Mine is not job related either. Your experience is a very unpopular opinion/experience. I have not used 8.6 in almost a decade, but I didn't have many problems with it that I remember. I am not a huge fan of classic Mac OS in the first place, though (Sorry macos9lives' guys). It has its uses here and there though. But Mac OS X 10.3 through 10.6 were near perfect IMO, and 10.7 - 10.9 were not bad either. Most people hate 10.7, It's one of those things that why use it when 10.8 exists, but it is fairly stable.Wow, OK. I'm not doubting you at all. But that is contrary to my own experience. Granted, my usage of Mac OS is not totally job related. It's been very smooth sailing for me with my old '12 iMac. Much better than my experience with 8.6 on my 6500 or Leopard on my G4.
Define "much better performance"? Obviously my 8-Core mac pro on mojave has way better performance than any PPC I have, its a million times faster and is a totally different machine. I'm talking from an operating system quality/stability standpoint. Now the 2008 Mac Pro is a brilliant machine, and paired with a good stable OS it would be unstoppable (like snow leopard or Windows 7), much like the sawtooth in its era. I use my sawtooth almost everyday, btw.
In my opinion, and from what others have said just in this thread alone, and lurking on other threads, new Mac OS' quality is laughable. I'm not saying its unusable, and as my OP says I still prefer it over Windows 10. I also stated that I prefer Windows 7 over "macOS" now (say 10.10 - 10.14). Though I have little experience with 10.10 or 10.11, I'm told 10.11 was the last good one, I just haven't used it a lot personally, and I've never used yosemite. Personally on the outside I find all post yosemite versions to be horribly ugly. This flat, kindergartner-looking UI trend is dreadful. But that is a conversation for a different thread lol