Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
does anyone actually think that people will ever ever start referring all HD-based music players as iPods?

I certainly think its possible.
Really, your average consumer either calls it a MP3 player, or an iPod. Nobody knows the name of all these other players.
 
Originally posted by micvog

Right now, Apple's biggest problem appears to be making iPods fast enough. Amazon.com was out of stock earlier this week (I am not sure about now). My local Best Buy only has 40GB units in stock; same for CompUSA. My local Robinsons-May is completely out.
heheheh... we bought 4 40GB ipods for the holidays. .
 
Originally posted by Arcady
I tried to order a 30gb iPod from Dell two months ago. (We had a Dell loan, and there was enough left to stick an iPod in the order.) Anyway, after a month of the runaround, they finally decided they could not deliver it, and offered me some Archos thing instead.

So, Dell was listing iPods two months ago, but stopped selling them right after that.

I got my 40 GB back in Nov from Dell, only reason I did so was that dell was selling it for $409 which was way cheaper than anywhere else. I figured Apple must have gotten peeved and cut Dell off as a retailer. Or Dell knew they weren't going to carry it much longer and discounted that batch.
 
A manufacturer cannot control the pricing of their product; they can only control what they sell it for. Once that has happened, they are out of it.
 
Originally posted by iChan
reminds me of the comment about the Lord of the Rings, "the world is divided into two halves, those who have read the Lord of the Rings, and those who have yet to read the Lord of the Rings" (paraphrasing a bit)

I assume that this is where the iPod quote derives from... to have the iPod written about in the New York Times in the same esteem as the Lord of the Rings really cements the ipods already legendary status...



however, if Apple continue to lose big channels of distribution, then we might have to kiss goodbye the notion that ipod will reach mass penetration... sales-wise i mean.

Dont forget that the iPod is also sold world wide and not soley through Dell. Virgin Music stores in the UK sell iPods, we have a number or appliance stores in NZ that sell iPods although not in any great numbers as they dont have it on display. I think also the fact that there are so many channels now that promote iTunes and iTMS that it wont be a huge factor. Amazon.com and .co.uk both sell iPods and they would both be a pretty major distribution channels
 
Originally posted by dmbream
Yes and yes.

My friend just got a new BMW. He was happy to discover that the stock sound system in the car has a line-in jack for attaching portable audio devices directly, without the need for cassette adapters, FM transmitters, etc.

In the car's manual, the instructions for attaching devices goes roughly as follows:

"Your car is equipped with a line-in jack...for attaching your iPod."

Not "portable hard drive-based digital music player," but "iPod."

It's gaining momentum, and should the fadness of the iPod hold on for a little longer, it should become part of the varnacular.

I'm waiting to hear "Please turn off your iPod for takeoff" on an airplane. That usually means "you've made it" in terms of owning the lingo. The terms "Gameboy" and "Walkman" are typically used universally when referring to proucts in either catagory.

BMW the ultimate driving machine
 
Originally posted by Lanbrown
A manufacturer cannot control the pricing of their product; they can only control what they sell it for. Once that has happened, they are out of it.
Whoo... where have you been? First, a manufacturer can easily have it in a contract with their distributors/retailers that anyone who charges under MSRP never gets another shipment... while not "direct" control, its pretty darn effective, no?

Second, how often do you see anyone offering discounts from MSRP for Apple products? Dell did it - and now they're out of that market. Amazon does it very occasionally. Circuit City did it for a couple of days on the iPod, then it went away. Apple controls their retailers very strictly, the same way that companies like Bose do (and believe me, that's not flattering company to be in).

-Richard
 
Originally posted by iChan
the walkman reached a stage where all personal cassette players were referred to as Walkmen, like a Hoover for vacuum cleaner and Rollerblades for inline skates, or tip-ex for correction fluid or (you get the picture, does anyone actually think that people will ever ever start referring all HD-based music players as iPods? I don't know think so.

Mt girlfriend, and plenty of others do.

You have to understand that you are one of the technology literate / geek.

*hint*

My girlfriend, and ALL THE OTHERS that call any mp3 player an iPod don't visit this site, and take time out to type comments.

They couldn't care less.
 
Originally posted by rjstanford
Whoo... where have you been? First, a manufacturer can easily have it in a contract with their distributors/retailers that anyone who charges under MSRP never gets another shipment... while not "direct" control, its pretty darn effective, no?

Second, how often do you see anyone offering discounts from MSRP for Apple products? Dell did it - and now they're out of that market. Amazon does it very occasionally. Circuit City did it for a couple of days on the iPod, then it went away. Apple controls their retailers very strictly, the same way that companies like Bose do (and believe me, that's not flattering company to be in).

-Richard
Right.. He was thinking of price fixing, but that's between resellers.. Not wholesaler, OEM's and resellers.
 
Seems a little petty to me, but then from a business standpoint at this point it makes sense--who in thier right mind would buy a Dell player when it's sitting next to an iPod with a steep discount? And you gotta believe that with that gouging on the iPod Dell wasn't making much off of it--more of a draw, I'd expect.
 
Originally posted by Arcady
I tried to order a 30gb iPod from Dell two months ago. (We had a Dell loan, and there was enough left to stick an iPod in the order.) Anyway, after a month of the runaround, they finally decided they could not deliver it, and offered me some Archos thing instead.

So, Dell was listing iPods two months ago, but stopped selling them right after that.
Are you sure it wasn't because the 30gb were discontinued by Apple right around that same time? Maybe Dell couldn't supply them because Apple wasn't making them anymore?
 
Originally posted by rjstanford
Whoo... where have you been? First, a manufacturer can easily have it in a contract with their distributors/retailers that anyone who charges under MSRP never gets another shipment... while not "direct" control, its pretty darn effective, no?

Second, how often do you see anyone offering discounts from MSRP for Apple products? Dell did it - and now they're out of that market. Amazon does it very occasionally. Circuit City did it for a couple of days on the iPod, then it went away. Apple controls their retailers very strictly, the same way that companies like Bose do (and believe me, that's not flattering company to be in).

-Richard

You are wrong, if the manufacturer controls the price, its considered price fixing. Car dealers like to jack the price of a high demand vehicle up and the manufacturers do not like that. Guess what, they have no say what the dealer does. If the dealer wants to jack the prices up, they can. The scenario you have provided is called price-fixing. You need to brush up on your law Section 5(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act says this "Unfair methods of competition in commerce, and unlawful or deceptive acts or practices in commerce, are declared unlawful" and in the AMWAY case, this is what a judge ruled. "Combining and conspiring to fix resale prices is a prohibited act, says this Judge, says this Commission, and says hundreds of cases before and after the Amway case. The price fixing lesson from this case can be looked at from three viewpoints, the MLM or Direct Selling Company, the Distributor, in his or her relationship to the Company whose products or services the distributorship sells, and the Distributor in his or her relationship to other distributors.

A company has an absolute right to SET prices. SETTING prices is not FIXING prices. Combinations or conspiracies are needed to FIX prices and one cannot combine or conspire with one self. No matter how many employees of ABC Company sit around the conference table deciding what to charge for the new widget, it is not a conspiracy. However, no independent contractor distributor of the company should ever be at such a meeting. All of the company's employees are part of one legal entity, the corporation, for purposes of deciding whether "two or more persons" conspired to do anything. Have a distributor, or a competitor, or a supplier, or a visitor on a plant tour for that matter attend, and the requirement of "two or more persons" has been met. This, of course, is not automatically an illegal conspiracy, by why even take the chance. The classic example is two or more COMPETITORS agreeing to fix prices, usually to damage a third competitor or just to line their pockets at the expense of the consuming public. The variation on the classic theme, also prohibited by law, is retail price maintenance. It usually involves one manufacturer, with or without the knowing cooperation of one or more of its distributors. It can also involve just two or more distributors.

A company can unilaterally publish SUGGESTED retail prices. A company CANNOT do anything to require that its independent sales force sell at the prices suggested by the company. Amway's practices in the early Sixties were deemed to be illegal acts intended to maintain the retail price of its products.

It is on the issue of retail price maintenance that the Amway case becomes very specific. The Judge writes: "The Rules of Conduct of the Amway Sales Plan published in 1963 required that distributors sell Amway products to consumers at the specified resale price. It also provided that no unauthorized discount be given on sales to other distributors, and fixed the resale charge for freight. The record does not show when Amway stopped using this sales manual or whether distributors were ever clearly notified that it does not express Amway's policy. Such resale price maintenance is per se unlawful.""

Do you know what MSRP stands for? Manufacturers Suggested Retail Price. The key word there is suggested. If a company could control the price, it would be called the MMRP, Manufacturers Mandated Retail Price.
 
Originally posted by pgwalsh
Right.. He was thinking of price fixing, but that's between resellers.. Not wholesaler, OEM's and resellers.

No its not, price-fixing goes beyond just resellers.
 
Dell stopped selling iPods for multiple reasons, I'm sure. The biggest would be the obvious conflict with their own product. Dell sells just about anything, but as soon as they can get a Dell-branded version they will cut out the other manufacturers when possible. Often, it's the same manufacturer putting Dell's name on the product.

Pricewise, Dell probably was taking losses on the iPods every time they sold them cheap. Why have two competing products, with the most popular one netting you either no money or negative money, and one with a large profit margin and not yet established in the marketplace... it just wouldn't make business sense. Dell is relying on people who either don't know the iPod or think that the Dell is just as good (Dell caters to the non-tech-savvy).

As for Apple setting prices, they can and do. If you notice, the online retailers can't drop the price more than $5 below Apple's retail price, or they could/will lose their reseller status. That's why Macmall and such use other promos, like free ram or free printers (and then they charge an installation fee for ram that is almost as much as the price of the ram itself).
 
Originally posted by Lanbrown
No its not, price-fixing goes beyond just resellers.
yes.. it does, but it includes one or more companies or businesses to maintain a specific price...
 
Originally posted by Lanbrown
A manufacturer cannot control the pricing of their product; they can only control what they sell it for. Once that has happened, they are out of it.

Not true. Purchase agreements can include such language.

edit:
Ok, I read up on the FTC Act.
If this activity is illegal then how do you explain game console prices? That's price fixing....
 
Originally posted by iChan
...does anyone actually think that people will ever ever start referring all HD-based music players as iPods? I don't know think so.

Though many others have already said it, i'll say it too, Yes. I've even heard of non-HD based mp3 players as referred to as iPods. I think iPod is here to stay.
 
Originally posted by rjstanford
Whoo... where have you been? First, a manufacturer can easily have it in a contract with their distributors/retailers that anyone who charges under MSRP never gets another shipment... while not "direct" control, its pretty darn effective, no?

Second, how often do you see anyone offering discounts from MSRP for Apple products? Dell did it - and now they're out of that market. Amazon does it very occasionally. Circuit City did it for a couple of days on the iPod, then it went away. Apple controls their retailers very strictly, the same way that companies like Bose do (and believe me, that's not flattering company to be in).


The reason that you find very few discounts on the msrp on apple's products including iPod is not quite as you describe. It all comes down to margin. Resellers make very little money out of selling an iPod especially when compared to competitors products such as the creative zen etc. The reason apple can justify this to the resellers is that iPod practically sells itself and they sell in very large volume. Therefore the although the %age margin onj ipod is low the cash margin is quite high due to sheer volume of sales.
-Richard
 
Slight c@*k up in the quoting department today.
My point is that if any reseller sells an ipod for $30 less than msrp then they are losing money.
 
Personal reasons?

In addition to the business rationale of giving more attention to its fledgling, misshapen mp3 player, Dell might have personal reasons, too.

After all, it's scarcely a month since Jobs (in that very intriguing NY Times Magazine piece) mocked Michael Dell for being unable to dance. ;-)
 
I think it's pretty clear that dell "dropped" apple because apple stopped supplying them with ipods (in an effort to curb discounting for whatever reason...).

It's the old 'you're fired, I quit' scenario.
 
one certainly can't blame dell for not wanting to sell it top rival as well as a better product than their own.

apple's presence in target stores as well as best buy is far more valuable than dell, not to mention the quality of their own apple stores.
 
the term price fixing is not setting a set price for an individual product from an individual company. rather, it would be a bunch of companies such as apple and dell and several other HD-music players joining together with the intent of jacking up the prices of the entire market in attempt to increase profits.

hmm doesnt this sound familiar? gas prices have been pretty high this year... 🙄 🙄 🙄 well just kidding but you get the idea right?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.