Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No

- e-ink devices feel way better in hand & are lighter
- e-ink devices last way longer, which is more to the purpose of reading books. I don't want to pick up my "book" and every 3 days the device is dead
- the iPad is way too delicate
- e-ink screen for reading looks way better, and its nice it doesnt need backlight
 
Ideally, a folding iPhone as an eReader will mean you never have to charge it... since you're already charging your iPhone daily.
 
Just bought an iPad Pro M5 11" OLED to replace my older iPP 11" 2020. If I have to do any kind of heavy reading of books, I'm still on an actual book or Kindle-- you just can't beat E-ink for reading. OLED is better than LED but still produces a lot of eye strain, especially at night.
 
1) As long as there's no way to install Calibre in an iOS device?
(and there currently isn't?)

No, no iPad will ever replace e-readers for a good number of people.
Will it, could it, in the future?
No. Calibre's dev has stated many times he doesn't intend to port it there. Very definitively too.

2) As long as it's locked and impossible to Jailbreak?

No, no new iPad will ever replace e-readers for a good number of people.
See how people that read, from anywhere in terms of 'sources', that have no brand "loyalties", use e-readers.. why, and how.. all i can say without potetially violating some rule here.

The end.

Now. Could your typical multi-device owning, statistically US (cultural differences) residing Apple fan buy one for reading? Very different thing 🙂
But, the end of e-readers? "Kindle killer" ??? Ouch with the shilling.

Apple's a great company, i don't think they need shilling. Or catchy titles. Or subjects that promote such concepts.
 
Last edited:
I have a 6th-gen iPad that's been rendered pretty much useless since iPadOS 17. That OS never should have been allowed on that hardware. There just isn't enough RAM for it.

That said, I've been waiting for at least a year for a substantive update to the iPad mini to come out. I was hoping for a better processor and OLED screen in 2024, and the October refresh that year was underwhelming.

If this rumoured iPad mini update does in fact come with a more future-proof processor and a better screen, I'm in.
 
Not until there's a true "killer app" for reading on the mini—and no, Apple Books isn't it unless you're fully committed to buying all your books from Apple and living with it as a clunky manager for your existing books.

It's a beautiful app for actually reading, though. I wish I could use it as my primary book app. But in my experience, it's frustrating when organizing, searching, or managing metadata beyond "Title" and "Author". Worse, when the iPad is running low on storage, it can remove downloaded books—even the ones you've manually downloaded recently. That was an unpleasant surprise on my last cruise.

Unfortunately, the third-party landscape isn't much better. Yomu is decent, but I often run into formatting glitches, even with simple novels. KyBook is pretty much abandonware at this point. RIP Marvin. BookFusion is okay, but feels like it's trying to do too much (and is yet another SaaS subscription). And the big-name competitors are too deep in their own ecosystems of bookstores (Amazon, Barnes & Noble, etc.) with weak support for existing e-book libraries, just like Apple.

There's some promising stuff on the horizon like BookNexus (still in beta) but it seems like this category of apps is stagnant. That's a shame, because an OLED iPad mini could definitely be a great reading device for a lot of people. OLED isn't perfect, but for technical manuals, diagrams, magazines, maybe you're into graphic novels/comics—there are reasons to look beyond e-ink.

I just wish Apple would invest in the Books app to really make the iPad shine as a reading device. That's why the Kindle still owns this space. It isn't just the e-ink display; it's the whole system. Amazon took the iPod + iTunes model and built it for books. Apple could absolutely do the same, but the Books app is only halfway there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: servenvolley
How many times has this come up? No. The kindle is the kindle because e-ink.

I have tried for years to read on a iPad, but e-ink wins every time.

Edit: Oh yea, I paid $99 for it on sale, and it'll probably last a decade. My previous one did.
Agree 100%. The e-ink is currently unrivaled, even by OLED, when it comes to reduced reading fatigue and eye-strain.
 
If you want an e-ink device no tablet is going to replace that regardless of OLED vs LCD. A kindle/kobo/etc is just a different class of device. Like a pen and a pencil. They can both be used for writing but if you want a pencil, it doesn’t matter how good or fancy a pen is. It will not work for you.

But there are plenty of us who read just fine on an iPad mini and appreciate having a single device that can do a lot, including reading. I read ebooks, manga, web novels and my own creative writing (in Obsidian) on my iPad mini. A e-ink reader can only do one of those things well. OLED will only improve all of these things and especially if there is any improvement in brightness I am here for it!

Written on my iPad mini 7.
 
Surely they could create a “reader” screen profile programmed in on all OLED iPads that would more simulate paper.

The failing of e-ink is any pictures especially color.

Yes they need to address the liquid rating of iPads.
Looking at what Samsung was just able to do with the software controlled privacy filter it would be pretty cool if Apple (or anyone) could come up with a display that can do both traditional touch screen backlighting and ALSO have a special ereader mode. That would be amazing. (I have no idea if it is possible but I also would have said a software controlled privacy filter is not possible so what do I know).
 
Yep! Also e-ink has massive battery life and remains perfectly legible without backlight in any decent ambient light -- and really excels outdoors. E-readers also only do basically one thing, which makes them pretty much distraction-proof. Much better for a dedicated reader device IMO.

(slightly off-topic, but Kobos are an awesome alternative to Kindle and super easy to customize if you’re so inclined)
I lov my mimi, and used to read on my iPads. E-ink is so much easier on the eyes. - I agree with you.

(Kobos are fantastic, love my Clara. Boox and XTEInk have some interesting devices as well.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
Lots of people extolling the virtues of eink. I went the other direction. I find eink screens, especially on Kindle, to be fuzzy and too low contrast. My iPad mini’s screen is bright and sharp. Way easier for me to read.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dreamholde
However, dedicated e-readers would still retain some major advantages over the iPad mini. Kindle and Kobo devices use e-ink screens that reflect ambient light rather than emitting light directly toward the eyes, behaving much more like paper. Many readers find that e-ink screens cause less fatigue during long reading sessions. Outdoor readability is another area where e-ink remains superior, since they become easier to read as ambient light increases.

Battery life is also dramatically different. Most e-readers last weeks on a single charge because the screen only uses power when the page changes. The iPad mini typically lasts for around a day or two of mixed use at most. E-readers are also intentionally limited devices that focus on reading, while tablets encourage multitasking, which can make focused reading more difficult for some users.

So that's a no then, it won't be a Kindle killer. Much shorter battery life, no e-ink, and it's quadruple the cost of a Kindle.
 
Lots of people extolling the virtues of eink. I went the other direction. I find eink screens, especially on Kindle, to be fuzzy and too low contrast. My iPad mini’s screen is bright and sharp. Way easier for me to read.

A lot depends on reading conditions. I prefer the iPad indoors but outdoors the Kindle wins hands down.
 
Lots of people extolling the virtues of eink. I went the other direction. I find eink screens, especially on Kindle, to be fuzzy and too low contrast. My iPad mini’s screen is bright and sharp. Way easier for me to read.
Yeah and I find it's really only good for novels primarily. If you are reading technical books or some non-fiction stuff with diagrams, pictures, code samples, etc., I much prefer an LCD or OLED screen.

eInk is definitely nice in bright sunlight, but then again with an iPad you can adjust background/foreground colors in myriad ways that I find avoid most eye strain. I mean, I stare at the desktop screen all day long, it doesn't cause eyestrain.

Also I find it nice to be able to lookup stuff when reading -- not just word definitions, but to explore other things like maps, videos, etc. related to what I'm reading. And to be able to check your email or the web without switching devices...

Not to mention stuff like the New York Times which often includes animated data -- I just find the iPad to be a far superior device for reading.
 
Eh? NO! Kindle is built for one specific purpose and it is fantastic at it, to read without distraction on a screen that is incredibly easy on the eyes. You can easily have a Kindle AND an iPad at the same time as they are for different purposes. Some still get effected by PWM from OLED so they can’t use it for reading.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.