Ah, this mythical Apple Silicone😉
However, I have mixed feelings. On the one hand, I like my Linux for the fact that it has endless configuration options (by the way - how fun "Show Your Desktop" threads are on the Mac forum😉).
On the other hand, the same is bothering me on my Android phone where chaos reigns in my opinion.
I am looking for the minimum usability in the phone, such as communication, e-mail, car navigation, camera (but for emergencies). I had Nokia E50, Nokia E72, Blackberry Z10.
Now I choose an iPhone from the lower shelf, because it meets these requirements best (although I have many objections to both the phone and Apple).
However, I would be afraid of too far-reaching interference of Apple with my computer or my resources. I also do not need many services for which they optimize their equipment. I don't want Apple Music, I want to freely transfer my music from my CDs that I once bought to my phone.
I'm afraid AS will raise the wall around the garden even higher.
What do you think?
I use iTunes for music as I have a few iPhones and iPod Touch models. I use their Podcast App as well as it makes it easy to automatically fetch my subscriptions. It's nice to have a common interface on macOS and Windows too. I use VLC for videos because they make it very easy to run on a NAS.
I am building a Windows PC, i7-10700, Cougar Max Panzer case, GTX 1050 Ti, and the design is to use minimal power and to keep the system running cool for my applications that require CPU, Network and Storage. My office and casual stuff will be done on macOS. I've used Linux for the past 20 years for work and Unix going back to the 1980s. I worked on Firefox a long time ago and I recall the frustration of Linux proponents about why there was widespread adoption of Firefox but not of Linux on the desktop. Also, why the broad financial success of Firefox? Then you had the broad financial success of Apple and macOS.
Apple and Microsoft make the upgrade and maintenance easier than Linux. My company was large enough to have a Linux support staff and they took care of all of the system maintenance and other tasks so that we could just do our jobs. In smaller companies, you don't have the budget for bigger support staffs so you try to go with something that doesn't cost a lot and there are just a lot of Microsoft IT people out there - they seem to do a good job at providing a training framework and infrastructure.
I'm not sure how macOS IT people get trained and it seems to me that there aren't as many out there but you have fanatics that help out other Mac users. At my former place, when someone came to the IT person for Mac help, he often sent them to me (he did this for many Windows problems as well). I knew all of the Mac people in our building and we helped each other out because the company didn't really provide official support. We eventually adopted macOS as one of our three main desktop platforms and we brought in a few macOS people to help officially. This is the same case with Linux: we had people that used Linux on the desktop but there was no official support. I think that that is still the situation - you can ask and hope for the kindness of strangers.
At the end of the day, you want to get your stuff done with the lowest total cost of ownership and the fewest headaches and the world has gravitated to 1) Windows, 2) macOS and 3) Linux on the desktop. Could AS change that? Sure. If it is really that good. Could that happen? I don't know. Apple seems to have serious CPU design chops these days and they can certainly just buy talent that they need.
Just remember that they did it from scratch with iOS and built an entire category with massive profits.
I will continue to use multiple ecosystems though.
For fitness, I use a Garmin Watch. They are expensive, are not well-known, technically quirky but they are the biggest in the fitness fanatic space. There are others like Polar and Suunto and a number of Chinese offerings that seem to be about cloning Garmin, Suunto and Polar features but they haven't caught my interest yet.