I was wondering if photography work depends mostly on cpu or gpu? That way i can decide between the 2014 or quad 2012 mac.
With photoshop, RAM matters more than either. CPU next. GPU hardly at all. Video editing is different, especially with Premiere, where the GPU really matters for rendering.
With Aperture and the upcoming Photos app the gpu is used extensively. Also, Pixelmator is almost exclusively gpu-driven It is a speed demon, even on the new 1.4 gHz Mini. Most of the Nik suite is also gpu-intensive.
Actually the ssd makes the biggest difference.With photoshop, RAM matters more than either. CPU next. GPU hardly at all. Video editing is different, especially with Premiere, where the GPU really matters for rendering.
Actually the ssd makes the biggest difference.
It's the other way around. An ssd makes everything faster if you have enough memory.That's only true if you don't have enough RAM. Otherwise, it's not relevant.
It's the other way around. An ssd makes everything faster if you have enough memory.
It's the other way around. An ssd makes everything faster if you have enough memory.
That's not what you said earlier. You said an SSD was most important, which isn't true. RAM is most important to Photoshop.
Photoshop runs fine on a mba with 4gb and a pcie ssd. It does not run as fine on a mac mini with 8gb and an hdd. Also an ssd makes startup faster and everything more responsive.That's not what you said earlier. You said an SSD was most important, which isn't true. RAM is most important to Photoshop.
Photoshop runs fine on a mba with 4gb and a pcie ssd. It does not run as fine on a mac mini with 8gb and an hdd. Also an ssd makes startup faster and everything more responsive.
My point was that an ssd brings greater and more universal benefits than a ram upgrade.It wouldn't run fine for me. For some projects, 16 GB of RAM is barely enough. I wouldn't even consider a mba for photoshop.
My point was that an ssd brings greater and more universal benefits than a ram upgrade.
My point was that an ssd brings greater and more universal benefits than a ram upgrade.
Have you actually tried photoshop on a current mba? I get the feeling you haven't and your opinion is based on assumptions.![]()
I have same question recently. About video, rendering 3D CG motion and video from camera, I mean rendering not encoding or decoding, comparing 3d with camera video, are they different on usage of cpu and gpu? thanksWith photoshop, RAM matters more than either. CPU next. GPU hardly at all. Video editing is different, especially with Premiere, where the GPU really matters for rendering.
Wrong, Disk access is most important in PS, especially if you have more than 1 history level. PS writes every brush stroke to disk... So the 2.5 inch 5400rpm drive always destroys any potential Photoshop performance.With photoshop, RAM matters more than either. CPU next. GPU hardly at all. Video editing is different, especially with Premiere, where the GPU really matters for rendering.
Wrong, Disk access is most important in PS, especially if you have more than 1 history level. So the 2.5 inch 5400rpm drive always destroys any potential Photoshop performance.
I'd rather do large files in PS on my old emulated PPC CS1 on a Core2duo with 4GB and 7200rpm Barracuda than on my i5 16GB mini with CS5 and stock drive.
No, you're wrong. Those history levels will be in RAM, unless you don't have the amount of RAM you should have.
Correct.
It's the other way around. An ssd makes everything faster if you have enough memory.
No, you're wrong. Those history levels will be in RAM, unless you don't have the amount of RAM you should have.