Does such a thing exist? I would like to take advantage of the data integrity, backup options etc of PostgreSQL but keep the simplicity of CoreData.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
macOS CoreData PostgreSQL plugin/bridge
- Thread starter MorphingDragon
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
The new NSIncrementalStore and NSIncrementalSotreNode classes added to Core data in Mac OS X Lion are meant to allow this to happen.
http://developer.apple.com/library/...ef/doc/uid/TP40010637-CH1-DontLinkElementID_4
A Google search just revealed tweets about people who hope someone (who?) would implement them for PostgreSQL. So, no, I don't think anyone's done it yet.
Also I don't think Core Data copes with multi-user, concurrent-access databases. I don't know how it would cope with having the backing store change from under it.
http://developer.apple.com/library/...ef/doc/uid/TP40010637-CH1-DontLinkElementID_4
A Google search just revealed tweets about people who hope someone (who?) would implement them for PostgreSQL. So, no, I don't think anyone's done it yet.
Also I don't think Core Data copes with multi-user, concurrent-access databases. I don't know how it would cope with having the backing store change from under it.
You might want to check out the BaseTen framework which is a core-data-like implementation of PostgreSQL--although not actually core data. The project used to be open sourced with a commercial license available for purchase, but it's now under the Apache license, so there's no reason not to check it out.