Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
On this point, Apple does a lousy job. They can't even properly set their schedules to deliver computers and music players in sufficient quantities. They can't seem to secure multiple suppliers for their components nor anticipate growing demands.
 
Timelessblur said:
lightly yes but most of this offence are how do I put it should be a slap on the wrist. Most of the software on my computer is fully legit and a far chunk of the music. 0 movies just TV shows that I download because I not around but they are weekly TV shows.

Before you thow any stones a fair question is do you own or have anythign that is questionble in nature to even illegle. Some people go over board. I not a full fleg pirated I have some mnior things but having just one thing on the computer that is pirated or not legal makes it hipicrical of me to bash some who does things.


I just think they are going overboard and really to agressivly come on sueing some who has 0 access to the stuff. Sueing a 12 year old the list goes on about this really bad law suits and how overboard it goes on.
Short answer: If it's copyright, I own it.

As I said, the companies involved have to set the legal precedent that they are actively protecting their IP. They are not out to ruin that 12 year old's life or drive his/her family into bankruptcy. They are trying to make a point, and judging from your reaction to all this, they have succeeded.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.