You'll need an ARM binary of the game. Since ARM Windows was never available to consumers, I doubt their are any ARM binary copies of that game.How about running full screen Windows games from the 2000s like UT2004? Cant run this on 64bit Macs anymore.
The ARM version of windows has x86 emulation a la Rosetta 2, though not as fast (as the article notes as well)You'll need an ARM binary of the game. Since ARM Windows was never available to consumers, I doubt their are any ARM binary copies of that game.
How about GPU performance? That has always been the bottleneck for Windows virtualization on Macs.
Have you tried launching it and see what it does? Maybe it just runs and all you need is a Windows on Arm iso.Meanwhile, on my M1 Mac mini:
View attachment 1681100
I wonder why they made the effort to compile and install it as a default app...
That’s a pity. It could have been a fun experiment.This is what happens...
View attachment 1681160
My guess is that it was compiled and shipped as a universal app because macOS is a single image for both Intel and M series Macs.
How about running full screen Windows games from the 2000s like UT2004? Cant run this on 64bit Macs anymore.
I was going to ask about Linux, as far as I know, Linux natively supports ARM, and it wouldn't cost anything as windows would for licensing. I would like to see Linux as an option on M1 Macs, as well as maybe FreeBSD. I say this, because I have really gotten to like the Unix environment from learning it through Mac OS X, and then learning further in Linux. The other advantage I see is being able to have a more standard Unix / Linux OS as an alternative to macOS without needing a whole separate computer. This is one thing I've always enjoyed about the Mac, it has always been flexible to run other operating systems besides it's own. However going the other way, with a non apple branded computer, you'd get other operating systems without native macOS support. So, that's why I say the Mac is good for a cross platform machine.In the end, it will come down to Microsoft licensing. My guess there are some deals already being worked out. I doubt Parallels would spend the engineering resources to bring it to the M1 chip to only virtualize Linux. As I think that is a very, very small use case compared to Windows.
To be able to support Windows? Not happening.Maybe the solution here is for Apple to just sell a line of Intel computers forever.
It’s also what people were saying when Apple launched the G5. So many pundits were saying that Windows will have no choice but to move to PowerPC and that all gaming consoles were already going there. It did not happened, X86 adapted and survived. Although a new platform is always an exciting prospect, one has to remember that X86 survived Motorola 68000, motorola 88000, PowerPC, Itanium. With the right motivation it can survive ARM too.To be able to support Windows? Not happening.
Seeing how ARM is taking off, I don’t see a scenario where Windows for X86 is not overtaken by Windows on ARM in 5-6 years. X86 will be emulation only at that point. ARM Macs is just what Microsoft needs to push this agenda forward. Without it, few people had a real reason to get an ARM PC. In a few years, Windows users will have to switch to ARM just to keep up. Just like when Apple had to switch to Intel, it won’t be a choice. It’s just that the tables have turned.
But they do its called UWP (Universal Windows App)This is not that big of a news. Windows lacks something like Rosetta so running the ARM version is much more painful. You can't run x86 apps.
It's unlikely that the 4 less powerful core is usable on Windows 10.
Microsoft didn't publish the data how many percentage of battery life it saved and if it is compatible at all.
No they’re not.There is an ARM version of Windows. The Snapdragon 865 already runs on Microsoft Windows 10 Pro. its existed for quite some time. Snapdragon just needs to catch up to Apple A14 performance. It will happen.
Samsung phones are now equal or better than iPhone now
You can't run 64 bit application now.Actually it does have something like Rosetta 2 (just not as good). From the article: "Windows ARM64 can run x86 applications really well. It's not as fast as Rosetta 2, but close."