It is a technical reason. Mini-display can be easily converted to USB-C because they use nearly the same protocol for video and data transmission. The same can't be said for converting mini-display port to HDMI as the two speak two very different languages.
Yup, from what I've read, there needs to be an "effort" made to turn HDMI into Mini-DisplayPort, that's why these adapters have these converter boxes. But HDMI also transports sound normally, so I expected the volume controls to work at least. The volume controls should work through the USB cable that goes from the Cinema Display to the Mac mini anyway.
But today I tried using the Magic Keyboard (it's an older one, first generation I believe) and when you press the volume buttons, the picture on the screen becomes laggy as well and starts flashing (so the same as when I change the volume on the wired Apple keyboard).
I don't even understand what these volume controls have to do with HDMI or the Display. I guess it's passed there somehow. You'd think it goes over the USB cable, but nope.
But in the end, I'm still not sure if it's technical limitations. I could imagine these converters are just bad. So I thought I'd buy all the ones I come across, maybe one will be the right one.
MacOs Monterey officially dropped support for controlling brightness and volume of the Cinema Display via keyboard, because Apple considers it a "vintage" product. I am sorry, but this is how it is. If you want to better understand the problem and its solution you can have a look at
this thread on the official Apple Community support forum.
In any case after you install one of the many apps that allows you to do so it-just-works, and you quickly forget about that. Try
MonitorControl or
QuickShade.
This is one of the very few cases in which a third party app completely solves a problem created by Apple dropping support for vintage products of functions, so you should be happy! 🤣
Okay, this is the most absurd thing I've heard. It really does make Apple look like gangsters. Is this a company or are these criminals? This display cost 1000 € back then, I just spent over 3000 € on a Mac, and now I can't use my Display properly. 🤣 There's just one word that comes to my mind: It starts with A and ends with E!
That is absolutely catastrophic. So basically if I'd like to use the Display I will HAVE to install third party software. Which I absolutely do not want. I don't know who made these apps and what they do in the background. My computer is very sensible, I can't just install random stuff.
I think I'm literally going to sue them over the state's consumer protection bureau. It's free anyway and there's no risk. Because that sounds like they're purposely making things unusable, that's an illegal practice in the European Union. Just watched something about it today. So they're basically making an effort, to make something unusable, which is perfectly fine otherwise. Of course they'd like me to buy that new Studio Display, and of course I'd love to, but I just don't have the money, so now they've got an angry customer instead. Bad marketing …
As said before, you can't. Or maybe you can by using various adapters put together, but it is NOT the ideal solution as it will not perform at 100% of its potential.
I have to say, resolution wise, everything is fine with this HDMI to mDP cable. Everything looks very nice. Everything is flowing. I do feel like it's at 100%, it's just the brightness/volume thing that makes it glitch. And there's some delay in the display waking up when you wake up the Mac.
But otherwise, I don't feel any lag or anything in that direction. I haven't done intense video editing, so it may be different in that case (HDMI is still almost 50 Gb/s as far as I know. So any difference would be un-feelable in most cases I guess).
If I get that working, this IS the ideal solution imo!
Absolutely no, Ethernet is for network connection only, no video output/input there.
Alright, I had read something in that direction, so I wasn't sure. 😅
Let me ask you this:
- What do you need four ports for at a maximum speed of 40Gbps?
- Are you really sure you can't use one of the four Thunderbolt ports of your Mac Mini M2 Pro to connect the cinema display? I understand that you need them to connect external storage, but you have 3x more ports at full 40Gbps plus 2x USB-A at 10Gbps, which are more than enough even for extreme video editing tasks.
I would suggest you to get one of the many Mini-Display Port → USB-C adapters (which are already tested for your use-case and work perfectly) and test that yourself. If you will ever need other ports, you will eventually get a Thunderbolt dock.
I need those ports for external storage and I want to get the full bandwidth that Thunderbolt allows you to reach. The thing is, these ports share that maximum bandwidth of 40 Gb/s. And there's 4 ports, but actually there's 2 Thunderbolt controllers in total (one behind two ports). I want to use a RAID 0 system, so I need the full bandwidth of both controllers. Two ports will therefore be left empty, but they'll be useless as the other two ports will be using the entire bandwidth.
Now it would be interesting to know how much bandwidth the display would use. It's still something I could consider after all.
And now while writing this I think I mixed up something. 40 Gb/s is not the full bandwidth of both controllers but of one controller I believe. I would need someone to confirm this. In this case I could in fact use a USB-C adapter.
There's a certain part (around 50%) of the bandwidth that is reserved for data, the rest for video, if I recall correctly. So if I want to get 40 Gb/s data transfer, I need a RAID 0 system which uses two Thunderbolt Controllers (from two different ports). I get 50% of the bandwidth of each, that gives me 40 Gb/s. So there would in fact be 40 Gb/s left for the display.
But someone would need to confirm this and I have no idea how much bandwidth a display like that uses. And what usage consumes how much. Hmmmmm … it's getting interesting.