phase is, of course, unsustainable. In the meantime, avoid their new offerings while awaiting corporate ethical adjustment...or replacement.