Discussion in 'Apple Watch' started by eish2306, Oct 1, 2018.

  1. eish2306 macrumors regular


    Apr 30, 2013
    with the increased screen size - has anyone else gone from 42 to 40 instead of going up to 44?
  2. ray737 macrumors 6502

    Sep 11, 2014
  3. no1gooner macrumors newbie


    Sep 19, 2016
    Yes I did, went from a 42mm series 3 to a 40mm series 4 and am very pleased with the overall look and fit, the old 38mm was that bit to small so went with the old 42mm which was ok but I’ve found the new 40mm to be the perfect size for my slim wrists.
  4. Jason Hensley macrumors 6502a

    Jason Hensley

    Jun 6, 2018
    I went from 42 to 44, but it was an actual decision to ponder on this time for me. The 44 does fit better than I expected with how slim the S4's are.
  5. Soordhin macrumors member

    Apr 13, 2010
    Berlin, Germany
    I'm really pondering this issue. I ordered a 44 coming from a 42 SS Series 0, so it won't be any slimmer, but it will be slightly larger and i have really small wrists. But since i had a budget for a ceramic version which is not available i might simply get a 40 additionally. As there seems to be a supply shortage for all models (ordered right after the new watch was available, delivery 2nd to 9th october..., current order would be November), i might have to wait a bit though to compare them.
  6. anthonymoody macrumors 68020


    Aug 8, 2002
    Honestly? The S4 form factor increase is barely noticeable. Side by side? Sure. You see it But even then not dramatic.

    But the screen size increase is massive and obvious every time you see it.

    Unless the 42 felt too big I wouldn’t drop down in size. At least try a 44 and drool on the screen before you decide...
  7. Mercenary macrumors 65816


    Sep 17, 2012
    I'm seeing a lot of photos in the show off your watch thread and thinking "Nope! The 44 is clearly too big for you".
  8. anthonymoody macrumors 68020


    Aug 8, 2002
    Make sure you're not swayed by the close up pictures which, because of photography blah blah blah, distort the heck out the proportions. Look more at the ones further back, where you can see a bunch of forearm...not just a close up of a watch on a wrist.
  9. Lobwedgephil macrumors 601


    Apr 7, 2012
    Can't imagine going smaller and I have small wrists. Once you see the 44 display on your wrists, impossible to go smaller to me.
  10. deeddawg macrumors 604

    Jun 14, 2010
    Agreed. On paper it's about 1.5mm wider and 1.6mm taller. The thickness of a US penny.

    Looking at the S4 vs my S3 in the store I found it difficult to discern the difference without lining them up side by side and specifically looking for it. Trying it on, I couldn't really see much difference.

    I doubt anyone would ever notice whether someone was wearing an S3 42mm or S4 44mm from size alone. Screen, crown, and corner shape would be the telltales.
  11. Mabus51 macrumors 65816

    Aug 16, 2007
    If the watch lugs hang past your wrist it’s to big. A lot of pictures on the 44mm thread showing it off clearly don’t understand this or care about watch etiquette. There are some that it works for but not everyone.
  12. deeddawg macrumors 604

    Jun 14, 2010
    Admittedly I haven't perused that thread, but there are folks with wrists less than 44mm wide wearing this watch?
  13. 19SK91 macrumors regular

    Aug 4, 2014
    I‘ve downgraded from 42mm to 40mm and couldn‘t be happier.
  14. deeddawg, Oct 2, 2018
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2018

    deeddawg macrumors 604

    Jun 14, 2010
    Here's a quick example of near vs far. Same S3 and same ugly wrist. Phone camera close vs further away (image cropped).

    IMG_6431.jpg IMG_6434.jpg
  15. Mabus51 macrumors 65816

    Aug 16, 2007
    Lugs don’t hang past your wrist. Looks good!
  16. edhchoe macrumors 6502a


    Oct 28, 2011
  17. Nozuka macrumors 68020

    Jul 3, 2012
    the 40mm screen already looks big to me. not sure why i would need it any bigger. and the watch faces have the same amount of information on both of the sizes.

    i would definitely choose style over screen size on this one. take the one you think looks the best on you.
    everyone else will see you with the screen turned off 99% of the time.
  18. 1sazim macrumors member

    Sep 21, 2014
    I went from 42 to 40 and have returned that and ordered the 44! After having the 42mm for my Series 0 and Series 3, it just looked too small on my arm.
  19. Wildgift macrumors 6502


    Sep 21, 2007
  20. Sword86 macrumors regular

    Oct 6, 2012
    I was going to an S4 regardless. I felt immediately the 44 was simply too large for me and went with a 40. Took me mere seconds to decide. The 40 just sits in a ‘pocket’ on my wrist. I think my wrist measures 7.5 inches.
    It’s only fair I qualify this however, ...I dislike watches I deem too large. To each their own.
    My understanding is the display on the new 40 is larger than that of the previous 42. I had an S2 42 for awhile and never felt the display was too small. I’m blind as a bat without reading glasses on so I didn’t think the 44 was going to eliminate my issue. S
  21. Rclewen macrumors newbie


    May 8, 2010
    Batavia, IL
    My wrist is about the same and I thought about going with a 40, but then I remembered the dozen or so 42mm watch bands sitting on my dresser ;) 44mm SB GPS arrives tommorrow :)

Share This Page

20 October 1, 2018