Do me a favor. Go back and read that article. A couple of things should immediately jump out at you. 1. You're relying on an article that is over 3 years old. Wouldn't it be a bit more prudent to use something more recent? 2. That quote from Beardsley... appears with no context nor any reference to the fact that a. MST is tokenized and contains no personal information and b. is not legacy magstripe tech, but a variation that uses the underlying principles to communicate with legacy tech.That sounds like a good technical argument that I can’t counter! I just know that I’ve read in multiple places that the wireless/radio connection to the card slots is less stable, has less range and is less secure than NFC. Tokenization being separate issue.
I read this in a Mashable article, and I’ve read a handful of other articles that have said similar things. I don’t know the science and engineering well enough to draw my own conclusions, so I rely on what I read and hope that it’s not hype or spin...
“Tod Beardsley, engineering manager at security firm Rapid7, told Mashable that Samsung's use of "extremely legacy technology" is not a good thing. We should be moving away from this technology, not repurposing it.
"Don't get me wrong, I love old tech," Beardsley said. "Most hackers do. But pretty much anything that extends the practical usage life of magstripes is going to be hugely suspect."
Based on the quote, it doesn't even seem as if Beardsley understands what MST is. He's criticizing terminal magstripe tech that is used to read your actual info on your actual credit card. That's not what MST is or does.