Is it just me, or is the Dual Core 2.0 a better value than the Dual Core 2.3. I placed an order for the DC 2.0 and upgraded the video card to equal the 2.3's for $45, and I'm trying to justify cancelling and going with the 2.3, but it seems that I'd basically be paying $455 for .3 speed increase and 90 gigs of space (I'll probably replace the HD ). Please, let me know if I'm wrong, or if the .3 increase is that important, as I do quite a bit of video work (I do Mini DV, no SD or HD). I used a Dual P. 2.0 before, but had to sell it months ago. I'm comparing this to the last go-round, where the big knock on the low-end was the crippled motherboard, which isn't the case this time. I'm surprised more people aren't talking about this, but maybe I'm missing something. Thanks again. It's good to be back in the fray after several months without a Mac.