MacOS has better privacy handling. End of.
That it performs better is just a thick layer of icing.
That it performs better is just a thick layer of icing.
I should think soDisco keys?
Most notably, the M1 MacBook Pro runs macOS Big Sur and the Razer Book 13 runs Windows, and ecosystem is probably the biggest consideration when choosing between these machines. Those who are deep in Apple's ecosystem will get more use out of the M1 MacBook Pro, while those who rely on Windows software would prefer the Razer Book 13.
Jesus....people...you are using an OS that is 5 years old....also the dark mode in windows is a joke..
nobody, until Microsoft puts its assss together should buy a windows machine , ofc only those who are stuck on windows
Um yes maybe for you, but non of the software I depend my career on is available for Mac OS along with most of the people I know. (And I work in a creative industry).laptops that rely on windows for an OS are a colossal waste of money IMO. i prefer windows in a desktop environment, but i've never found a windows laptop to be worth the time of day
Going to be interesting how they respondSignificantly embarrassing for Intel. So much so that it a major investor now wants to carve it up.
If you don’t mind a hub, Anker has a couple. I picked up a ~13 port one off Amazon: 3 USB-A, 2 USB-Cs, 2 HDMI, Display port, Ethernet, card readers, pass through charging etc. it’s great for home/office use.Sure looks handy to have a USB-A port built in for the myriad of older connections, peripherals and thumb drives out there that many of use - daily.
That is the ultimate decider, as the article rightly pointed out. While the M1 represents the future for Apple, for some of us it currently is not an option due to the inability to run Windows either natively via Bootcamp or in a VM. I , for example, do some work for clients in PowerBI and there simply is no MacOS equivalent to the Windows desktop version, so I need to be able to run Windows. If I switched to an M1 based Mac I'd be forced to buy a second Windows machine; while currently my Parallels VM is just as fast as a Windows laptop with a mid their Ryzen chip, so there is no advantage, and a number of disadvantages, to having a second machine. However, once the Apple Silicon machines can run Windows, with a VM most likely based on what is in beta, Apple Silicon becomes a compelling choice over an Intel based machine. Of course, that also is predicated on Microsoft being serious about the Surface and turning Arm based Windows into an OS that runs the same stuff the x86 version does.While these are fun, it does come down to one runs MacOS, the other doesn’t.
End of discussion.
Why do thinner bezels "win out"? Have you not been following the design changes in cell phones for the last 10 years? Little to no bezels is the goal. Do you not strive for a completely bezel-less phone? Seems obvious.
True, but the first time you go off road you'll appreciate what a Subaru brings to table, especially when you see the Porsche's repair bill...That’s like comparing a “Subaru” Razer to an elegant “Porsche” M1”
Not exactly sure what you're talking about.Optical illusion: when you read the paragraph "Apple's MacBook Pro also has better battery life..", the MB Pro in the photo right above seems to be eternally shrinking.
They already made phones that had screen that rounded the edges. Usability was tough because you are always holding the touch screen. A little non screen for holding the touch device seems like a good trade off.Why do thinner bezels "win out"? Have you not been following the design changes in cell phones for the last 10 years? Little to no bezels is the goal. Do you not strive for a completely bezel-less phone? Seems obvious.
Well... I'm far from an expert as my wife gave me the software for Christmas. With that said, I have the graphics sliders set as shown an was getting 30-40 fps in the air with scenery, cars, etc. Seems usable for an entry level laptop.
View attachment 1707626