Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
From http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/specs.html

Supported resolutions: 1440 by 900 (native), 1280 by 800, 1152 by 720, 1024 by 640, and 800 by 500 at 16:10 aspect ratio; 1024 by 768, 800 by 600, and 640 by 480 at 4:3 aspect ratio; 1024 by 768, 800 by 600, and 640 by 480 at 4:3 aspect ratio stretched; 720 by 480 at 3:2 aspect ratio; 720 by 480 at 3:2 aspect ratio stretched
 
is that a yes, or no?😕

It all depends on what you mean by high-def. In my opinion, it is a silly marketing term that is fairly useless in computers. The MacBook Pro 15" uses a 1440*900 resolution screen which is better than 720P on a TV, but worse than a 1080P. The MacBook Pro 17" uses either a 1680*1050 (worse than 1080P) or a 1920*1200 (better than 1080P) screen.

So, the MacBook Pro 15" is not "hi-def" but is a pretty good resolution for its screen size. Many would say that 1680*1050 would be better, and I think I would agree, but I use a 1280*800 screen, so really anything higher is something I would appreciate.
 
Anything above 720p vertical lines of resolution is High Definition quality. So yes, all MBP are high def. Even the MB display is HD quality. Just because something is not 1080p does not mean it isn't HD - it just means it is not 1080p HD.
 
Anything above 720p vertical lines of resolution is High Definition quality. So yes, all MBP are high def. Even the MB display is HD quality. Just because something is not 1080p does not mean it isn't HD - it just means it is not 1080p HD.
Exactly.

The only reason to make it so complicated is to make more money off of uneducated consumers under the guise of a faster transition.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.