Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
55,027
17,408



Disney is in active discussions with AT&T in an effort to acquire the 10 percent ownership stake that WarnerMedia has in Hulu, according to a report by Variety. Disney already owns a 30 percent stake in Hulu, and is soon to gain Fox's 30 percent stake once regulatory approvals for the Disney/20th Century Fox acquisition go through.

hulu-the-good-place.jpg

This means that if Disney does end up with both AT&T and Fox's stakes, it will own a 70 percent majority of the Hulu streaming service. The last remaining company with a stake is Comcast/NBCUniversal, and in a statement last month NBCU CEO Steve Burke said that "Disney would like to buy us out...I don't think anything's going to happen in the near term."

At this point, it's believed that even with a 70 percent control of Hulu, Disney would leave the platform as it is, focused on general entertainment with TV shows and films for subscribers to watch. In contrast, the upcoming Disney+ streaming service will be the platform where customers can get Disney-focused content in a more family-friendly environment.

For AT&T, the company is said to be looking to sell its minority stake in Hulu as it prepares to launch its own streaming service in late 2019. This service will be divided into three tiers: "one focused on movies; one with movies plus original programming; and a third tier comprising content from the first two along with WarnerMedia library content and licensed programming."

Apple's own entry into the streaming service market will happen soon, as the company plans to introduce its TV service at an event on March 25. While we will likely gain a lot of information about the service at that time, it's not expected to launch until the summer or fall of 2019.

Article Link: Disney in Talks to Acquire WarnerMedia's 10% Stake in Hulu, Resulting in 70% Ownership After Fox Acquisition
 

UltimaKilo

macrumors 6502a
Nov 14, 2007
647
504
FL
This space is really starting to heat up.

Apple Music was a great idea which is growing more and more every year and they purchased Beats to get into the space, but Apple seems to be building their video service from the ground up.

I just am not sure, with all the competition, that Apple can be successful here. They would need to strike so many deals in addition to the original content they’re producing.

I do think that if they’re able to strike that deal with the Washington Post, NYT, WallStreet Journal and magazines, Apple could make a nice chunk of change with that service, but this one makes me nervous. Then again, maybe they have something. Really great in the works I don’t know about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Val-kyrie

PickUrPoison

macrumors G3
Sep 12, 2017
8,131
10,721
Sunnyvale, CA
They might leave the Hulu platform alone, but with Fox’s 30% they’re going to be the majority owner, so they can do whatever they want. I would expect to see them offer a Hulu/Disney+ bundle in any case.
 
Last edited:

69Mustang

macrumors 604
Jan 7, 2014
7,874
15,011
In between a rock and a hard place
They might leave the Hulu platform alone, but with Fox’s 30% they’re going to be the majority owner, so they can do whatever they want. I would expect to see them offer a Hulu/Disney+ bundle in any case.
This was my first thought. Hulu would be the only streaming service to view the Disney catalog outside of Disney+. Buy either separate or as you said, get a bundle of both. If another streaming service wanted any of their Disney content - especially MCU stuff... arm, leg, first born, and first born's first born.
 

Mac 128

macrumors 603
Apr 16, 2015
5,360
2,927
Hulu is a major brand name, like HBO, and Netflix, and Disney would be foolish to give it up. A 70% stake is not going to sit well with Comcast, who likely won’t stick around for long as they launch their own streaming service.
 

brofkand

macrumors 6502a
Jun 11, 2006
670
1,332
I have a feeling that we are heading towards a meltdown with these streaming services and unfortunately the consumers are the ones that will lose.

It will all come out in the wash. People will only pay for so many disparate services. They are all fighting to get a piece of the pie and be one of the 3 or 4 who win long term.

There used to be tons of car manufacturers in the US before the depression nowadays there's basically only 5 or 6 as those that survived the depression were bought out or closed. Same thing will happen here, just takes time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlyMackle

appleCakes

macrumors newbie
Jan 6, 2015
13
32
California, USA
This space is really starting to heat up.

Apple Music was a great idea which is growing more and more every year and they purchased Beats to get into the space, but Apple seems to be building their video service from the ground up.

I just am not sure, with all the competition, that Apple can be successful here. They would need to strike so many deals in addition to the original content they’re producing.

I do think that if they’re able to strike that deal with the Washington Post, NYT, WallStreet Journal and magazines, Apple could make a nice chunk of change with that service, but this one makes me nervous. Then again, maybe they have something. Really great in the works I don’t know about.

—————-

Unfortunately too late, Apple will sink in billions and will have no entertainment brand against Amazon, NetFlix, Hulu and Disney. Apple won’t be able to offer TV-MA shows with violence and nudity and racism and drugs, because of its innocent good boy image, and that’s what people pay for. Apple will not be able to package enough original kids/family content because it has no chance against Disney, and that’s what parents want. After some fanfare with big names, in a year, there will be a bunch of cold soup shows that will turn their service into an equivalent of USA or TNT.

And this is all because of the ego of one individual who alone will cause massive harm to Apple - Eddy cue. With his stupid I can do it all attitude, and the immense power given to him, he passed Netflix, Hulu and deals with cable operators. He’s basking in glory of Apple service revenue going up (and surely taking credit for it), but none of the service revenue is because of his genuinity or less, creativity - it’s just because of increased handset base, and better hardware resulting in better apps.

Cue is the Terry Semel of Yahoo, and in time will go as an obstructionist who raked up a pile of money and checked out.

https://www.wired.com/2007/02/yahoo-3/

I’m just hoping the wearable segment can bring in enough money to Apple to offset the cost of this idiot.
 

smetvid

macrumors 6502
Nov 1, 2009
486
277
I would actually like to see them scrap Disney+ and just use Hulu as their platform. I don't really need 500+ different streaming services and if it gets to that point I'm going to hate it as much as cable. Part of leaving cable was to stream but also consolidate that streaming to a handful of platforms. I pay for CBS now because I love Star Trek but I hate having to pay for a single streaming platform for one single show. Ratings are not as good for Star Trek Discovery either for this exact reason and it would have faired much better on Hulu or Netflix. Disney has a lot more potential than the broadcast networks do so I may give them a chance but I would really prefer to just have a handful of services and be done with it.
 

macbeta

macrumors regular
Nov 13, 2009
138
290
—————-

Unfortunately too late, Apple will sink in billions and will have no entertainment brand against Amazon, NetFlix, Hulu and Disney. Apple won’t be able to offer TV-MA shows with violence and nudity and racism and drugs, because of its innocent good boy image, and that’s what people pay for. Apple will not be able to package enough original kids/family content because it has no chance against Disney, and that’s what parents want. After some fanfare with big names, in a year, there will be a bunch of cold soup shows that will turn their service into an equivalent of USA or TNT.

And this is all because of the ego of one individual who alone will cause massive harm to Apple - Eddy cue. With his stupid I can do it all attitude, and the immense power given to him, he passed Netflix, Hulu and deals with cable operators. He’s basking in glory of Apple service revenue going up (and surely taking credit for it), but none of the service revenue is because of his genuinity or less, creativity - it’s just because of increased handset base, and better hardware resulting in better apps.

Cue is the Terry Semel of Yahoo, and in time will go as an obstructionist who raked up a pile of money and checked out.

https://www.wired.com/2007/02/yahoo-3/

I’m just hoping the wearable segment can bring in enough money to Apple to offset the cost of this idiot.

Yes, Apple really missed the boat, thinking they can pivot now and milk more money from its customer base with services is not going to cut it long term. We have already entered the "Death by a thousand subscriptions" era with every app, hardware, phone and internet company, thinking they can charge a subscription, It's getting stupid.
 

UltimaKilo

macrumors 6502a
Nov 14, 2007
647
504
FL
—————-

Unfortunately too late, Apple will sink in billions and will have no entertainment brand against Amazon, NetFlix, Hulu and Disney. Apple won’t be able to offer TV-MA shows with violence and nudity and racism and drugs, because of its innocent good boy image, and that’s what people pay for. Apple will not be able to package enough original kids/family content because it has no chance against Disney, and that’s what parents want. After some fanfare with big names, in a year, there will be a bunch of cold soup shows that will turn their service into an equivalent of USA or TNT.

And this is all because of the ego of one individual who alone will cause massive harm to Apple - Eddy cue. With his stupid I can do it all attitude, and the immense power given to him, he passed Netflix, Hulu and deals with cable operators. He’s basking in glory of Apple service revenue going up (and surely taking credit for it), but none of the service revenue is because of his genuinity or less, creativity - it’s just because of increased handset base, and better hardware resulting in better apps.

Cue is the Terry Semel of Yahoo, and in time will go as an obstructionist who raked up a pile of money and checked out.

https://www.wired.com/2007/02/yahoo-3/

I’m just hoping the wearable segment can bring in enough money to Apple to offset the cost of this idiot.

I disagree completely. I was always against calls from other shareholders (and those from within Apple) that wanted a massive acquisition of Netflix and was very vocal here on the forums. This is probably the best course for Apple, but they have very little room for error as the industry matures (albeit it's still early).

If Apple can produce the content, the consumer will come. Look at CBS All Access and it's growth due to a few programs.

If I was working on this project, I would do everything I could to secure some sort of Sports deal, especially with the MLB contract up for bids in 2020 and I would take a good long look at how much DAZN would cost.

Cue has been hit-or-miss, granted, but he has been handed a billion dollar budget. Let's see what we get.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.