Again, this is flat out wrong! Show me somewhere where this is stated by the carrier. It's easy to make wild statements without supported evidence.....watch: the $20 subsidy actually went up to $25 when AT&T launched the mobile share plans!!!!!
The $130 you pay per month on the 4gb data share plan is for the SERVICE and has nothing to do with the phone. Just because you and others think there is a hidden subsidy does not make it true and should not factor into the discussion. You pay extra for AT&T and Verizon because they have a superior network and that costs money!!!
Even if I gave you the benefit of the doubt and said the big two did take possible phone subsidies into consideration when they priced out their plans then you would be kidding yourself if you didn't think t-mobile did that as well!
You t-mobile folks get so upset when other carriers come out with other options why don't you just stick with your crappy coverage and quit crying. It almost seems like you are looking for a reason to jump but because the big two won't stoop to t-mobiles level youre always disappointed!
Even if I gave you the benefit of the doubt and said the big two did take possible phone subsidies into consideration when they priced out their plans then you would be kidding yourself if you didn't think t-mobile did that as well!
at this point you aren't going to see much value upgrading every year. and probably every 2 years as well
Whoever wrote the Verge article is completely misinformed. I have purchased both the iPhone 3GS and the iPhone 5 from AT&T at the subsidized price after signing up for a 2-year contract. I have never had a $20 monthly device payment on my bill. The phone price is dropped because you are signing up to be stuck with AT&T for 2 years. That's what subsidized means. Otherwise it would simply be labeled as an installment payment plan. The idea that AT&T has "traditionally" charged for this is completely bogus.
I have a feeling that these ripoff plans might end up being the only option someday.
I guess this stuff is up to the individual but the best I can tell with my Verizon, a smart phone is gonna cost you 40.00 a month plus whatever data plan you chose to share.
Why in the world would I pay full price for my iPhone when I can get it for 199.00?
Total ripoff... They should let everyone upgrade once a year at no additional cost, the only stipulation is to trade your handset in...
Yes, they should. Their current pricing for service is already stupid high with the built in subsidy. I pay $233/month for 3 phones and 2 ipad's on 10GB data share... If I move to t-mobile I could likely save about $1000/year due to their plans NOT having built in subsidies. So yeah, my comment stands.So they should take a used handset in exchange for a new one for free?
the phones are not free. They money you pay is not broken down. That not stated by the carriers, just more common sense. Not hard to do the math.Again, this is flat out wrong! Show me somewhere where this is stated by the carrier. It's easy to make wild statements without supported evidence.....watch: the $20 subsidy actually went up to $25 when AT&T launched the mobile share plans!!!!!
The $130 you pay per month on the 4gb data share plan is for the SERVICE and has nothing to do with the phone. Just because you and others think there is a hidden subsidy does not make it true and should not factor into the discussion. You pay extra for AT&T and Verizon because they have a superior network and that costs money!!!
Even if I gave you the benefit of the doubt and said the big two did take possible phone subsidies into consideration when they priced out their plans then you would be kidding yourself if you didn't think t-mobile did that as well!
You t-mobile folks get so upset when other carriers come out with other options why don't you just stick with your crappy coverage and quit crying. It almost seems like you are looking for a reason to jump but because the big two won't stoop to t-mobiles level youre always disappointed!
Buy your own phone and just pay as you go. ATT has new plans for smartphones that look like what contract prices would be without the phone subsidy.
http://www.att.com/shop/wireless/plans/prepaidplans.html
Yes, they should. Their current pricing for service is already stupid high with the built in subsidy. I pay $233/month for 3 phones and 2 ipad's on 10GB data share... If I move to t-mobile I could likely save about $1000/year due to their plans NOT having built in subsidies. So yeah, my comment stands.
Prepaid plans are way cheaper and sometimes use the same networks.
Actually, as they are publicly traded companies, we ARE privy to their costs. Go read their quarterly results where their profits have been increasing. I'm too lazy to link for you.As to the rip-off nature of these plans as some have put it, we are not privy to the full cost accounting of what is spent to provide us service, so we do not know the cost basis of our rate plains. We must just decide if we feel that we are receiving an equal value for our service to it's cost. For me, the positive values of Verizon makes it worth the (higher) cost. Same thing with the Edge plan.
And, as it is, AT&T has no built-in subsidy in their service plans. The service price is the same whether you have a contract or not. The subsidy is promising to be a revenue stream for them for two years. People need to stop making up arbitrary numbers and look at it for what it is.
Buy your own phone and just pay as you go. ATT has new plans for smartphones that look like what contract prices would be without the phone subsidy.
http://www.att.com/shop/wireless/plans/prepaidplans.html