Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Avlor

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Aug 27, 2010
20
0
Hey all,

I'm new to mac, have been using mine for only three months now, but couldn't help noticing a strange thing. When I go to Disk Utility or cmd+i on a selected partition, the size reported by OSX is incorrect. E.g. I have a 250GB disk, so I'm used to seeing 232GB as usable disk space, which is a totally normal thing. However, OSX tells me that my disk is actually 250GB. More advanced partition utilities (currently I'm using iPartition but suggestions are welcome) report the disk size correctly. So I began to doubt whether folder sizes are reported correctly or "scaled up" to match the size of the disk?
E.g. if I was an ignorant consumer and tried to put 250GB worth of data on the disk, it wouldn't fit as there is not enough physical capacity to accommodate it, is that right?
Is it the normal behaviour or I screwed something up in the system?
 
Snow Leopard introduced the ever so wonderful (terrible) base 10 reporting for disk/file sizes. Not all applications (even Apple's) will report it under base 10.
 
I hate base-10 too. Worst decision by Apple ever. I couldn't care less whatever format wins over in the end, just as long as everyone USES THE SAME EFFING ONE. Check this link for base-2 10.6. Hopefully he'll get round to updating it for 10.6.6 soon!
 
Thanks Jimmy, that link is very promising. I reckon I should NOT try installing a 10.6.5 version, right?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.