Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How about GPU performance? That has always been the bottleneck for Windows virtualization on Macs.

The vast majority of Windows systems are sold with just the integrated GPU, which is crap, in its first attempt Apple has multiplied by 5 Intels iGPU offering, I would think with the unified memory the VM would have access to the full chip.
 
Have you tried launching it and see what it does? Maybe it just runs and all you need is a Windows on Arm iso.
This is what happens...
Screen Shot 2020-11-27 at 10.42.06 AM.png

My guess is that it was compiled and shipped as a universal app because macOS is a single image for both Intel and M series Macs.
 
Thatis a good new. I'm in the line between take a 16" 5600 or wait to new M1 or redesigned model. One day I woke up decided to buy the intel one, one hour later I'm decided to wait to a possible imminent refresh, one more hour later I'm decided to wait long more to the redesigned one, in five minutes I overhaul the 16"5600 specs and opinions and finally I see the apple trees through the maniconm window. 🤪🤪
 
In the end, it will come down to Microsoft licensing. My guess there are some deals already being worked out. I doubt Parallels would spend the engineering resources to bring it to the M1 chip to only virtualize Linux. As I think that is a very, very small use case compared to Windows.
I was going to ask about Linux, as far as I know, Linux natively supports ARM, and it wouldn't cost anything as windows would for licensing. I would like to see Linux as an option on M1 Macs, as well as maybe FreeBSD. I say this, because I have really gotten to like the Unix environment from learning it through Mac OS X, and then learning further in Linux. The other advantage I see is being able to have a more standard Unix / Linux OS as an alternative to macOS without needing a whole separate computer. This is one thing I've always enjoyed about the Mac, it has always been flexible to run other operating systems besides it's own. However going the other way, with a non apple branded computer, you'd get other operating systems without native macOS support. So, that's why I say the Mac is good for a cross platform machine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vmistery
Maybe the solution here is for Apple to just sell a line of Intel computers forever.
To be able to support Windows? Not happening.

Seeing how ARM is taking off, I don’t see a scenario where Windows for X86 is not overtaken by Windows on ARM in 5-6 years. X86 will be emulation only at that point. ARM Macs is just what Microsoft needs to push this agenda forward. Without it, few people had a real reason to get an ARM PC. In a few years, Windows users will have to switch to ARM just to keep up. Just like when Apple had to switch to Intel, it won’t be a choice. It’s just that the tables have turned.
 
To be able to support Windows? Not happening.

Seeing how ARM is taking off, I don’t see a scenario where Windows for X86 is not overtaken by Windows on ARM in 5-6 years. X86 will be emulation only at that point. ARM Macs is just what Microsoft needs to push this agenda forward. Without it, few people had a real reason to get an ARM PC. In a few years, Windows users will have to switch to ARM just to keep up. Just like when Apple had to switch to Intel, it won’t be a choice. It’s just that the tables have turned.
It’s also what people were saying when Apple launched the G5. So many pundits were saying that Windows will have no choice but to move to PowerPC and that all gaming consoles were already going there. It did not happened, X86 adapted and survived. Although a new platform is always an exciting prospect, one has to remember that X86 survived Motorola 68000, motorola 88000, PowerPC, Itanium. With the right motivation it can survive ARM too.
 
This is not that big of a news. Windows lacks something like Rosetta so running the ARM version is much more painful. You can't run x86 apps.
But they do its called UWP (Universal Windows App) The Rosetta Equivalent is called WOW64 layer https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/winprog64/running-32-bit-applications For now it only run 32 bit windows Applications but x86_64 is coming to Arm64 Windows https://www.neowin.net/news/it039s-official-x64-emulation-is-coming-to-windows-on-arm/
 
It's unlikely that the 4 less powerful core is usable on Windows 10.

Microsoft didn't publish the data how many percentage of battery life it saved and if it is compatible at all.

Since your comment and opinion is more important than everybody elses and deserves to stand out, I just wanted to thank you for using large text - especially in your signature. If you hadn't done that I might have missed them!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.