I think the main takeaway here is that Consumer Reports just proved they do not test products before recommending them. They are trying to back-peddle in order not to look like fools but it's too late.
so just like Apple huh?
I think the main takeaway here is that Consumer Reports just proved they do not test products before recommending them. They are trying to back-peddle in order not to look like fools but it's too late.
Have you used HTC Windows phones? Trust me - there are worse 'phones' on the market.
yes I have, funnily enough I used an old touch 2 for some of my testing, trust me for actually making a telephone call....anything beats the Apple POS'
Its time for Apple to give us that bumper for free.
I don't want a free bumper. I want a phone that works. My signal loss is almost instantaneous when I cover the left corner.![]()
1) No, most (all) people do NOT have this 'problem'.
I've yet to meet an owner who DOES have it... and this in the most notoriously bad reception area in the country... SF.
Have you used HTC Windows phones? Trust me - there are worse 'phones' on the market.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8A293 Safari/6531.22.7)
There will not be a recall. 3 weeks after launch and
I still can't get one. So I'd say these problems are not hurting sales too much. I'm not defending apple, just saying no company is going to recall a wildly successful product unless it's for some kind of health and safety issue.
Personally, I continue to believe that this is a defect and not a design flaw. Too many people can't replicate the issue, even with low signal, to say this is universal. Also, different ip4s show different behavior in the same spot with the same user (see for example the engadget mobile podcast from the 2nd or 3rd), so there's something wrong with the way some of them were made.
Apple's response:Very interested to see Apple's response.
Merge?: https://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=10509592#post10509592
Auch! BURN!!
Apple denied this way to long already. Don't get me wrong, I love Apple, but their arrogance is getting way over the top. First Apple direct us not to have blu ray. Now they direct us how to hold our phone, and simple deny a serious design flaw. They almost screwed me with my macbook air, where the hinge have a serious design flaw and break. My Iphone 3 is almost unusable after the update, and works as bad as a PC, crashes, sluggish, no battery life anymore. Enough is enough!
In general, It seems ease to become successful, but way harder to keep success. Especially with serious competition on the corner.
As long Apple keep thinking the customers are a stupid sheep who eat this kind of crap, they will be wrong at the end of the story. People won't accept this.
The gap between Apple and the rest (Microsoft) become smaller too.
I forced my Girlfriend a lifetime windows user to go for Mac. But after a few months she still isn't impressed with MAC OS-X and find it hardly an improvement over WIN7. Wake up Apple. You are not longer the most unique in the universe anymore. There are alternatives. And if you keep treating your customers as stupid sheeps, they will go for that "alternative" eventually.
With kind regards,
Bas
Um yeah. The signal isn't making it to anyplace where software can fix it. touching the antenna detunes it and prevents useable signal from making it to the signal processor in the first place.
I don't want a free bumper. I want a phone that works.
Seriously, all bets are that Apple is not going to redesign the iPhone 4 and replace all of the millions of existing ones.This is a design flaw that needs to be corrected ASAP!
problem for Apple is that in some countries..... over here for example (uk) they may have no choice. Which is also why they can never admit a fault.
this is the law over here.. the EU are actually even worse!
Key Facts:
Wherever goods are bought they must "conform to contract". This means they must be as described, fit for purpose and of satisfactory quality (i.e. not inherently faulty at the time of sale).
Goods are of satisfactory quality if they reach the standard that a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory, taking into account the price and any description.
Aspects of quality include fitness for purpose, freedom from minor defects, appearance and finish, durability and safety.
Ms Kroes is already looking at Apple, not a good time for them...
I have been an Apple apologist throughout this whole antenna fiasco but after visiting with a Genius this past Saturday, I hope Apple's stock falls hard and iPhone 4 sales begin to plummet. snip
But didn't you hear? There are three threads full of people who deny that there is no evidence of any problem at all!
I suppose now they'll say that CR's tests don't count because they don't use real cell towers or something.