Does the Nano have a better screen than the Classic?

Discussion in 'iPod' started by Chrismcfall, Sep 10, 2007.

  1. Chrismcfall macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    #1
    Just wanted to know. Which one would be the better looking?
    Cheers:)
     
  2. psychofreak Retired

    psychofreak

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Location:
    London
    #2
    The Classic's screen is bigger, but as the Nano's screen has the same number of pixels as the 5.5G, and I don't think the resolution hase changed, they both display the same number of pixels.
     
  3. maccam macrumors 6502a

    maccam

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    #3
    Yes, the nano has the same number of pixels plus the same resolution (320 x 240) as the classic.
     
  4. Chrismcfall thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
  5. storage macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    #5
    I would think the nano display looks better, since it has higher pixel density.
     
  6. maccam macrumors 6502a

    maccam

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    #6
    That I do not know, I would say there the same.
     
  7. Chrismcfall thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    #7
    Aha thanks:) Well anything beats my 1GB Nano.

    Oh..And will a 80gig 5.5G case fit a Classic ok?
     
  8. maccam macrumors 6502a

    maccam

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    #8
    Ah sorry for the question here, but I didn't want to make another topic.
    How do I transfer pictures to my ipod?

    EDIT: GOT IT!
     

Share This Page