Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

dj1891

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
I was thinking about this today. Its a really tough sell. The S3 in the UK is £199, for £199 you could get the Versa 3 for example, much more up to date, good battery, SPO2 to name a few features. You could get various Garmin watches. I'm not sure what Apple is thinking tbh, Sure keep the S3 but in no way is it worth £199, £149 yeah maybe.
 
No. S3 has lost all of its value by this point. Even a used S4 has better value than S3 brand new. The only point for recommending is brand new $99 and no higher, and then S3 might be a super budget Apple Watch for people who cant afford iphone 13 pro max.
 
I wouldn't recommend the S3 to anyone and am very surprised Apple keeps selling it. I would suggest a used or refurbished 4/5 instead, much better experience.
 
I probably wouldn't recommend S3 unless the person really wanted to have an Apple Watch and really couldn't afford the SE or S6/S7.

A person looking for any brand smart watch... not the kind of people I encounter. They're specifically interested in Apple Watch. People looking for a fitness tracker alone... sure, there may be reasons to go with something else. I don't run into them very often (yes, pun intended). But if they're looking for the kind of multi-function integration with iPhone that Watch delivers, imo nothing else will do.
 
No it’s not. Some people don’t need the latest and the greatest and thus won’t spend that much. Where can you get a 4 for $200?
Not needing the latest and greatest? The 4 isn't exactly the latest and greatest. I'm still using the 4 and don't plan on upgrading to the series 7 this year. It's a great watch. The 3 lacks a bunch of things that will hinder it from being usable long-term (storage and processor speed primarily). I couldn't recommend the series 3 at all.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.