I guess I am lucky. I can simply choose not to subscribe to Disney +(agenda). Great living in the USA.
Disney+ don't have the content to charge such prices...
Disney? Marvel? Star Wars?
If Disney doesn't have enough content... does any streaming service?
🤔
That is old content, not new content.
And?
I thought people liked back-catalog stuff?
That's why people always slam new services because they don't have enough stuff.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Old content that you have already seen is not content. I'm not going to watch the same s-hit i have seen before.
Gotcha.
So what are you into these days?
Which service does provide the greatest value for you?
You read my mind.It's funny.
When the service was first launched, it seemed like a compelling value proposition to have a steady diet of Marvel and Star Wars content.
Now, I am getting bummed out with the service precisely because I am being forced-fed a steady diet of Marvel and Star Wars content, with the caveat precisely that because Disney has to keep churning them out at breakneck speed, the casualty here is the actual quality of content.
Seriously, apart from Mandalorian, none of their original content has resonated with me. They are draggy (often feeling more like a paper-thin plot made to stretch out over 6 episodes), boring, and feels like more Easter eggs and references than actual story.
It's nice getting the Marvel movies (eventually) without having to actually go to a cinema, but then I watch them and it just makes me glad I didn't waste my time going to a cinema. I couldn't bring myself to finish watching Eternals in one sitting; had to break it up over 4 viewing sessions.
I paid for the 1-year plan which is set to expire next Feb. I don't see myself renewing it. May consider letting Netflix go as well, sticking with TV+ and Youtube premium.
May the people sticking with it continue to find value with the service. I honestly don't feel I am. 😕
How wonder how long it will last before they go for a “3 months minimum”The beauty of the current model is you're not stuck in a contract. Just pay monthly to watch something you like, and then stop the subscription until there's another show that you're interested. Rinse and repeat.
I’m having some difficulty finding the annual plans, could you please point me to where you found that?Yes, it's going up to $109.99/year.
Both Disney+ and Netflix are hemorrhaging money, and the latter users, as well. I wonder how the other services are doing. Apple TV+ seems to be doing pretty well, between its now budget price point, shows gaining in popularity, its slow and steady pace of growth (instead of trying to capture millions of users right away and thousands of hours of content), and the Apple One bundle, and the fact that Apple can afford to invest in it for a pretty good length of time as it grows. Other than that, maybe Paramount+ and HBO Max are doing well? Peacock, it’s hard to say. I have to admit that I don’t watch anything on streaming these days, and Apple TV+ is the only one I subscribe to (as part of the Apple One bundle).This is more against making sVoD attractive to people on a budget, versus paying for addition media content for consumers looking for better content from a sVoD service. Both Disney and Netflix are trying to appeal to both types of subscribers.
Reference
![]()
Will Free Ad-Based Streaming Replace Broadcast TV?
Free Ad-Supported TV (FAST) has become the focus of streaming services and studios. More channels are being added to free linear “live TV” services like Pluto, Tubi, Xumo, PLEX, Roku Channel, and others. Established stream-on-demand services like Netflix, Disney+, and Warner Bros. Discovery are...www.soundandvision.com
During the pandemic, the number of streaming users and subscribers peaked as people looked for ways to stay entertained at home. But as the pandemic receded, people looked outside their homes to socialize, and churn was higher than ever when people dropped their subscriptions. Many opted for the classic, nostalgic programming available on the FAST linear live TV channels.
It could worsen as the economy causes users to tighten their belts and drop more subscriptions. Viewers subscribe to an average of five services and may look for ways to reduce their monthly fees. Netflix lost 200,000 subscribers in the first quarter of 2022.
As user numbers drop, streaming companies have announced cutbacks in original programming, with fewer titles in the pipeline for the near future. It’s a catch-22, though. While they need to save money by producing less, they also need the originals to attract and maintain subscribers. The solution lies in bringing in more revenue.
Traditional streaming services like Netflix and Disney + are working out plans to raise more than a billion dollars each by appealing to users who don’t want to pay the rising subscription fees (the Netflix 4K rate is nearing $20 per month). Both companies will offer streaming with commercials. The revenue raised from ad sales will more than make up for the lower subscription fees. Commercial tolerant users view the content for less per month, and streaming services make money from both subscriptions and ads.
It’s not just Netflix and Disney+. The MoffetNathanson research firm projects that ad-supported tiers will also increase profits for Hulu, HBO Max, discovery+ (now Warner Bros. Discovery), and Peacock. In the future, these inexpensive subscription tiers could be the key to the success of streaming services.
As streaming services begin adopting a model that looks more like traditional broadcast TV, how will this affect linear broadcast TV channels? According to research firm Omdia, 2021 may be the last year linear TV is watched more than streaming and other video-on-demand content.
Ahh, thanks for highlighting this. It was a loss leader to … boost their theatrical numbers, which seem to be doing fine?The reason is the streaming services at Disney are a business unit and if you read their financials there is a growing operating loss for Disney’s streaming services. Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+ combined to lose $1.1 billion in the fiscal third quarter. That is $4+ billion in a year in the red. The are bleeding money in the streaming market.
I noticed they just added Orville, there are so many properties I would not have associated with DisneyYou do notice that Disney has started to port some R rated content to their service. The agreement with Comcast related to Hulu expiring by end off 2023, will mean a lot of the adult entertainment will be forth coming and the USA see the equivalent of Star portion of Disney Plus will appear. Recent adds are Deadpool, Deadpool 2 and, Logan. Earlier you had all the netflix Marvel content made available if you enabled the adult access. Disney had a very large portfolio of content they haven't shared.
Welcome, there are ones of us, I swear, ones of us! (Instead of tens, or hundreds, or thousands, to explain and thus ruin the joke.)The only reason I bother with them is it's included in my Verizon plan, I'll be curious if that changes or if Verizon switches me to the ad supported plan. If so I'll just sub them once or twice a year like I do with other streaming services, binge watch the 2 or 3 shows I like and cancel the sub the rest of the year. It's not like they have that much good content, just a few shows worth watching.
The good thing about all this is it has really broken me away from television, it's been an evolution. First with TIVO, that made me only watch exactly what I wanted and took out unscheduled programming and commercials. Then cutting off cable for only Netflix, then I only watched select movies here and there. Now with all the streaming pricing increases I barely even bother with watching television, same with my kids. We read a lot of books now, play games, etc. I just subbed for 1 month to Netflix to catch Stranger Things and Ozark, and reaffirmed my strategy with the amount of pure junk available versus what I would truly enjoy.
Cable and satellite was always this way tooI just can’t get on board with paying and seeing adverts.