Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

chrix

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jan 5, 2009
11
0
I'm just curious, does the 10.5.7 release solved the issue that uMBP 470 can't support 8G RAM?
 
I'm just curious, does the 10.5.7 release solved the issue that uMBP 470 can't support 8G RAM?

What's uMBP 470? Is that the older one? If so, it's a hardware issue, so I don't see how a software update can fix that.
 
sorry for the confusing, but MB470 and MB471 and even 17 inch MBPs are using the same chipset, so I guess it was just SW/Firmware limitation
 
what i think happened is instead of creating different boards for the high end 15" and 17" they just the same one for both. but the 2.4Ghz is still the old chipset hence half the 3MB instead of 6MB. this is probably why it doesnt support the 8GB of RAM.

It has nothing to do with the amount of L2 Cache in the processor. All Intel C2D P8X00 series processors can use up to 8GB of RAM provided the chipset allows it. Not sure what Apple has done to block that, but if you were to pair the P8600 with a PM45 chipset, it would support 8GB (maybe even 16GB) of DDR2/DDR3.
 
Be honest with your self. Do you really NEED a whole 8 gigs of RAM? Sure it would be nice, but I doubt you would regularly max it out. I'm just waiting for the prices to come down so that I can get 6 gigs.
 
It has nothing to do with the amount of L2 Cache in the processor. All Intel C2D P8X00 series processors can use up to 8GB of RAM provided the chipset allows it. Not sure what Apple has done to block that, but if you were to pair the P8600 with a PM45 chipset, it would support 8GB (maybe even 16GB) of DDR2/DDR3.

i know that the cache size has nothing to do with the amount of RAM. i was using that spec to compare the two different logic boards.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.