Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Do you still buy physical media? (DVD/BR)

  • YES

    Votes: 314 55.0%
  • NO

    Votes: 186 32.6%
  • STREAMING ONLY (Netflix/Prime etc)

    Votes: 71 12.4%

  • Total voters
    571
Haha yes but you gotta agree, those OLED prices have really come down in price - the C8 is £1499 whereas when it launched in May, it was priced at a very 'over inflated' price of £2999. The B8 is currently £1299.

You'd be very impressed with 4K Dolby Vision on OLED :) It's the viewing angles that is the most impressive plus HD looks beautiful on it - thanks to the beautiful upscaler of the Apple TV 4K and OLED.

Your certainly on a different level than me as when did oled's come into blu ray rip criticism from your earlier reply.
Either way enjoy your amazing oled - way beyond my purchase point.
[doublepost=1543932140][/doublepost]
Haha yes but you gotta agree, those OLED prices have really come down in price - the C8 is £1499 whereas when it launched in May, it was priced at a very 'over inflated' price of £2999. The B8 is currently £1299.

You'd be very impressed with 4K Dolby Vision on OLED :) It's the viewing angles that is the most impressive plus HD looks beautiful on it - thanks to the beautiful upscaler of the Apple TV 4K and OLED.

Your certainly on a different level than me as when did oled's come into blu ray rip criticism from your earlier reply.
Either way enjoy your amazing oled - way beyond my purchase point.
 
I also understand the notion of truly "owning" material......and I understand that, to a point, but technically, we don't know what format will be coming down the line years from now. When I was a kid we had a large VHS collection of Disney movies & CD's.....those are all gone now. Blu Rays may be the same 5-10 years down the road. So there's the strong possibility that any physical format may go the way of the VHS / CD.

You are aware that you can still use a CD if you want, right? Even now, 40 years after their introduction, you can STILL buy a CD player and it will sound just fine. Hell, you can buy excellent new record players and current music on vinyl and with a decent setup it will sound amazing. That's a format our grandparents and even great-grandparents would be familiar with.

Also, if you own something in a particular format and a new format comes out, you can usually manage shift your media to the new format. Back 15 years ago we all ripped our CDs to iTunes. I OWN the digital copies I made of those CDs. It's my data, on my hard drives. I don't have to pay a fee to play the files. See how that's different from Spotify? Just to put it in perspective, if I'd been paying $10/month for the last 20 years to listen to my music, I'd be out nearly $2.5K today and access to that music could still disappear next month if I stopped paying.

Video is tougher because the quality jumps have been more dramatic, but even if blu-ray (for example) gets superceded by a better format, that doesn't mean your discs and player just evaporate into thin air. Sure, maybe 20 years down the line it'll be hard to find a blu-ray player -- but if you're looking that far ahead for a streaming service, you're putting a lot of trust in that service still existing down the line too. Think about it, when you "buy" a movie off iTunes, you're assuming that Apple will still be runnng servers down the road to stream it to you, that they still have streaming rights, that they won't replace it with some re-edited version or something... and that's not even touching on the fact that you can't sell or loan out that movie you "bought".
 
Last edited:
You are aware that you can still use a CD if you want, right? Also, if you own something in a particular format and a new format comes out, you can usually manage shift your media to the new format. Back 15, 20 years ago we all ripped our CDs to iTunes. I OWN the digital copies I made of those CDs. It's my data, on my hard drives. I don't have to pay a fee to play the files. See how that's different from Spotify? Just to put it in perspective, if I'd been paying $10/month for the last 20 years to listen to my music, I'd be out nearly $2.5K today and access to that music could still disappear next month if I stopped paying.

Also, if blu-ray (for example) gets superceded by a better format, that doesn't mean your discs and player just evaporate into thin air. Sure, maybe 20 years down the line it'll be hard to find a blu-ray player -- but if you're looking that far ahead for a streaming service, you're putting a lot of trust in that service still existing down the line too.

Beautifully stated. Thank you, sums it pretty accurately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
You are aware that you can still use a CD if you want, right? Even now, 40 years after their introduction, you can STILL buy a CD player and it will sound just fine. Hell, you can buy excellent new record players and current music on vinyl and with a decent setup it will sound amazing. That's a format our grandparents and even great-grandparents would be familiar with.

Also, if you own something in a particular format and a new format comes out, you can usually manage shift your media to the new format. Back 15 years ago we all ripped our CDs to iTunes. I OWN the digital copies I made of those CDs. It's my data, on my hard drives. I don't have to pay a fee to play the files. See how that's different from Spotify? Just to put it in perspective, if I'd been paying $10/month for the last 20 years to listen to my music, I'd be out nearly $2.5K today and access to that music could still disappear next month if I stopped paying.

Video is tougher because the quality jumps have been more dramatic, but even if blu-ray (for example) gets superceded by a better format, that doesn't mean your discs and player just evaporate into thin air. Sure, maybe 20 years down the line it'll be hard to find a blu-ray player -- but if you're looking that far ahead for a streaming service, you're putting a lot of trust in that service still existing down the line too. Think about it, when you "buy" a movie off iTunes, you're assuming that Apple will still be runnng servers down the road to stream it to you, that they still have streaming rights, that they won't replace it with some re-edited version or something... and that's not even touching on the fact that you can't sell or loan out that movie you "bought".

Plus it’s just nice to own things you can hold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
I just bought Red Dead Redemption II on disc because 1) it was exactly the same price 2) Amazon delivered it practially overnight and most importantly 3) when I'm done with it I can sell it or loan it out as I see fit because, unlike the "digital copy" that's locked away inside my Playstation's hard drive, I control it.

That's an important part of true ownership of something, being able to decide for yourself whether you want to transfer it to someone else. If you can't do that, do you really own it? If I bought a car and paid for it but with the stipulation that its title was forever tied to my driver's license, would it be worth as much as a car that I can freely sell or give away? I don't think so. And yet so many people just accept those terms with digital purchases because... the companies said so?

(Note I'm talking about purchases here, not rentals or subscriptions. I'm under no illusion that I own an iTunes rental or anything I stream from Netflix and that's fine).
Right here, my friend, you hit the nail on the head. I'm an old guy and I guess I have old fashioned ideas about what the concept of owning means: it includes such things as the right to sell, give, or bequeath something I have bought and paid for to whomever I want. Anything less than this, say be giving me the privilege of streaming a movie from a remote source whenever I want, fails to meet my expectation of true ownership.

The studios and networks, with the cheerful complicity of corporations such as Apple and Amazon, have been busily eroding and chipping away at traditional notions of buying and owning and by a kind of slight-of-hand have are fobbing us off with a specialized form of leasing in its place, with the result that that unwary customers are under the illusion they have bought something when they actually have not. To my admittedly old-fashioned way of thinking, this bait-and-switch amounts to an act of aggression against consumers.

So if I pay twenty bucks to buy a movie I want to make sure I'm actually buying the thing. For my twenty bucks I want either a movie delivered on some physical object I can hold in my hand or in electronic form that I can download and keep locally on my own storage device, back up, and otherwise treat as my own personal, purchased property in every way that the law has traditionally defined the concept of ownership.

In the same vein, in every other way I find cloud services hugely convenient. But it troubles me that cloud accounts are non-transferable (or at least I've never heard of one that is). That's why I keep a copy of any music I've purchased stored locally and only use remote streaming for the benefit of my mobile devices. Hell, external storage devices I can hook up to my Mac have gotten so ridiculously cheap that I don't have an excuse not to do that. I would never think of using iCloud, Dropbox, or any similar service as the sole and only repository for any of my stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
In the same vein, in every other way I find cloud services hugely convenient. But it troubles me that cloud accounts are non-transferable (or at least I've never heard of one that is). That's why I keep a copy of any music I've purchased stored locally and only use remote streaming for the benefit of my mobile devices. Hell, external storage devices I can hook up to my Mac have gotten so ridiculously cheap that I don't have an excuse not to do that. I would never think of using iCloud, Dropbox, or any similar service as the sole and only repository for any of my stuff.

Definitely. I use iCloud Drive and Dropbox, but I also make sure that the full contents of each are set to download to my Mac and that all that is backed up. I just don't trust any company to hold the only copy of my data...
 
Plus it’s just nice to own things you can hold.

Definitely for books and no digital things like clothes, art and surf boards but for me, music and film is just beautiful in my iTunes - all in one place and ready to travel with me. I've moved house so many times since graduating that i've lost a lot of CDs or misplaced them or lent them to people on my life's journey never to get them back :)

I was never that keen on holding CDs with their plastic cases that scratched so easy and looked awful after a few months on the shelf plus i'm not a fan on them being on display anyway but then i'm not a collector compared to collecting books or surfboards.
[doublepost=1543948632][/doublepost]
You are aware that you can still use a CD if you want, right? Even now, 40 years after their introduction, you can STILL buy a CD player and it will sound just fine. Hell, you can buy excellent new record players and current music on vinyl and with a decent setup it will sound amazing. That's a format our grandparents and even great-grandparents would be familiar with.

Also, if you own something in a particular format and a new format comes out, you can usually manage shift your media to the new format. Back 15 years ago we all ripped our CDs to iTunes. I OWN the digital copies I made of those CDs. It's my data, on my hard drives. I don't have to pay a fee to play the files. See how that's different from Spotify? Just to put it in perspective, if I'd been paying $10/month for the last 20 years to listen to my music, I'd be out nearly $2.5K today and access to that music could still disappear next month if I stopped paying.

Video is tougher because the quality jumps have been more dramatic, but even if blu-ray (for example) gets superceded by a better format, that doesn't mean your discs and player just evaporate into thin air. Sure, maybe 20 years down the line it'll be hard to find a blu-ray player -- but if you're looking that far ahead for a streaming service, you're putting a lot of trust in that service still existing down the line too. Think about it, when you "buy" a movie off iTunes, you're assuming that Apple will still be runnng servers down the road to stream it to you, that they still have streaming rights, that they won't replace it with some re-edited version or something... and that's not even touching on the fact that you can't sell or loan out that movie you "bought".
I disagree with your argument - if you'd been playing 10 a month for the last 20 years, you might have discovered 20 million different songs that you maybe would not of had the pleasure of hearing otherwise and you might have bought them.

It's very clear that a lot of people are rather conservative on this site and are not living for now. Buying BluRay in old 1080p will become very obsolete in a few years time. Look how poorly built the majority of these players are today. Do you really want a cheap tacky thing? 4K BluRay players will be dead in a few years time and then how will people play these dinosaurs?
I certainly would not worry about Apple's servers. Apple seems to be the most ethical of all of the tech companies out there - if your BD player is a Samsung, SONY or LG, it's very clear that those companies churn out 'stuff' for one reason only - profit and nothing else.
IMO Apple is the absolute safest bet out there. However, each to their own. As long as you enjoy your way of listening to music, then good on you. But the world of today is simply fantastic with streaming - 4K HDR, Dolby Vision, Signing in to your account anywhere in the world, faster internet speeds all of the time, 5G - it's a very very exciting time for digital but the old disc is rather 1999!
 
Just a comment on the structure of the survey: This should have been a simple Yes/No question. "No" and "Streaming Only" are, though not identical, roughly equivalent. If you want to know whether the "No" votes are due to purchasing downloads vs. subscription model, it's probably better to ask that question separately - some will undoubtedly answer "both purchased downloads and subscriptions," while others will be "purchased only," "download only," and some will be "Don't purchase media at all." Only a simple "No" encompasses all the possibilities.
 
Right here, my friend, you hit the nail on the head. I'm an old guy and I guess I have old fashioned ideas about what the concept of owning means:
I have had numerous discussions with my way younger colleagues over this and similar topics (down to owning a flat or house). The shift of paradigm is happening elsewhere : my younger mates tell me, that they do not want to own anything. Just having access to something is good enough. And not owning anything does not anchor you down to someplace. You are free like a bird. :)
So, yeah...
 
I'm somewhere between "No" and "Streaming only." I buy movies on iTunes frequently but I stream Netflix/Prime more often than anything.
 
last month went through eleven boxes of house hold DVD's and totally recycled them. Ripped out all the clear plastic, separated out the paper and tossed the cd itself in the garbage.
the local vintage shop was not taking them and GoodWill said they would toss them out.
 
You are aware that you can still use a CD if you want, right? Even now, 40 years after their introduction, you can STILL buy a CD player and it will sound just fine. Hell, you can buy excellent new record players and current music on vinyl and with a decent setup it will sound amazing. That's a format our grandparents and even great-grandparents would be familiar with.

Also, if you own something in a particular format and a new format comes out, you can usually manage shift your media to the new format. Back 15 years ago we all ripped our CDs to iTunes. I OWN the digital copies I made of those CDs. It's my data, on my hard drives. I don't have to pay a fee to play the files. See how that's different from Spotify? Just to put it in perspective, if I'd been paying $10/month for the last 20 years to listen to my music, I'd be out nearly $2.5K today and access to that music could still disappear next month if I stopped paying.

Video is tougher because the quality jumps have been more dramatic, but even if blu-ray (for example) gets superceded by a better format, that doesn't mean your discs and player just evaporate into thin air. Sure, maybe 20 years down the line it'll be hard to find a blu-ray player -- but if you're looking that far ahead for a streaming service, you're putting a lot of trust in that service still existing down the line too. Think about it, when you "buy" a movie off iTunes, you're assuming that Apple will still be runnng servers down the road to stream it to you, that they still have streaming rights, that they won't replace it with some re-edited version or something... and that's not even touching on the fact that you can't sell or loan out that movie you "bought".

You make some good points.....I guess my bigger point is for the most part, most things that people "own" now....will be replaced in the future. Yes, there are exceptions.....and theoretically the items don't vanish & one could still continue to play whatever media they currently have (i.e. VCR & VHS), but from a realistic standpoint, how many people here will honestly admit to still owning & WATCHING their VHS copies of movies regulary?

Cars, TV's, clothes, appliances, furniture, shoes, computers, etc. all (from a consumer & business standpoint) have a "shelf life"......Most people replace these particular items & more. In fact, many times the items don't cease to stop working.....but they are still replaced by newer updated products. How many people are wearing the exact same clothes they did 15 years ago, or using the same computer, or watching the same TV? How many people truly use items until the item is destroyed? There are plenty of traded in used cars, plenty of shoes that still function of shoes, plenty of HD TV's & PC's & landline phones that could were still operating when they were replaced.

There's this perception that those who have physical media will keep & use these items indefinitely & that digital media users are getting the sort end of the stick because a service could stop at any moment. While that's true.....someone could lose their physical media as well....to theft, damage, natural disaster, etc. Nothing is guaranteed to last.

There are a host of "What If's" and while one "could" continue to use a physical media format, doesn't necessarily mean they, realistically, will 10, 15, 20 years down the road.

Cost wise, it just depend on the individual. The $10 a month scenario you mentioned for streaming for the last 20 years could also be applied to the cost of a CD. In it's hey day, most CDs cost more than $10 (especially depending on where you purchased them) Virgin Megastore, Tower Records, Sam Goody would regulary charge $15 to $20 per singular album....If one purchased one CD a month for the last 20 years, the cost would exceed the 2.5K. previously mentioned.

Bottom line is there are pros & cons to both. There is no right or wrong answer. For many, they prefer digital media for a variety of reasons, the same reason people may prefer physical.

I'm not basing my digital media use on what will happen in the future. It's what I'm using now.....If it all stops & something new comes along, either I will adapt or I won't.

It still doesn't stop me form enjoying the digital media I have now.
[doublepost=1543964612][/doublepost]
I have had numerous discussions with my way younger colleagues over this and similar topics (down to owning a flat or house). The shift of paradigm is happening elsewhere : my younger mates tell me, that they do not want to own anything. Just having access to something is good enough. And not owning anything does not anchor you down to someplace. You are free like a bird. :)
So, yeah...

I agree, I think there is a shift.....while some may not agree or understand, it doesn't necessarily mean that it's "wrong" or that person is somehow shortsighted.

Over the last couple of years, there's been a shift where many people are more interested in "experiences" rather than owning things. There have been so many surveys where people where asked to choose between vacations or a new entertainment set up & vacations overwhelming win. For many, ownership isn't a goal anymore......in fact they prefer NOT to be tied into something.

People value different things, doesn't make one right or wrong, but for many, as long as they have access to something, it fits into their lifestyle.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ApfelKuchen
Did you actually throw them in the garbage? Here in the U.S. I would have sold them to some place such as Half Price Books (they purchase books, CDs, DVDs, phonograph records, etc.). I didn't get much money when I sold them my phonograph records (and turntable) a couple of years ago, but it's better than putting the items into a landfill!

Ya, i did, and if there were places round here, I would have done that.

You are aware that you can still use a CD if you want, right? Even now, 40 years after their introduction, you can STILL buy a CD player and it will sound just fine. Hell, you can buy excellent new record players and current music on vinyl and with a decent setup it will sound amazing. That's a format our grandparents and even great-grandparents would be familiar with.

My parents play music via USB but we also do physical copy as well for listening indoors on the old 2013 Kenwood.

Personally, i would choose different music, but that's another story.. She has pre-amp, four small speakers, and CD player,,, and she listens to classical lol..

Cant get more original than that.
 
Right here, my friend, you hit the nail on the head. I'm an old guy and I guess I have old fashioned ideas about what the concept of owning means: it includes such things as the right to sell, give, or bequeath something I have bought and paid for to whomever I want. Anything less than this, say be giving me the privilege of streaming a movie from a remote source whenever I want, fails to meet my expectation of true ownership.

The studios and networks, with the cheerful complicity of corporations such as Apple and Amazon, have been busily eroding and chipping away at traditional notions of buying and owning and by a kind of slight-of-hand have are fobbing us off with a specialized form of leasing in its place, with the result that that unwary customers are under the illusion they have bought something when they actually have not. To my admittedly old-fashioned way of thinking, this bait-and-switch amounts to an act of aggression against consumers.

So if I pay twenty bucks to buy a movie I want to make sure I'm actually buying the thing. For my twenty bucks I want either a movie delivered on some physical object I can hold in my hand or in electronic form that I can download and keep locally on my own storage device, back up, and otherwise treat as my own personal, purchased property in every way that the law has traditionally defined the concept of ownership.

In the same vein, in every other way I find cloud services hugely convenient. But it troubles me that cloud accounts are non-transferable (or at least I've never heard of one that is). That's why I keep a copy of any music I've purchased stored locally and only use remote streaming for the benefit of my mobile devices. Hell, external storage devices I can hook up to my Mac have gotten so ridiculously cheap that I don't have an excuse not to do that. I would never think of using iCloud, Dropbox, or any similar service as the sole and only repository for any of my stuff.

The thing about “owning” physical media is that you own the paper and plastic. The contents belongs to the copyright owner. As long as you take good care of the physical object, you can keep accessing the contents. You do not have the right to a replacement if damaged or lost - you must buy another. You do not have the right to make a copy to keep when you can sell the physical object.

It doesn’t matter whether you buy a stack of paper or a piece of plastic, pay for a license for a download, or pay a monthly subscription. Somebody else owns the music/movie/novel/information. All you’re doing is renting. The only difference is the terms of the rental agreement. Pick the terms that work for you.

Me? I don’t have the albums of my youth. I don’t even have the negatives of the photos I took as a budding photographer. Most of the paperbacks I bought and managed to hold onto are falling apart. Stuff happens to physical stuff. But for a monthly fee, I now have access to all the music I could never afford to buy as a kid; nearly every composition of the chamber music repertory I learned to love in my 20s... I worked at radio stations with 20,000 and 50,000 album libraries, respectively. My personal collection could never hold a candle to those.

It’s been many decades since I gave up on the notion of “owning” a library containing all the media I’ve loved. Maybe it’s because I grew up across the street from a decent public library, listening to the radio, and watching broadcast TV. Borrowing seems fine to me, and $10 for a month’s worth of music seems a better value than $10 for sitting in a movie theater for two hours. And if I needed to rent an extra bedroom or two to hold my library... just how much would that cost on a monthly basis?

Live entertainment, a witty conversation, a beautiful sunset, vacation travel, a great meal or superb bottle of wine... it’s about the experience. It’s about the emotional impact, sensory and intellectual stimulation, warm memories. Of those experiences that you pay for, you accept that you paid for something ephemeral.

If we can accept the evanescence of those experiences, what’s different about the written word or recorded sound and pictures? It’s not like they’re one-of-a-kind paintings that might appreciate in value. They’re not investments, they’re mass-produced copies that nearly always lose value. If I can put my hands on another copy when I have the urge to experience it again, why worry about ownership?
 
The thing about “owning” physical media is that you own the paper and plastic. The contents belongs to the copyright owner. As long as you take good care of the physical object, you can keep accessing the contents. You do not have the right to a replacement if damaged or lost - you must buy another. You do not have the right to make a copy to keep when you can sell the physical object.

True, but it's just more convenient to on "plastic" :)

For one, you can give it to someone to see, or borrow... It's nuts to think you have to legally purchase, just to use {one} time only..

This is were 'renting' content comes in... as its cheaper, so more will likely do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee50
True, but it's just more convenient to on "plastic" :)

For one, you can give it to someone to see, or borrow... It's nuts to think you have to legally purchase, just to use {one} time only..

This is were 'renting' content comes in... as its cheaper, so more will likely do it.

That's true on one of the perks of physical media, you could give it someone to borrow or see......but technically, people do that with digital media as well. It may not come in a fancy package, but there are plenty of people who put movies / music / media on flash drives & give to others. Another poster that he simply signs into his account on his friends apple tv & shares his content that way. So TECHNICALLY (pun intended) you can give & share digital media as well.

People share digital photos this way.....(that's another digital vs physical element that hasn't been discussed). While people still widely use & receive physical photos (generally for special occasions), most photo sharing is done digitally.....

The fact that those photos "could disappear" at "any moment" doesn't deter people from taking photos & storing them in their digital libraries (as opposed to physically printing up every photo & placing them in a photo album)

There's room for both physical & digital media.........most people uses what works out for them :)
 
That's true on one of the perks of physical media, you could give it someone to borrow or see......but technically, people do that with digital media as well. It may not come in a fancy package, but there are plenty of people who put movies / music / media on flash drives & give to others. Another poster that he simply signs into his account on his friends apple tv & shares his content that way. So TECHNICALLY (pun intended) you can give & share digital media as well.
With iTunes you have to deal with FairPlay DRM encryption. Not an issue for SD content, but a substantial problem for HD content. I'll keep buying discs so long as they are available.
[doublepost=1544058795][/doublepost]
Buying BluRay in old 1080p will become very obsolete in a few years time. Look how poorly built the majority of these players are today. Do you really want a cheap tacky thing? 4K BluRay players will be dead in a few years time and then how will people play these dinosaurs?
This is really an irrelevant and misguided statement. Whatever replaces 4k BD will still be backwards compatible. My BD player plays BD, DVD, CDs, Photo CDs, and discs/drives that have MPEG2, MPEG4, AVI and MKV files perfectly fine. Meanwhile, I'll continue to rip my 4K BD, BD, 3D BD, DVD, CDs, etc. for use with Plex and avoid all that DRM crap.
 
Last edited:
I'm loving this thread because I think about this often and my husband and I discuss it and tend to think the same way. I am 27 years old. I use Apple Music for my music as I feel for myself music is a different thing. I love paying $15 a month for the whole family to listen to anything they want in a legal manner. Albums that I LOVE I will buy physically on CD.

I love the tangible aspect of physical media.

When it comes to film and television I am obsessed with buying Blu-ray or DVD if that is the only format available. However, my rule is 4K if possible then trickle down to Blu-ray and DVD. I have a hard time accepting the digital world of iTunes and other digital storefronts for films and television. I see these things as more of an experience. I have a Sony A1E OLED and a full sound system to have the full experience as the director and actors intended. I struggle with this because studios for as long as blu-ray has been in existence they still persist to release some things solely on DVD. Which causes a great loss in quality especially on a bigger television screen. Some titles that are physically DVD only are available HD via Apple TV purchases. However, I still will not buy on Apple and have even chosen to physically own the DVD version.

I may need a tinfoil hat but I don't like feeling as if I don't actually own something. Rather I am leasing it with the possibility of it being lost. OR if at some point in the future our internet plans get even more expensive with they way the world IS moving towards the streaming of everything. I enjoy paying once and being able to watch a film numerous times without using any kind of data cap.

I also have a collectors need of displaying my wares. I have display cases full of my blu-ray collection so friends and visitors can look and choose what they want to watch instead of it just appearing on the television screen.

In terms of video games for consoles I have always only bought physical media as again it doesn't run the risk of having a hard drive or other type of storage to be full and cause me to have to upgrade etc. I own the actual item and if I want to lend or sell I have that option.

Additionally I still will not buy any type of e-book. I love the smell of books. The ability to see how far I am in the book. Displaying all my books on my shelves. Loaning a favourite one to a friend and reminiscing and rereading. Books getting old. Pages wrinkling. Showing their history.

I am a tech geek. I love keeping up with the newest formats and increases in quality. But part of me is definitely old-fashioned at heart.

So for me at 27 years old. I love to collect all forms of physical media and being able to hold what I am spending my money on. I know this is the minority of my generation and the next generation but I hope that physical media continues and we don't see a day when there is no such thing as a tangible item for our money.
 
Last edited:
I used to collect DVDs and CDs. Before that VHS tapes, vinyl albums and paper books. Now movies are strictly streamed or downloaded. Music download. Books on Kindle.

Not having a physical copy doesn’t bother me in the slightest. If anything it’s more secure in that my movies etc. are almost free of the risk of damage or theft. I can easily take my entire collections with me when I travel or go on holiday. I love that Apple have automatically upgraded (for free) some of my movies from HD to 4K/HDR. As Internet speeds get better, the quality of streamed movies will only get better. I also like it that I don’t have collections that will one day end up in landfill.

It’s all about perspective, but for me the advantages of not having physical media makes it an easy choice.
 
Now and then.

Why not? physical media is permanent, usually the highest quality, and stuff I want to keep forever, ya. Streaming services are not going to send you uncompressed Dolby HD.
 
I still (occasionally) buy CD's and I subscribe to Netflix's DVD/Blu Ray mail plan.

Streaming and downloading has not yet caught up to physical media in quality. CD's are still better than Apple Music or Spotify. Tidal HiFi is the same on paper but in reality I don't think it quite matches CD's.

And Blu Rays still trounce streaming in quality. Especially audio quality. I have a receiver and two floor standing speakers and the hissing, scratchy audio you still often get with streaming can be like nails against the blackboard.

But I just watched the first 4 episodes of the Twin Peaks reboot on Blu Ray. These discs use all available storage so the video runs at about 37 mbps and the audio is about 2 mbps. The picture and sound are AMAZING. Even 4K streaming doesn't really come that close.
 
Last edited:
Physical media all the way. I don´t want to rely on my rather mediocre internet connection which may lead to hiccups during streaming. And I am a fan of formats that I only get on disc: for music multichannel recordings on SACD or Blu-ray Audio; for film 3D movies, which I only get on blu-ray. Also as soundtrack collector I buy special edition CDs from boutique labels like Lalaland Records. Streaming has not much worthwhile to offer to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seanrt
I had shifted to digital only and am heavily invested in the Apple and Apple TV ecosystem but have recently been burnt by iTunes on two films that I purchased on the appleTV this year and lost the ability to redownload them due to publisher changes.

This has prompted me to purchase Tuneskit to backup my purchases and im going return to disc based purchases.

If Apple keep this up an AppleTV without a Hdd is useless, why pay for a movie on a Apple TV which could be gone tomorrow.

As a stand alone product the Apple TV is a pile of poo because a digital purchase with Apple is not a purchase for life it's a purchase that can change with the wind. As they say on Dragon's Den for that reason im OUT.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.