Did you enjoy the 32 and 64 gigabyte swap?

Status
Not open for further replies.
N

nouveau-apple

macrumors 6502a
With the iPhone 6, Apple secretly slipped the 64 gigabyte version of the iPhone in and the slipped the 32 gigabyte version out.

It means that you cannot buy a 32 gigabyte iPhone 6 anymore, but you can buy a 64 gigabyte version for the same price as last year's model. And you can't buy a 64 gigabyte version of last year's model.

But I used the 32 gigabyte version and it was perfect. Apple also kept the 16 gigabyte version.
 
What kind of question is that seriously of course everyone will enjoy it cause it's double for the same price
 
nouveau-apple said:
With the iPhone 6, Apple secretly slipped the 64 gigabyte version of the iPhone in and the slipped the 32 gigabyte version out.

It means that you cannot buy a 32 gigabyte iPhone 6 anymore, but you can buy a 64 gigabyte version for the same price as last year's model. And you can't buy a 64 gigabyte version of last year's model.

But I used the 32 gigabyte version and it was perfect. Apple also kept the 16 gigabyte version.
Click to expand...

Personally I would have preferred the 32gb version being the entry level model with no option for 16gb and then followed by the 64gb and 128gb.
 
Should have been 32gb to start with. That is the :apple: Tax that we are paying and use to.
 
I always thought the jumps between models was too high. I always felt it should be $199/16GB, $249/32GB and $299/64GB. So I got what I wanted all along but without the $249 option. I think 32GB will be entry level next year.
 
Hell yes, I enjoyed it! I ran out of space on my iPod touch with 32 GB, and I could only afford the mid tier iPhone 6!
 
I have mixed feelings about this.

On the one hand, it is good to get the extra 32G at the same price.

On the other, since I don't need that much memory, I would have preferred to have a lighter phone without the weight of that extra 32G.
 
nouveau-apple said:
What about the people who wanted 32 gigs but not 64?
Click to expand...

There's no disadvantage to having more storage than you need.

While it can be argued that Apple should have made 32GB base (IMO they should have), but they didn't. At least they're not forcing you to spend $100 more than you would have in the past.
 
McDaddio said:
I have mixed feelings about this.

On the one hand, it is good to get the extra 32G at the same price.

On the other, since I don't need that much memory, I would have preferred to have a lighter phone without the weight of that extra 32G.
Click to expand...

Lol. You've got to be kidding me. Do you seriously think you would feel any weight difference whatsoever between different storage capacities? Better not get a 1TB MacBook, it'll weigh a ton!:rolleyes:
 
Did I enjoy it? I hate it! Complete ********! How dare they give users a better deal. Like what the hell dude? You should be paying Apple extra just cuz they poor.


:rolleyes:
 
iBlazed said:
Lol. You've got to be kidding me. Do you seriously think you would feel any weight difference whatsoever between different storage capacities? Better not get a 1TB MacBook, it'll weigh a ton!:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

??
My wife has a 128 and I have a 64 and I can tell the difference in weight.
Part of it might be because of the different cases and that she has a 6, while I have the plus, but the weight difference between her 128 and my 64 are undeniable.

A 1TB would not weigh a ton since the difference in weight between a 256G and 1TB is not much in relation to the total weight of the MacBook.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top