Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

msummers

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jul 8, 2012
10
0
Hi
I am thinking about getting an iMac to use as a Main Server and wonder
I am planning on using it for

Vmware fusion probaly going to run windows 10

Basic web search

Boardmaker 7 App which needs 8GB of ram

I am planning on getting the 64gb of ram and keeping the storage at the 512gb I got a NAS for storage

should I stick with the core i7 or upgrade to the i9?
 
Get 3rd party RAM for the 27” Intel. Much cheaper than through Apple. You can get up to 128GB RAM.
 
Yes, that's one place to get it. There are other vendors as well like Crucial, I think. Much cheaper than getting the RAM through Apple. Considering how easy the RAM is to access on the 27" there's no point paying over the top prices for Apple to upgrade it.

Note that with the 2020 performance is poor if you mix and match different types of RAM. So if you buy 3rd party RAM, remove the Apple modules and keep them in a safe place in case you need to put them back in to get service from Apple.
 
Hi
I am thinking about getting an iMac to use as a Main Server and wonder
I am planning on using it for

Vmware fusion probaly going to run windows 10

Basic web search

Boardmaker 7 App which needs 8GB of ram

I am planning on getting the 64gb of ram and keeping the storage at the 512gb I got a NAS for storage

should I stick with the core i7 or upgrade to the i9?
I'd think that a maxed out Intel Mac mini might be more efficient for your use cases (cheaper as well). Then again, I don't know what your intended use case with Fusion is. If you're using Fusion to run Windows 10 for simple processes that don't make use of having a GPU, then I'd say the iMac is probably overkill. Similarly, I don't know how many VMs you intend to run at once, nor what their purposes are.
 
The RAM on the Mini is not user replaceable (it can be done but there is a much greater chance of breaking something). So if you don't want to take a Mac mini apart and need a new screen anyway savings from going with the Mini are not as nearly as great as they first appear. Plus the Mini is using an old CPU. The Intel Mini is badly in need of a replacement with newer Intel processors but considering Apple's move to Apple Silicon that would appear highly unlikely to happen.
 
The Intel Mini is badly in need of a replacement with newer Intel processors but considering Apple's move to Apple Silicon that would appear highly unlikely to happen.

Well Intel is actually releasing an 11th generation B-series desktop CPU on Tiger Lake to replace their "current" 8th generation model (which is what the Mac mini has been stuck with), but I don't expect Apple to adopt it with the move to Apple Silicon.

 
Will something like this work ? 2666DR4S128S ?
Some have had issues with 4 sticks of OWC RAM:


Crucial has the best reputation:


Unfortunately RAM prices have increased about 50% in the last six months:

Screen Shot 2021-07-04 at 7.42.34 PM.png
Most people don't need 128GB RAM. Suggest try 2x32GB and see how it goes - and add another 2x32GB later if really needed
 
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
should I stick with the core i7 or upgrade to the i9?
If you are referring to the 2020 27" iMac, the i9 is only worth considering if you have workloads that can benefit from the two extra cores (e.g. Virtual Machines).

i5, i7 & i9 are just marketing labels Intel uses to confuse people. The i7 vs i9 comparison will be different for different Macs.
 
If you are referring to the 2020 27" iMac, the i9 is only worth considering if you have workloads that can benefit from the two extra cores (e.g. Virtual Machines).

i5, i7 & i9 are just marketing labels Intel uses to confuse people. The i7 vs i9 comparison will be different for different Macs.
I am planning on using the iMac for virtual machine windows 10 and using the imac as a daily computer will the core i7 be good enough or should i upgrade to the core i9?
 
It depends on what you will be doing with those virtual machines. I still use several year old computers. Both the i7 and i9 would be much faster than the CPUs in my computers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ledgem
It depends on what you will be doing with those virtual machines. I still use several year old computers. Both the i7 and i9 would be much faster than the CPUs in my computers.
Agreed, one Windows VM running a single application doesn't need the i9. The money would be better spent increasing storage.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.