Deals: Apple Studio Display With Standard Glass Drops to $1,349.99 on Amazon ($249 Off)

[MacRumors]

Following a few deals on the nano-texture glass version of the Apple Studio Display last month, today Amazon has the standard glass option of the display for $1,349.99, down from $1,599.00. Amazon provides an estimated June 6 date for deliveries to most United States residences.

Note: MacRumors is an affiliate partner with some of these vendors. When you click a link and make a purchase, we may receive a small payment, which helps us keep the site running.

This deal is offering a second-best price on the standard glass version of the Apple Studio Display, and it's only available with the basic tilt-adjustable stand option. As of writing, we aren't tracking any notable discounts on the nano-texture glass Apple Studio Display.

Apple Studio Display (Standard Glass) for $1,349.99 ($249 OFF)​

The main difference between the standard glass and the upgrade to nano-texture glass options has to do with minimizing glare, with Apple stating that the nano-texture option is ideal for workspaces with bright lighting. Both versions feature a 27-inch 5K retina display, a built-in A13 Bionic chip to power the camera and audio systems, a 12-megapixel f/2.4 Ultra Wide camera, and more.

Be sure to visit our full Deals Roundup to shop for even more Apple-related products and accessories.

Article Link: Deals: Apple Studio Display With Standard Glass Drops to $1,349.99 on Amazon ($249 Off)

 

[Spaceboi Scaphandre]

Still way too much. This meme should be under $1000.

 

[citysnaps]

A good deal for a great display. I use mine daily for editing/processing photos and am super pleased.

 

[MacWiz_007]

What a killer deal...not! 🤣

 

[msackey]

What a killer deal...not! 🤣

Well, to be fair, it is a deal that could kill ya! ;-) LOL

 

[doboy]

They are just matching Costco's price.

 

[floral]

Still way too much. This meme should be under $1000.

I would buy it if it was $500.

I mean... A13 Bionic? That has to be at least 3 years old by now.

 

[msackey]

I would buy it if it was $500.

I mean... A13 Bionic? That has to be at least 3 years old by now.

My Apple Thunderbolt Display which I bought years ago was $999. I considered that a very expensive purchase. I did need new monitor but price-wise it was not justifiable to shell out that money unless I thought of it more as a indulgent gift to myself, which I did.

Can't see shelling out $1.3k for this monitor. I'd consider it for less than $1k.

 

[Mr. Dee]

This thing should be between 799 to 899. Apple really was trying to take advantage of the Apple logo clout on this one but not many were fooled.

 

[Shazaam!]

It's OK. We get that you can't afford it.

 

[floral]

This thing should be between 799 to 899. Apple really was trying to take advantage of the Apple logo clout on this one but not many were fooled.

There isn't even an Apple chin on this one. That must be the cause of poor sales :O

 

[skippermonkey]

I really want to upgrade, but my 2010 27" Apple LED Cinema Display is working about as well as it did the day I unboxed it. Astonishing quality and value for money, really – it's cost me about 0.2 pence per day, and growing smaller all the time.

 

[cocoua]

same comments about price as usual,
nobody here can post a link with a monitor under 1000USD with this specs

 

[cocoua]

This thing should be between 799 to 899. Apple really was trying to take advantage of the Apple logo clout on this one but not many were fooled.

Your signature is really trying to take advantage of the Apple logo clout on this one but not many were fooled

 

[greenbreadmmm]

same comments about price as usual,
nobody here can post a link with a monitor under 1000USD with this specs

Really hoping the Samsung S9 hits that mark.

 

[BB1970]

I like how people say it’s too much, thinking there’s so many 5k displays to choose from.

 

[citysnaps]

My Apple Thunderbolt Display which I bought years ago was $999. I considered that a very expensive purchase. I did need new monitor but price-wise it was not justifiable to shell out that money unless I thought of it more as a indulgent gift to myself, which I did.

Can't see shelling out $1.3k for this monitor. I'd consider it for less than $1k.

Sadly, there's been "years ago" inflation over the years, along with Apple salary and benefits increases and other operating costs over the years.

It's where we are today. Apple is not immune.

 

[falkon-engine]

if it had 120 Hz VRR I would consider it, but alas, it does not, so no thanks.

 

[tstafford]

The ASD is the most triggering Apple device on the market. Really frustrates people in both directions.

 

[foo2]

Order placed, Costco. Wanted the VESA mount one, not willing to spend another $250 or so for it. Done.

 

[rpmurray]

Has anyone tried to open one of these up and stick a Mac Mini logic board inside?

 

[Mr. Dee]

Your signature is really trying to take advantage of the Apple logo clout on this one but not many were fooled

Job applications are sent to Apple Inc. One Apple Park Way. Cupertino, CA 95014. United States, they are no good here. Have a nice day.

 

[sockdoggy]

New Pro display announcement next week? May result in permanent price decrease on Studio Display.

 

[tstafford]

New Pro display announcement next week? May result in permanent price decrease on Studio Display.

A new Pro display announcement would be terrific. Drive down used prices on XDR and make the new Dell irrelevant.

 

[doboy]

Would've bought one instantly if it was 32". The XDR Pro is bit too expensive for my taste and needs.