I'm downloading some mp3 at 192kbps and I've been given the choice of vbr or constant bit rate. What should I choose. If one is better than the other why is there a choice? Or does it depend on the type of music.
Are there any situations in which VBR is not better? I think the only time VBR would be worse than constant bit rate is if there was a very consistent level of complexity per unit time interval in the audio, so that the data space spent defining the change in bit rate is essentially a waste. But otherwise, it lets you make the most of a bit rate by doing additional sampling in areas where it can be beneficial.
i've got VBRs that quit playing in itunes. they *are* somewhat old mp3s, made from an earlier version of itunes. it was one friend who kept sending them, and he stopped once i requested it. so maybe it's fixed now, but i figure "why tempt it?"
The only argument for CBR mp3s is for players that cannot play VBR content. Or if you have space/size considerations where you want all of your music to be the same size per minute of music.
The latest Lame encoder (3.97) had lots of improvements and changes specifically for VBR encoding.
These are my favorite Lame settings for 3.97. This analyzes the file and looks at the complexity of the frequency range. Then finds an appropriate VBR, depending on the complexity. Try some dry tests yourself and see if you like VBR or CBR.