Wow! Count me in for this. I’m pretty much iPad only but the unlimited cellular data has a ton to do with that. I’d pay for data on a MacBook even if I didn’t use it as much as my iPad. Options are great to have.
Depends on your use case. I travel a lot and tethering is not viable for connectivity for hours. In addition, 5G connectivity would provide a bit more security than public wifi, even with a VPN. I think it would make a nice option.
If 5G becomes a viable replacement for fibre then a 5G MBP would be a no brainer.
[doublepost=1564760553][/doublepost]
How devices use bandwidth. Computers would place greater demands on the network for longer periods. Having hundreds of people streaming video, downloading large files, etc., often simultaneously on a machine, is not what the network is designed to provide.
I couldn't help but think about this too!Here's an image from a prototype from that 3G era. "This particular machine dates back to 2007 and is a 15-inch MacBook Pro Santa Rosa":
View attachment 851155
Yes thank you finally I found someone who thinks this is dumb as well haha. So far all the comments I've seen are something to the effect of "Oh this is a good idea I'm sure lots of people will use it!" or "Well I think we all knew this was inevitable from Apple!"I don’t think this is going to happen. It’s my understanding the real thing stopping them from including modems is the licensing cost to QUALCOMM. I guess battery/power management as well.
Anyway, I think this rumor is trash.
I have 10GB with my plan. I so rarely use it that I don’t think I have used 10GB in 4 years; however, when I have used it, it has been very convenient.
With an ARM SoC perchance?
Let me guess - only $40/mo per macbook and $60/month if your macbook can be a hotspot. This is because Apple wanted a 30% cut of the cellular charges for macbooks. Apple is constantly testing the waters for higher price points and margins.
My guess is to have carriers help sell them through their stores and their monthly payment options. Having the carriers offer them at $55. A month with contracts will be a lot easier for some people to acquire.I wonder why Apple would do this though. Tethering through the iPhone works basically flawless and is another good selling point for their eco system lock in. Making their devices more autonomous seems to achieve exactly the opposite...
Yes thank you finally I found someone who thinks this is dumb as well haha. So far all the comments I've seen are something to the effect of "Oh this is a good idea I'm sure lots of people will use it!" or "Well I think we all knew this was inevitable from Apple!"
NO!!!!
I'm sorry but..no..this makes no sense! For one thing, think about all the additional SKUs that'll add to inventories (including Apple's). Second, they already have cellular options for all flavors of the iPad and obviously the iPhone which, don't forget, you can use as a hotspot!! And last but not least, Qualcomm. They would almost certainly have to use their modems for something like this and they literally JUST bought Intel's modem business, sooooo yeah...not gonna see a bunch of new MacBooks with cellular (especially 5G) in the next six months or so. Think about how crazy that sounds to say there will be 5G Macs before 5G iPhones...
We've been seeing this rumor pop up every now and then for more than a decade, and they've been wrong every single time.
You may be right, but it could be another selling point for getting people on board ARM based Macs. Especially if it ends up being exclusive to them.Nah they ain’t ready for that yet, I thought they’d ditched the MacBook though?
I don’t think this rumour is true anyway..
I think you are right about Qualcomm royalties being a major factor in preventing laptops having cellular. Since they demanded a % of the purchase price of the device, that is a much bigger amount on high-end laptops than it is on high-end phones. I still would rather tether than pay for a service I would only use a handful of times a year though.That means they can now finally charge a premium for cellular connectivity in a laptop without having to pay Qualcomm royalties based on that laptop's MSRP.
Man will have colonized Mars before that occurs...just sayin’!Now it’s Verizon/AT&T/T-Mobile’s turn to make data affordable.
I wonder why Apple would do this though. Tethering through the iPhone works basically flawless and is another good selling point for their eco system lock in. Making their devices more autonomous seems to achieve exactly the opposite...
So, and the modem in the iPad has exactly what to do with a Macbook? Absolutely nothing. Hotspot is more like an "emergency internet access" not an everyday solution. And for people who travel a lot an integrated modem is just perfect. Trust me, I have one in my Dell. Everytime I'm not at home I don't need to bother with WiFi. Internet is there as soon as you login. Not relying on WiFis also means better security no retarded Firewall and no Captive Portal that kicks you and you wonder why the emails don't go through.I'm sorry but..no..this makes no sense! For one thing, think about all the additional SKUs that'll add to inventories (including Apple's). Second, they already have cellular options for all flavors of the iPad and obviously the iPhone which, don't forget, you can use as a hotspot!! And last but not least, Qualcomm. They would almost certainly have to use their modems for something like this and they literally JUST bought Intel's modem business, sooooo yeah...not gonna see a bunch of new MacBooks with cellular (especially 5G) in the next six months or so. Think about how crazy that sounds to say there will be 5G Macs before 5G iPhones...
The answer?
Courage.
Courage to remove Wi-Fi from the Macbook.
I doubt this will happen any time soon. In the future providers will be offering "in-house" 5G services to corporations to replace WiFi using the millimetre band (more secure and more bandwidth available than even on the 5Ghz WiFi band) but this is still in development.
I wonder why Apple would do this though. Tethering through the iPhone works basically flawless and is another good selling point for their eco system lock in. Making their devices more autonomous seems to achieve exactly the opposite...