Didn't ipod touches have the Wireless N module? They just weren't activated.
why? it doesn't matter for internet...
n is only better for intra-network transfers, not for getting wifi on the phone
why? it doesn't matter for internet...
n is only better for intra-network transfers, not for getting wifi on the phone
n has better range
so far n at least how apple does it has worse range. I bet it takes a fair amount more power too.n has better range.. I have no idea if it has a positive or negative effect on power though.
n has better range.. I have no idea if it has a positive or negative effect on power though.
802.11n radios still consume too much power for the iPhone. Hell, even 802.11g consumes too much. I bet it'll still be 802.11g. Why? Apple hasn't even unrestricted full xxx.11g access. Wi-Fi on the iPhone is capped at 12 Mb/s, where as 802.11g can push up to 54 Mb/s.
Have to correct you a bit here.
G network connect at 54 MBit not 54 Mb/s and 54Mbit is a bit over 5Mb/s but as G network is build to only use half speed for up and for down then you get at max speed around 2.4-2.5 Mb/s
that is one of the things that N changes on. but i am guessing you mean it only pull around 12 MBit (Aka B speeds more or less)
And yes the max speed on 54 Mbit is 6.75 MB/s but with the overlap you are around 4.8 - 5.4 MB/s if you could get the full 54 Mbit in dl (You can with 108 Mbit mimo routers)
i dont think it will since mobile devices will never need the throughput of 300mbps.. 54mbps is sufficient for now. But for range coverage it would be nice. But then that means a heavier duty on the battery.
For the bluetooth, I hope they add file transfer!!![]()