Crowdsourcing Update
The iPad was touted to have a better UI optimized for tablet over the Android counterparts.
Is there a point in getting the 10.5" or 12.9" iPad Pro if most apps you use frequently are not updated to support its resolution? (e.g. wasted space all over and apps not looking right = user experience suffers)
Since there isn't an easy way to know which apps are supported on the Pro formats, I have an idea to consolidate this information in a table. But this would require the help of fellow MacRumors friends here, through crowdsourcing.
If any of you could chip in and let me know which apps are supported for which format/features, I'm sure some people will find it helpful (I know I'll be thankful!). It would also be great if you all could post screenshots of the app on the format (e.g. 10.5" or 12.9") so all of us can have a concrete visual example of the app in question.
P.S. I have an issue inserting an image through URL, so had to upload an attachment
Original Post
How does non-optimized content look on the new iPad Pro?
Both 10.5" and 12.9".
So I had a look at the demo units at the Apple Store. Obviously, we were not allowed to install apps onto the demo units, so I had to work with what was available.
The YouTube app was not present, so I fired up both mobile & desktop YouTube using Safari, and with the highest quality setting (720p), it looks horrendous on both the 10.5" and 12.9" iPad Pro.
Some apps installed on the demo units were also not optimized for the larger display, and it is apparent from both the user interface and images in the app (pixelated).
We have been using the 9.7" display since the iPad's inception, and all iPad apps are designed to work with the 9.7" display first. Now that there is no longer a 9.7" display for the Pro models, I wonder what will be the de facto screen size developers will work with from now.
1. How does non-optimized content look on the 10.5"? Are they stretched from 9.7"? Does the content or video look blurry?
2. How much of the apps are already optimized for 10.5" and 12.9" display? My worry is, upgrading from a 9.7" screen, that if apps take a long time to be optimized, the experience will not be as great as on the 9.7" iPad Pro.
3. What is the minimum resolution for video content to look crisp and sharp?
- e.g. 720p looks quite decent on my 9.7" iPad Pro, 1080p is better, but I can't discern 1440p on a 9.7".
- What's the ideal minimum quality for 10.5" and 12.9"?
4. Lastly, anyone has any idea if the following apps are optimized for the new iPad Pros (10.5" + 12.9") already?
- AVPlayerHD (my de facto video app of choice with customized swipe gestures)
- YouTube
- Air Video HD
- Spotify
- Pocket
- Flipboard
- Toggle
Thank you all in advance for your inputs and discussion.
Food for Thought
The iPad was touted to have a better UI optimized for tablet over the Android counterparts.
Is there a point in getting the 10.5" or 12.9" iPad Pro if most apps you use frequently are not updated to support its resolution? (e.g. wasted space all over and apps not looking right = user experience suffers)
The iPad was touted to have a better UI optimized for tablet over the Android counterparts.
Is there a point in getting the 10.5" or 12.9" iPad Pro if most apps you use frequently are not updated to support its resolution? (e.g. wasted space all over and apps not looking right = user experience suffers)
Since there isn't an easy way to know which apps are supported on the Pro formats, I have an idea to consolidate this information in a table. But this would require the help of fellow MacRumors friends here, through crowdsourcing.
If any of you could chip in and let me know which apps are supported for which format/features, I'm sure some people will find it helpful (I know I'll be thankful!). It would also be great if you all could post screenshots of the app on the format (e.g. 10.5" or 12.9") so all of us can have a concrete visual example of the app in question.
P.S. I have an issue inserting an image through URL, so had to upload an attachment
Original Post
How does non-optimized content look on the new iPad Pro?
Both 10.5" and 12.9".
So I had a look at the demo units at the Apple Store. Obviously, we were not allowed to install apps onto the demo units, so I had to work with what was available.
The YouTube app was not present, so I fired up both mobile & desktop YouTube using Safari, and with the highest quality setting (720p), it looks horrendous on both the 10.5" and 12.9" iPad Pro.
Some apps installed on the demo units were also not optimized for the larger display, and it is apparent from both the user interface and images in the app (pixelated).
We have been using the 9.7" display since the iPad's inception, and all iPad apps are designed to work with the 9.7" display first. Now that there is no longer a 9.7" display for the Pro models, I wonder what will be the de facto screen size developers will work with from now.
1. How does non-optimized content look on the 10.5"? Are they stretched from 9.7"? Does the content or video look blurry?
2. How much of the apps are already optimized for 10.5" and 12.9" display? My worry is, upgrading from a 9.7" screen, that if apps take a long time to be optimized, the experience will not be as great as on the 9.7" iPad Pro.
3. What is the minimum resolution for video content to look crisp and sharp?
- e.g. 720p looks quite decent on my 9.7" iPad Pro, 1080p is better, but I can't discern 1440p on a 9.7".
- What's the ideal minimum quality for 10.5" and 12.9"?
4. Lastly, anyone has any idea if the following apps are optimized for the new iPad Pros (10.5" + 12.9") already?
- AVPlayerHD (my de facto video app of choice with customized swipe gestures)
- YouTube
- Air Video HD
- Spotify
- Toggle
Thank you all in advance for your inputs and discussion.
Food for Thought
The iPad was touted to have a better UI optimized for tablet over the Android counterparts.
Is there a point in getting the 10.5" or 12.9" iPad Pro if most apps you use frequently are not updated to support its resolution? (e.g. wasted space all over and apps not looking right = user experience suffers)
Last edited: