Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
hi scott9s, you got the gskill cl4 rams up and running? How are they?

The gskill memory runs just fine for me on the latest mbp pro early 2008 penryn. I'm in bootcamp now with windows. Win XP 32bit says I have 3 GB of RAM.

I ran the rightmark Memory Analyzer tool. Attached are some screenshots and html file with results.

Overall, I love the 17" hi-res matte screen, and the system is fast. Still trying to figure out all the tweaks and all. Sure is fun. I think I have not felt this jazzed about a computer since the win95 upgrade from dos. Upgrading to win98, NT4, 2000, XP, 2003 Server, Vista. They all felt the same. Sure there was a cool bone here and there, but nothing out of the ordinary new. os X feels fun.
 

Attachments

  • RMMA-System-Info.zip
    1.7 KB · Views: 64
  • ScreenShot001.jpg
    ScreenShot001.jpg
    67.9 KB · Views: 75
  • ScreenShot002.jpg
    ScreenShot002.jpg
    53.4 KB · Views: 51
  • ScreenShot003.jpg
    ScreenShot003.jpg
    120.5 KB · Views: 81
Ahh FINALLY, someone actually posted screens with this.

Thank you for FINALLY showing that it does work!! :D
 
Thanks for the data scott; what it is reporting is the SPD information from the chips - the identity that is burned into them -- that is good as far as it goes -- I don't see any results showing tested latency figures - it's all N/A,

We would expect a CL4 chip to report CL4 from its SPD. However, we still need to know is the Mac taking advantage of it, and what is the effect on performance?

A sidebyside test against 4 Gb of CL5 RAM on the same machine with the same test program would help show the results.

(Yes, I know that's part of what Corsair's white paper has -- I'm looking for independent results from a current model Mac)

The Corsairs won't start arriving in Canada for another week or 2
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.