He said Elliot could not be worse off at this point in school discipline than if he had taken the knife to school intentionally, kept it with him in school where it could pose a risk and just happened to get caught.
"What's the incentive?" Newman said of students who want to do the right thing.
QCassidy352 said:The stupidity here is just stunning. This is why "zero tolerance" makes zero sense.![]()
MacFan782040 said:Wow, no people have common sense anymore. I'd like to give that principle a piece of my mind![]()
Say, that bulletin board software looks familiar!mintlivedotcom said:What the locals are saying: http://www2.indystar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144248
Nice, huh?This principal needs to be reprimanded. He became principal a couple years ago and has been on a suspension rampage ever since. If you read the rules for discipline at this school (I forget the actual name of the document), there are steps that the school is suppose to take. However, there is a clause that states the school can pass all the steps and go straight to suspension. Jimmy Meadows always goes straight to suspension.
My daughter fell into this same trap. She was a National Junior Honor Society student. Straight A student. No history of any wrong doing. On a school bus trip, somebody tried to steel her backpack. The person kicked her and she swung her foot back at the person. Somebody reported the incident and my daughter told the truth about what happened. Because she 'kicked back' (even though there was no contact), she was suspended. She was kicked out of the NJHS, was denied graduation ceremony rights and all other after school activities.
No one is arguing the facts. He brought a knife to school.
What they are arguing about is the poor judgement of all involved...student, parents, administrators.
The student made an error in judgement. He should have thrown the weapon away or taken it home.
The parents made an error in judgement by suing the school. They are guaranteeing expulsion now.
The administrators made an error in judgement by in not taking into account the circumstances surrounding the disclosure of the weapon in the student's possession. The issue is moot now. There is no reason for a court to overturn the decision...the policy is clear.
Lesson learned? Schools and airports are no places for weapons of any kind.
Wand your kids before they board the bus!
Abstract said:I just wrote an email to the principal.
It was a well written email except at the end, where I briefly mentioned the "jawdropping stupidity" he just displayed as principal.![]()
Jesus said:http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060404/LOCAL/60404029we can all learn from this incident and in the future apply some common sense when interpreting rules