I know I should. I'm a greedy mofo. Lol. But my wife said she wants a new camera. Dam there goes my hope.![]()
Well if you wrest control back, get a nice travel case!
I know I should. I'm a greedy mofo. Lol. But my wife said she wants a new camera. Dam there goes my hope.![]()
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)
Oh no question you got one fun machine there man!
Did you get the larger drive
commerceguild said:Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)
Oh no question you got one fun machine there man!
Did you get the larger drive
Thank you that helps. I really hope so!I ordered the 13" MBA with i5 and 256 SSD.
I bought the I7, because I have more $$ than sense. The I5 would have been completely fine for me - if you do HEAVY video editing or photo editing, then the I7 MIGHT make sense. Otherwise, the I5 is a great machine.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)
That's the one I'm eyeing myself
What about the people saying that the fans on their i7 Airs are running way too much etc.?
Since you'll be doing Photoshop, there is a difference. The 1.7GHz i5 will turbo boost to 2.3; and the 1.8 i7 will boost to 2.9. So that's 2.3 vs 2.9. That's a straight up fact, none of the opinions. Some people here think they're still discussing C2D processors with a .1 GHz difference. Like one poster here mentioned, if you don't care for a few seconds, the 2010 models will also do just fine. Choice is yours, OP.
And if the next processor-gen./MBA update is much better than the actual i5's or i7's, I'll sell my MBA and buy the next one.
I ordered the i7 and would have said that the threads on this forum are more pro i5 than i7, you favor the i5 and feel the i5 is getting a bad rap.Nice to hear that someone wants the i5 too.
1. Because if you read in this forum you get the feeling that the i5 is a lame duck.
I haven't got a clue what this means. Could you please translate it into English for those of us over 40?2. And up on the i7 everything seems to be junk.
It's a little confusing here, after you've made the i5 so bad.
I think the i5 is good and solid processor and should do my usual tasks in: mail, office, social networks, aperture, iTunes ( watching movies, listening to music) and playing some fun games. However, it should be better as with the most 2010 13" MacBook Pros.
So, I just ordered the 13" model with the i5 1.7GHz processor a few seconds ago. As I said, 150 (215 US$) seems a little bit much for the upgrade (Europe).
I hope, I'll will have fun with it, even if it's not a i7 MacBook Air.
Guys, you can say there is no difference all you want, but if that were the case Intel would only release one version, not two. That many people can't TELL the difference is a whole other matter.
I see some i5 buyers showing mild regret and letting the i7 buyers get inside their heads.
Sigh. "Too much" is so subjective. I can barely hear them even when they are running full blast. If I were in a completely sealed room with no other noises, the ringing in my ears would be worse than the MBA fans on an i7 model..
spending $1600 on a laptop is a lot of money, and I'd rather get the fastest possible processor I can in the hope of extending its usefulness in the future.
I can see some people feel superior because they bought the i7, and put down those who bought the i5
For my company we'll be ordering i5 11's and i7 13's.
Agreed, i7 in 11" for our uses may have more disadvantages then advantages.
Apple Expert, while we're talking performance, how many CPUs does the Activity monitor show for the i7 and i5? There seems to be a good bit of confusion whether or not the new Airs support hyper threading/turboboost. I know on my 2010 dual core i5 MBP it shows four virtual CPUs on the activity monitor.
I think so, doesn't that indicate 4 virtual cores?