A hidden cost of an Apple ecosystem that connects devices: disconnected customers
Restore expected functionality Pages? I don't know. More than that, and this is not too off-topic …
Restore what has been removed from Safari? I don't know. And so on.
… I think it's worse than omissive. It's becoming exclusive to the detriment of some customers, and I doubt that it's easy to categorise those customers.
Let's take a dictionary definition of ecosystem:
It has become, unfortunately, little more than a parroted buzzword (recent Apple PR example). Five years ago it was used more thoughtfully, for example –
– and nothing produced by the old Apple gave me cause to doubt the sincerity of that statement.
Apple's so-called 'ecosystem' is now somewhat deplorable. On the surface, to shareholders and others with a financial interest, it may impress, e.g. "driving our highest EPS growth rate in seven quarters” – and I do welcome the potential for greater interconnectivity between devices – but beneath the surface there's a hidden cost. Inappropriate reductions to usability and/or functionality of software cause a disconnect between the company and the human; the humans who feel excluded as a result of the degraded software.
There's emotion and cliché in that paragraph but please, don't dismiss it for those reasons.
Every time someone gushes about numbers, about market share, about profitability or whatever – in response to a complaint about degradation of software – there's another silent but sure swing of the sledgehammer at a pillar of something that Tim Cook reportedly holds dear:
Do You Think Pages Will Ever Return to Past Functionality? … Do you think Pages will ever have the functionality it once had? …
Bottom line, I miss having a supported version of Pages, do you think Apple will ever restore it's functionality.![]()
Restore expected functionality Pages? I don't know. More than that, and this is not too off-topic …
Restore what has been removed from Safari? I don't know. And so on.
… Apple is trying to build an entire world within their ecosystem. … It's a nice strategy, but it leaves professional and prosumer users out.
… I think it's worse than omissive. It's becoming exclusive to the detriment of some customers, and I doubt that it's easy to categorise those customers.
Let's take a dictionary definition of ecosystem:
• (in general use) a complex network or interconnected system: Silicon Valley's entrepreneurial ecosystem | the entire ecosystem of movie and video production will eventually go digital.
It has become, unfortunately, little more than a parroted buzzword (recent Apple PR example). Five years ago it was used more thoughtfully, for example –
Apple (United Kingdom) - Education - Leaders & Administrators - The Apple Ecosystem
Everything Apple means everything just works.
Apple is the only company that has created a complete ecosystem for learning. This includes the hardware — Mac, iPod and iPhone — the software and the Mac OS X operating system. All the components are designed by one company, and they’re all designed to work together seamlessly. That makes Apple technology easier to implement, easier to use, easier to maintain and ultimately a better technology investment.
Everything Apple means everything just works.
Apple is the only company that has created a complete ecosystem for learning. This includes the hardware — Mac, iPod and iPhone — the software and the Mac OS X operating system. All the components are designed by one company, and they’re all designed to work together seamlessly. That makes Apple technology easier to implement, easier to use, easier to maintain and ultimately a better technology investment.
– and nothing produced by the old Apple gave me cause to doubt the sincerity of that statement.
Apple's so-called 'ecosystem' is now somewhat deplorable. On the surface, to shareholders and others with a financial interest, it may impress, e.g. "driving our highest EPS growth rate in seven quarters” – and I do welcome the potential for greater interconnectivity between devices – but beneath the surface there's a hidden cost. Inappropriate reductions to usability and/or functionality of software cause a disconnect between the company and the human; the humans who feel excluded as a result of the degraded software.
There's emotion and cliché in that paragraph but please, don't dismiss it for those reasons.
Every time someone gushes about numbers, about market share, about profitability or whatever – in response to a complaint about degradation of software – there's another silent but sure swing of the sledgehammer at a pillar of something that Tim Cook reportedly holds dear:
Apple's wish to produce the best, not the most.