That’s like claiming opium is good because it provides more vegan options.This should be pretty good - more choice on plans/tiers is welcome.
As opposed to Disney... not making HD or 4K available on Macs at all?
This is actually from Apple. Apple will only let you watch 4k content on iphones, ipads or apple Tv’s.It isn’t? I haven’t tried. I only watch it on TV
They are pretty annoying and they don't work on me. I can confidently say that no TV ad has ever persuaded me to go out and buy something.
Ditto. I've gladly paid more to NOT deal with ads. Some have said that "that was part of the plan". However, it's worth noting that on Hulu, they make far more money on the "with-ads" plan than "ad-free". Even if you get "with-ads" for free!How long will the four minutes per hour last? There is only one direction ad time goes.
What amuses me as I watch this field mature is that we are heading back to where we started. For a brief time we escaped from ads thanks to DVRs. I encounter so few TV ads these days that when I do encounter them I find them to be an all out assault on my senses, besides being generally an insult to my intelligence. I’d rather watch nothing than ever suffer through ads again.
Disney has yet to reveal the price of the ad-supported plan, which is set to debut in the U.S. in late 2022, but Disney executives suggested during the company's recent earnings call that once the cheaper plan launches there will likely be a price increase to the existing ad-free plan, which is currently $7.99 a month.
YMMV. If you don't watch that much, then I can see that. Me.. it took me one month to catch up on 4 seasons of backlog from The Simpsons and a few other movies, alone. I would probably need a few more months for the Star Wars series (2 to 3 seasons of The Clone Wars, but the entireties of Rebels, Mandalorian, etc.)Disney is the service you really only need one month a year to catch up. Maybe they are all like that.
LOLHow about put all the ads at the beginning. Then people can watch the shows or movies uninterrupted.
"The suspension of its business in Russia cost it 700,000 subscribers, and without that loss, Netflix would have added 500,000 paid global users"Netflix is planning to introduce a new ad-supported tier... it is hemorrhaging subscribers.
It's even more hilarious and crazy when many people who admittedly hated cable TV for pricey pricey subscription rates to then switch to multiple streaming subscription services and actually pay more than cable TV subscription rates.It’s hilarious watching streaming come full circle.
It’s pretty much TV on-demand.
I don't have a strict policy on "if you pay, there should be absolutely no ads". However, the ads have to be mild enough. YouTube has been the only SS I could put up with in that regard. Hulu and Paramount Plus OTOH... awful. Even when I had the former for $2 a month, and the latter is still free for the year, I'm not incentivized to use it. Only if I have nothing else to do.Isn't this what anyone who's ever taken out a plan from a cable or satellite TV operator has always done? You pay for the service and they have ads on them. No major difference here.
To play devil's advocate on multiple fronts...It's even more hilarious and crazy when many people who admittedly hated cable TV for pricey pricey subscription rates to then switch to multiple streaming subscription services and actually pay more than cable TV subscription rates.
I'm sure advertisers would be lining up in droves to pay for those ads.How about put all the ads at the beginning. Then people can watch the shows or movies uninterrupted.
But is anyone surprised? It's not like the corporations that run the streamers are any different than the ones who run the TV networks. They're all middlemen who buy up (or finance the creation of) creative content, sell viewers access to it, and sell advertisers access to the viewers. Same as it's always been, but dressed up in new clothes.It’s pretty sad when you think about it. The only difference is the delivery method, and the fact that each service is its own company (for the most part).
At least we aren’t just litteraly paying to watch ads… yet.
I had a TV at one point that had a cool little commercial timer on the remote. You'd press it once for each commercial you thought there might be (you start to get a feel for it once you start counting) and it would add 30 seconds to the timer. Then you could change channels to watch something else for a few minutes, and when the timer ran out, it would flip you back to the channel you were on. If you had counted right you'd rejoin your show right when it came back on.There are too many commercials, and they are TOO DAMN LOUD!!!
Watch an unedited episode of the old Star Trek episodes, they run minutes longer with today's required dose of commercials. There was also a regulation put in place to stop broadcasters hiking the volume of commercials, and somehow it was eliminated. It's amazing to me that advertisers think that by YELLING AT VIEWERS, viewers will be more likely to buy their crap. Some commercials are REALLY LOUD, and some networks are noticeably louder than others, the Weather Channel being one of them, at least on my provider (U-Verse). There was even legislation in the works years ago to apply an audio 'tag' so that people could mute their TV to bypass the audio from the commercial, and so people recording content could have their recorder automatically pause at the start of a commercial block and resume recording after it was over. It was slaughtered by the bought DC establishment who also gave us direct to consumer pharmaceutical drug adverts.
I'm all in favor of doing away with ALL commercials, and having a 'commercial channel' (like all the junk selling channels like 'QVC'). I'm sure there will be people who will watch them. Heck, my mom was hooked on QVC. (Their crab cakes were heinous)
To expand on this, consider brand recognition. When presented with two options we tend to perceive more value in a brand we recognize. This means we are willing to pay more for the same procedure, and more likely to select it over an identical product at the same price. Lucky cigarettes is the textbook example of being influenced by ads despite not caring about brands.That's generally not expected. Though ad campaigns do generate some immediate sales the real purpose is more nefarious. Ads are designed to affect our mind in a way we are almost helpless against. Because we are retaining the feeling about a product for an ad we saw out of the corner of the eye and thought we were not even paying attention to. It goes much deeper than even subconscious brand memory/recognition and affect us on a basic level. As humans, ads take advantage of how our minds work and the effect is measurable and proven.
I think you’ll find I hadn’t been responding to you.Just as well I wasn't doing that, then.
Paying for ads? i don't think so...
In MLB and NFL, sure, where the actual formats of the games seem designed around squeezing in adverts. European football has adverts at before and after the match, and at half-time. The game itself goes uninterrupted, thankfully. It's a real culture shock to Europeans when they start trying to get into American sports.It's shocking how little actual "gameplay" there really is in a multi-hour sports broadcast.
Baseball is a 19th Century game. Television was 50+ years in the future.In MLB and NFL, sure, where the actual formats of the games seem designed around squeezing in adverts. European football has adverts at before and after the match, and at half-time. The game itself goes uninterrupted, thankfully. It's a real culture shock to Europeans when they start trying to get into American sports.
Does anybody believe it will stay at 4 minutes? Didn't happen with cable, won't happen with streaming. My only concern is one of the majors opening the floodgates by eliminating its ad-free tier(s) entirely. I almost don't care what it costs to never see a commercial again for the rest of my life.
Heh... some have done this with their own timers. I had an app on my Palm PDA that counts down 'x' # of seconds. Annoyingly enough, this is hard to do these days. The broadcasters knew of this and commercials are now in sync (dunno if they colluded in this regard [shrug])I had a TV at one point that had a cool little commercial timer on the remote. You'd press it once for each commercial you thought there might be (you start to get a feel for it once you start counting) and it would add 30 seconds to the timer. Then you could change channels to watch something else for a few minutes, and when the timer ran out, it would flip you back to the channel you were on. If you had counted right you'd rejoin your show right when it came back on.
I've know people who would watch sporting events recorded on DVRs at 1.25x to 1.33x the speed. Saves a nontrivial amount of time, and being sports fan, they do this often enough to add up!I hate ADs with an immense passion.
Even for live sports, which I watch a lot of, I almost always record and get behind and then sit down and skip all the AD breaks and halftime/intermissions.
It's shocking how little actual "gameplay" there really is in a multi-hour sports broadcast.
Finally there is the worst part of this. Ad supported tiers take advantage of the socioeconomic status of low income families.
I think you’ll find that you did.I think you’ll find I hadn’t been responding to you.