I really dont undestand when people year after year make predictions of "Low Cost" iPhone...do you along with others dont see why apple doesnt need to redesign a "WHOLE NEW" iPhone to be cheap when they are/can just use the previous gen as the "Cheap" iPhone? Its the most sensible option as its always been...
iPhone 4S 16GB = $450 or $0 on Contract
iPhone 5 16GB/32GB = $549/$599 or $99 on Contract (Will drop to $0 within approx 6 months of 5S/6 launch)
iPhone 5S 16GB = $649 or $199 on Contract (takes about 6 months then shows up for $149 on Contract)
iPhone 5S 32GB = $749 or $299 on Contract...
What really makes people think that the "CHEAP" iPhone will be better than iPhone 5 or 4S? wouldnt it be TOO CHEAP to be comparable? because I can already see people complaining about the "Cheap" iPhone being TOO CHEAP for their liking....
However I would like to ask all what is your definition of "Light/Cheap"? because at the end of the day we pay for Quality....wouldn't we go to Samsung or HTC if we wanted "Cheap" as in reality you really get what you pay for...?
We have shuffles, nanos, minis, and airs. An iPhone light is really not that far-fetched. It's hard to say what cheap is, especially in Apple terms.
Personally, I was surprised by the pricing of the mini. Only time will tell. I am fairly confident, however, that we will be seeing a cheaper iphone this fall.
I dont think the angle apple will be going for is 'ITS A CHEAPER IPHONE FOR EMERGING AND DEVELOPING MARKETS' I think as with every cheaper product they offer it will be justified.
Last edited: