Since 16e is not SE in name and pegged to iPhone 16 gen maybe it will be $499 in the fall when iPhone 17 is the latest and regular iPhones 16 non pro drop $100 as well
They’re just going to capture sales for 6 months at 599 and milk it until then
Since 16e is not SE in name and pegged to iPhone 16 gen maybe it will be $499 in the fall when iPhone 17 is the latest and regular iPhones 16 non pro drop $100 as well
They’re just going to capture sales for 6 months at 599 and milk it until then
Since 16e is not SE in name and pegged to iPhone 16 gen maybe it will be $499 in the fall when iPhone 17 is the latest and regular iPhones 16 non pro drop $100 as well
They’re just going to capture sales for 6 months at 599 and milk it until then
Since 16e is not SE in name and pegged to iPhone 16 gen maybe it will be $499 in the fall when iPhone 17 is the latest and regular iPhones 16 non pro drop $100 as well
They’re just going to capture sales for 6 months at 599 and milk it until then
And yet they wanted all the upgrades for $20 more than the 128GB SE3 🤦♂️ 🤦 🤦♀️
Plus the 16e is priced the same as the 128GB 14 brand new before it got replaced hence the 16e is a fusion of two iPhones into one ( and this is obviously not the first time it has happened and not the last)
Yes, Apple could have priced it at $500. Apple has a net profit margin somewhere in the 25 - 30% range. Assuming Apple has similar margins on this as all products and services (likely lower with this phone because of the costs of the C1 development and the switch to a new design -- plus that net margin includes high margin services), that means it costs Apple about $435 to make this phone. A $500 price would give Apple about a 13% profit margin.