Any comments on this
article from PC Magazine?
Yeah, I guess he had to play devils advocate to get a paycheck. However, it seems as thought he is missing a few things.
"I'd go as far as to say that anyone who really wanted an iPhone already has one."
No, I waited for the second revision just to see how the iphone would pan out, and it seems as though the iphone is really a contender. Also he misses the point on the price. Frankly, I could not justify the original outlay of money for the original iphone. At $199 it is priced like many other high end phones or for less. The monthly bill on my plan just did not go up much.
"The iPhone 3G is AT&T only"
So what. I was already on AT&T and I have had choices to go to Verizon and Tmobile and didn't. Sure it may be nice to choose whatever provider you can, however MANY phones are provider specific.
"The iPhone 3G's battery life is going to suck."
I guess this is subjective depending on what you do all day on your phone. I already have been in the habit of charging my current cell phone nightly like many people, so not sure if this is relevant and my current cell phone doesn't do 35% of what my iphone does.
In closing for many people the iphone brings the same ease of use that the mac computers do. Frankly, the voicemail features alone are worth the price of the phone to me and the address book and ical syncs have been a life saver.
Like many other naysayers, he just misses the point of a product that is well designed and just works right.
