Too bad Apple got in first,
Apple did not get in first, they got in at the right time with the right product and vision.
That's always what Apple does and they're amazing at doing it.
Too bad Apple got in first,
Corporations are testing it...I agree...but the product has been available for about 5 months...it may be in a handful of businesses deployed (and deployed as what?...a cool toy for the CEO? A laptop replacement for the Marketing person that surfs the web/blogs all day?) but mostly it is being tested. And there's nothing wrong with my examples...no shame.
You may technically able to say that because 1 business owns it, it's "in the business world" but in reality, it's not. In 1-3 years we will know how often they are deployed and WHAT BUSINESS CASE the iPads are being used.
Desktops and laptops do a LOT more in the business world than let Frank surf the internet...there are thick client apps (that I assume in some shape may be converted to iPad apps), network share drives, network printing, local software demos, thick-client email (Outlook, Notes) that web-based email just can't provide all the features needed, and lastly, pure storage (all your MS Office docs for example), corporate chat, Camtasia/Youtube/video creation, an industry adopted browser (IE or Firefox), projector output, etc. Those are some examples. And let's not forget that IT in all businesses likes to have control over pushing security patches to machines...in an easy and user-friendly manner to both IT and end users.
For instance, in my role, I work with all day long:
Camtasia
VMWare Workstation
Remote desktop
FTP
Chat
Thick client email application due to complex calendaring
VPN when not in office
Need to use both IE and Firefox
WinRAR/Winzip to compress things
MS Office
Screen capture ability
Printing
It's going to take some vision. The iPad can be many things, in its current state, but it's still missing some things that might help. This Dell looks pointless for real work, and no future seems evident.What I see, however, is that the tablet industry is far larger than a personal mp3 player...the vendors are not going to go down without a big fight. This means better pricing, features, and competitiveness for all and pure win for the consumer. Back to my point, however, is that if Apple doesn't quickly get into the corporate market, the iPad is going to be just for consumers (which may be perfectly fine for Apple)...and unfortunately for Apple it will be yet another 1% marketshare for business (like the Macs) and 95% marketshare for Wintel units.
This touch tablet market is going to explode and I, for one, am super excited for the years to come.
Yes, if Apple plays its cards right and gets the iPad (a tablet) into the business world,
It is, is it not? In terms of function (not viewing pleasure/ease) what does the iPad do that the iPod can't? However, ironically, this is no longer a valid argument since the iPod can do a bunch more than the iPad now. That said, I don't really think it is complaining per se, just pointing out a fact.