Well, I did write them, using their Web form, so they're now reading everything we write. Hi, Crucial! Or shall I say, Bye, Crucial!
If you want to stick with Crucial, newegg.com seems a good choice, they are selling the same Crucial memory for $139.99.solvs said:Why not just buy Crucial RAM from Newegg? Seems to be cheaper anyway, and no BS. I'm also happy with OWC, but I hear good things about Datamem. CanadaRAM raves about them and he's a Ram, so he should know.![]()
PaulinMaryland said:Well, I did write them, using their Web form, so they're now reading everything we write. Hi, Crucial! Or shall I say, Bye, Crucial!
So far more than 1260 people accessed this thread, looks like they halted the policy after being warned about it. Can other members confirm this? Well, I don't trust them anymore, and I think it should be wise checking for that policy practice before buying from them, now or in the future.Abstract said:I never bothered because even if they stop doing this, I'm not going to buy from them anymore.
No, they're still doing it. I'm seeing an up-to-$7 or so swing for the same memory, depending on which tab I'm looking at in Safari... Core Duo Mac mini ($246.16 for 2 GB RAM kit) or Core Solo Mac mini ($253.33 for 2 GB RAM kit).Locatel said:So far more than 1260 people accessed this thread, looks like they halted the policy after being warned about it. Can other members confirm this? Well, I don't trust them anymore, and I think it should be wise checking for that policy practice before buying from them, now or in the future.
Probably nothing. I wonder how much of their market is made up of the sort of buyer (geeky folks like us) who reads that sort of thing. If somebody little or performance-oriented (OCZ or whatever) did, that'd be different, but Micron is huge.ohalexis said:I wonder what happens if this goes publicly on magzines, nespapers...can't wait![]()
ohalexis said:Bring it to the top so that everyone knows.
I wonder what happens if this goes publicly on magzines, nespapers...can't wait![]()
plunar said:please, enough of the crying. there is nothing wrong with bargaining. not trying to start something here, but why is it always such an alien concept to americans?
How the hell do you bargain in such a system? Accessing from different computers and different browsers combinations untill you get a lower price? Are you out of your mind? Remember, this is done behind our backs, the only way to find out about these practices is through threads like this one. It's hard to believe this is legal!!! Your misconcept of the word "bargaining" is clear. Capitalism gives you the possibility to shop somewhere else for a better price, through companies that respect its customers, giving them an equal chance of price and quality comparison, so they can decide what's best. Don't tell me Crucial is the umbeatable source for RAM in the competitive, continental USA!!! I will not, ever, support such business practice. To me, it makes difference. Playing this kind of game is like fighting an opponent using a horseshoe inside your glove, without him knowing it.plunar said:please, enough of the crying. there is nothing wrong with bargaining. not trying to start something here, but why is it always such an alien concept to americans? like they are so accustomed to nation-wide, wal-mart style retail price setting, that the mere suggestion of a seller trying to bargain for a better deal with some customers is considered insidious? i can't believe how many americans i've met don't even try!
i'm not one to say if crucial's automated, cookie-based system is the best way about it, but the fact of it is capitalism. got a problem with it, move to north korea.
plunar said:This is not some conspiracy theory. People shop, and take the best deal they can find (usually). If crucial is decidedly not the best deal, then don't buy from them.
Stop the whining about how it's not "legal." They can charge whoever they want, whatever they want. it doesn't mean you have to buy it. No business is assigned set price lists (again, see NK if that's your thing). As others have pointed out, it sounds like they are far from the best deal anyhow. So what do you care if you don't buy from them anyway?
Here's a clue: you're in Shanghai and a tout selling fake jade tries to make a sale. Two people walk down the street: one clearly local working male, wearing beaten jeans, and the other a non-chinese speaking white couple carrying a Nikon camera, aloha shirts and sunglasses. Who do you think he's going to offer the better deal? This is no different than what crucial is attempting to do (albeit, I personally think they fail miserably).
Raising a hissy-fit over this kind of bull crap is just pathetic and rather naive.
Crucial is trying to get better deals by analysing the consumer behavior, just like the guy in Shanghai. The difference is that the aloha couple still have a chance to BARGAIN (I'm shure they are at least aware the guy doesn't have a fixed price on the jade). Very different from Crucial's price policy, where you are inclined to think they have a fixed price for everyone, untill you bump into informations like the ones discussed in this thread.plunar said:This is not some conspiracy theory. People shop, and take the best deal they can find (usually). If crucial is decidedly not the best deal, then don't buy from them.
Stop the whining about how it's not "legal." They can charge whoever they want, whatever they want. it doesn't mean you have to buy it. No business is assigned set price lists (again, see NK if that's your thing). As others have pointed out, it sounds like they are far from the best deal anyhow. So what do you care if you don't buy from them anyway?
Here's a clue: you're in Shanghai and a tout selling fake jade tries to make a sale. Two people walk down the street: one clearly local working male, wearing beaten jeans, and the other a non-chinese speaking white couple carrying a Nikon camera, aloha shirts and sunglasses. Who do you think he's going to offer the better deal? This is no different than what crucial is attempting to do (albeit, I personally think they fail miserably).
Raising a hissy-fit over this kind of bull crap is just pathetic and rather naive.
The concept is far from alien, as any American who has shopped for a new or used car can attest. The difference is: When buying a car, we know the rules of the game: The pretty lady one cash register over may have been offered a lower price, the wingtipped-executive a higher one. We know that when the salesman tells us, "This is best price I can offer," we should be suspicious.plunar said:please, enough of the crying. there is nothing wrong with bargaining. not trying to start something here, but why is it always such an alien concept to americans?