Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

speekez

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Nov 19, 2003
350
2
Question about Itunes album art --

Is there a difference between the way Itunes automatically adds album art from the itunes store VERSES me adding album art to songs?

Do both ways embed the art into the aac/mp3 files (thereby adding to the size of the music file)? Or, is art that is added via the music store not embedded but added another way?

Itunes was able to find art for about 50% of my music, and I am adding the rest. When I am done, I want to create a backup of all my songs and just want to make sure the art is backed up with it.

thanks!
 

balamw

Moderator emeritus
Aug 16, 2005
19,366
979
New England
Do both ways embed the art into the aac/mp3 files (thereby adding to the size of the music file)? Or, is art that is added via the music store not embedded but added another way?
As you suspect, automatic iTS artwork goes into a database and not into your files. Embedded art is copied into separate part of the same database.

You can embed the downloaded artwork simply by selecting an album copy the artwork and paste it back onto the album.

B
 

speekez

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Nov 19, 2003
350
2
As you suspect, automatic iTS artwork goes into a database and not into your files. Embedded art is copied into separate part of the same database.

You can embed the downloaded artwork simply by selecting an album copy the artwork and paste it back onto the album.

B


thank you, quick follow-up

1. you say "embedded art is copied into a separate part of the same database". are you saying this artwork is added to both the file and the database?

2. do both types of art (from itunes store and what I add) increase music file size?

3. is there any benefit to embedding the artwork?

4. is there anyway to tell which art was downloaded from the Itunes store?

thanks!
 

balamw

Moderator emeritus
Aug 16, 2005
19,366
979
New England
thank you, quick follow-up

1. you say "embedded art is copied into a separate part of the same database". are you saying this artwork is added to both the file and the database?

2. do both types of art (from itunes store and what I add) increase music file size?

3. is there any benefit to embedding the artwork?

4. is there anyway to tell which art was downloaded from the Itunes store?

thanks!
1. Yes, the artwork from the files is copied to the database and takes up space in both, although if all the files in an album have the same artwork, only one copy is put in the db.

2. No, only embedded/local artwork adds to the file size

3. Portability, the artwork goes with the file

4. I haven't found an easy way myself.

FWIW the databases are in ~/My Music/iTunes/Album Artwork on my PC here.

One is "Local" for the embedded artwork, the other is "Download"

B
 

ntrigue

macrumors 68040
Jul 30, 2007
3,805
4
I ran across a script that embeds album artwork in the music file

Sorry to revive an old thread. I came across yet another brilliant Doug's AppleScript called Embed Artwork and was interested in a few things.

-I've put many hours into correcting ID tags and downloading the artwork for my music. Isn't the logical step to embed my efforts.

-How many kb impact would this embedding have? Is it compressed or exactly equal to the .jpg size?

-Can I still remove the artwork at another time after it is embedded?

-HD's are quite capable but would this not provide the smallest speed increase as the HD wouldn't have to read to two file locations?

Thanks for the brainstorming!
 

ab2650

macrumors 6502a
Jun 21, 2007
714
0
Sorry to revive an old thread. I came across yet another brilliant Doug's AppleScript called Embed Artwork and was interested in a few things.

1. I've put many hours into correcting ID tags and downloading the artwork for my music. Isn't the logical step to embed my efforts.

2. How many kb impact would this embedding have? Is it compressed or exactly equal to the .jpg size?

3. Can I still remove the artwork at another time after it is embedded?

4. HD's are quite capable but would this not provide the smallest speed increase as the HD wouldn't have to read to two file locations?

Thanks for the brainstorming!

(I've numbered your Q's so I can respond numerically).

1. I've spend hours tagging too. Adding album artwork has always been a pain, but IMHO, so worth it (especially if you have an iPod).

2. Technically speaking, you're embedding a jpeg file into the mp3 file. The change in file size is comparative to the original image, less the file headers (small anyway). It probably doesn't make sense to embed 2 MB scans of albums, but rather 10k or so images.

3. Yes. There are programs which will strip the artwork and 'unpad' the header to reduce file size. The Godfather is one on Windows that comes to mind.

4. I don't think you'll notice any difference in speed, unless you're storing the database on some godawfully slow drive.
 

ntrigue

macrumors 68040
Jul 30, 2007
3,805
4
3. Yes. There are programs which will strip the artwork and 'unpad' the header to reduce file size. The Godfather is one on Windows that comes to mind.

Could you elaborate on the header? Thanks
 

ab2650

macrumors 6502a
Jun 21, 2007
714
0
Could you elaborate on the header? Thanks

Think of a mp3 file as containing two parts. Data and header. The data is quite simply the stream of bits that comprise the information for the audio. The header will contain sets of information such as the ID3 tag, and specifically on subject, an embedded image. When I say that it "expands" or "unpads" the header, it's because the header section is not a preset size; it can grow and shrink to fit the data you need to store there. So for instance:

File A: [-------- Data ---------|-Header-]
File B: [-------- Data ---------|------Header------]

my ASCII graphic represents the same mp3 data with different sized headers, File B being able to store a larger graphic. Of course this makes the overall size of File B a bit larger. Realistically, the header is significantly small compared to the data.

Certain programs will let you remove the image from the ID3 tag in the header, but they don't always 'shrink' the header space; they just "zero-fill" where the image went. So you have no image, and the same size file. Good taggers will let you minimize the space that isn't being used anymore by an image, saving you a bit of space.

This is a long explanation of something that usually saves at best 1% of space in an MP3 file; Like I said before, embedded graphics for album artwork are usually very small anyway.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.