Corellium Accuses Apple of Using Lawsuit to 'Crack Down on Jailbreaking'

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
47,087
9,060



Apple is currently involved in a lawsuit against Corellium, a mobile device virtualization company that supports iOS. Apple has accused Corellium of copyright infringement because Corellium creates software designed for security researchers that replicates iOS.

The lawsuit has been ongoing since August, but it is heating up after Apple amended its lawsuit in late December with a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) filing, suggesting the Cupertino company believes jailbreaking is a violation of the DMCA. Corellium, says Apple, facilitates jailbreaking through its software.

A virtual ?iPhone? on Corellium's website used as evidence in Apple's lawsuit against the company​

Corellium's CEO Amanda Gorton has taken issue with Apple's new filing, and yesterday penned a missive lambasting Apple for its jailbreaking position. "Apple's latest filing against Corellium should give all security researchers, app developers, and jailbreakers reason to be concerned," reads the letter's opening statement.
The filing asserts that because Corellium "allows users to jailbreak" and "gave one or more Persons access... to develop software that can be used to jailbreak," Corellium is "engaging in trafficking" in violation of the DMCA. In other words, Apple is asserting that anyone who provides a tool that allows other people to jailbreak, and anyone who assists in creating such a tool, is violating the DMCA. Apple underscores this position by calling the unc0ver jailbreak tool "unlawful" and stating that it is "designed to circumvent [the] same technological measures" as Corellium.
Gorton accuses Apple of using its Corellium lawsuit to "crack down on jailbreaking" and claims Apple is seeking a precedent to eliminate public jailbreaks. She says that Corellium is "deeply disappointed" by Apple's "demonization of jailbreaking" as developers and researchers "rely on jailbreaks" to test the security of their own apps and third-party apps. She further claims that Apple has benefited from jailbreaking by turning jailbreak tweaks into iPhone features.
Not only do researchers and developers rely on jailbreaking to protect end users, but Apple itself has directly benefited from the jailbreak community in a number of ways. Many of the features of iOS originally appeared as jailbreak tweaks and were copied by Apple, including dark mode, control center, and context menus.

In addition, jailbreak creators regularly contribute to the security of iOS. The developer behind the unc0ver jailbreak was acknowledged and credited by Apple for assisting with a security vulnerability in the iOS kernel - a vulnerability he discovered while using Corellium.
Gorton says that Corellium is prepared to "strongly defend" against Apple's attack, and looks forward to sharing a formal response to Apple's claims in court.

Apple is continuing to seek a permanent injunction to prevent Corellium from offering a product that replicates the iOS operating system. Apple wants Corellium to destroy all infringing materials that it has collected, and pay Apple damages, lost profits, and attorney fees.

Article Link: Corellium Accuses Apple of Using Lawsuit to 'Crack Down on Jailbreaking'
 
  • Like
Reactions: bb9

I7guy

macrumors Core
Nov 30, 2013
21,260
9,057
Gotta be in it to win it
So, in essence Corellium said that Apple benefitted from jailbreaking by stealing others ideas. However if Apple had “stolen” ideas from paid apps, they would be labeled as anti-competitive.
 

MikeMo

macrumors newbie
Mar 11, 2003
17
36
So here's the deal: do we want our phones to be secure or not? If we want them to be uncrackable, then we should support Apple on this lawsuit. If we really want to jailbreak them (for what?), then we are giving up security. Cant have both.
 

DJLAXL

macrumors 6502a
Jun 3, 2014
518
377
UT
Jailbreaking stopped being cool after the 4. Having Siri on my 4 was fun. Having unlimited lollipops in Candy Crush was fun. After that? No thanks. Now its all kids crying about snapchat tweaks who offer nothing to the jailbreaking community. Drove out all the pioneers who made the scene what it was.
 

kstotlani

macrumors 6502a
Oct 27, 2006
568
735
So here's the deal: do we want our phones to be secure or not? If we want them to be uncrackable, then we should support Apple on this lawsuit. If we really want to jailbreak them (for what?), then we are giving up security. Cant have both.
There are pros and cons for both. I only tried jail breaking once and found that there was more innovation in a less restrictive space. E.g. Control center was implemented long back which took Apple more time to implement. Obviously I would err on the side of caution because unlike before (IPhone 3GS) I now have my banking apps on my phone and wouldn’t want to risk losing my data.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bb9

whyamihere

macrumors 6502
Jun 30, 2008
433
610
'nati
If nothing else, there is a difference between someone owning a physical phone and trying to jailbreak it vs this company providing a virtual ripoff of iOS online.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mejsric

69Mustang

macrumors 604
Jan 7, 2014
7,129
12,971
In between a rock and a hard place
So here's the deal: do we want our phones to be secure or not? If we want them to be uncrackable, then we should support Apple on this lawsuit. If we really want to jailbreak them (for what?), then we are giving up security. Cant have both.
Ha! That premise is both false and silly... mostly silly. There never has been, nor will there ever be "uncrackable". Supporting Apple won't change that at all. Most understand that. So by all means, support Apple if that is your want. Just please don't use that "uncrackable" nonsense as a reason. Security is a game of one-upsmanship. Security get's better by being challenged out in the open.

Not really sure how, when, or where you formed your opinion about jailbreaking and having security. It's just plain wrong. You can have both. Evidence is the fact that we do have both and have had both for years. Probably gonna continue to have both for the foreseeable future.
 

techguy9

macrumors 6502
Aug 16, 2014
337
261
Atlanta, GA
So it went from ripping off IP (which isn’t true in this case) to supporting jailbreaking (which this emulator doesn’t specifically encourage). Seems legit.
 

confessJason

Cancelled
Oct 14, 2011
86
258
Always knew Apple stole UI designs from so-called nobodies. Apple can’t design itself out of a paper bag yet they apparently know better than us mere mortals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marcode

realtuner

macrumors 68000
Mar 8, 2019
1,689
4,891
Canada
Curious. What exactly do you think is indefensible about their business practices?
They created an emulator to duplicate iOS. Then they lied by trying to say this is about jailbreaking and accusing Apple of being against jailbreaking. That’s NOT what Apple is saying.

What Apple says is Corellium can’t make an iOS emulator. It’s irrelevant if someone uses that emulator to aid in making a jailbreak, to do security research or just to test new features.
 

Rogifan

macrumors Core
Nov 14, 2011
20,980
24,056
Why would anyone who would has any clue what jailbreaking even is want to use an iOS device in the first place? Just use Android where you can customize and side load all you want. iOS is the property of Apple. No one has the right to modify it as they wish.
 

69Mustang

macrumors 604
Jan 7, 2014
7,129
12,971
In between a rock and a hard place
They created an emulator to duplicate iOS. Then they lied by trying to say this is about jailbreaking and accusing Apple of being against jailbreaking. That’s NOT what Apple is saying.

What Apple says is Corellium can’t make an iOS emulator. It’s irrelevant if someone uses that emulator to aid in making a jailbreak, to do security research or just to test new features.
Thanks. I understand exactly what they did. I even read it in the article too. :D My question to Carl was what does he think was indefensible.
- - Post merged: - -

Why would anyone who would has any clue what jailbreaking even is want to use an iOS device in the first place? Just use Android where you can customize and side load all you want. iOS is the property of Apple. No one has the right to modify it as they wish.
That's akin to saying if you want your Mustang faster, go buy a Hellcat. :rolleyes::D Telling someone to move to Android doesn't actually sate their desire to modify iOS.
 
Last edited:

ActionableMango

macrumors G3
Sep 21, 2010
9,511
6,700
So it went from ripping off IP (which isn’t true in this case)
It's not true? In the lawsuit, Apple is accusing Corellium of literally copying the code. If Corellium didn't copy it, then they should be screaming that from the rooftops.

However, I haven't seen Corellium refute that anywhere. In fact at Black Hat they bragged that it is an exact copy of iOS.