Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

rekhyt

macrumors 65816
Original poster
I was just browsing the online Apple Store today and saw that there were two processor configurations for the high-end 15" version of the MacBook Pro-2.2 QC i7 and 2.3 QC i7. The difference between the two is ~$285 (In my regional online Apple Store).

The question is, however, what is the difference between the two? Surely an extra 0.1 ghz wouldn't give that much of a boost, wouldn't it?
 
I was just browsing the online Apple Store today and saw that there were two processor configurations for the high-end 15" version of the MacBook Pro-2.2 QC i7 and 2.3 QC i7. The difference between the two is ~$285 (In my regional online Apple Store).

The question is, however, what is the difference between the two? Surely an extra 0.1 ghz wouldn't give that much of a boost, wouldn't it?

really not worth it, unless you absolutely must have every ounce of speed you can get.
 
I agree not really worth the extra cost. At best you are looking at a 4% speed boost which you will not notice in most operations. Rendering video and animation will be at best 4% faster. Use the extra money for Apple care or a 2 drive G-raid or some other gadgets.
 
Go for the 2.0Ghz, and get the high res screen for $100.00

What help does the high res screen have for you? To be honest, I think it is a downgrade instead of an upgrade, because without resolution independence, the default size 12 font and the Apple menubar shrinks so much.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.