Doesn't seem like that big a deal. It's not like Dropbox will noticeably run faster natively. It's a background app or the most part. You can be sure they will write a native version eventually if they start losing subscribers. Realistically they have until Apple drops support for Rosetta 2, which according to Apple is not very soon. When they transitioned to Intel in the 2000s Rosetta support lasted about 5 years.
Exactly. This exact same post could slug in probably near-countless other software names right now. There's LOTS of stuff that has not gone M-native yet. And that will likely persist while Rosetta persists... with some never bothering to make the change.
Are we forgetting how things went with Rosetta 1? It was
YEARS for even some pretty mainstream apps to fully make the change. I still keep one old Mac running Snow Leopard to have access to one key program (and a few non-key-but-nice others) that never made the leap.
Expectations should not be different this time. I know some of us were thoroughly lying to the rest with the "just flip one switch in a compiler" nonsense slung when M-silicon was revealed but if it was that easy, everything would have been M-native within a matter of days. It's not. Why not? Apparently that switch is HEAVY or very hard to find in the compiler.
Instead, there's generally lots of work to be done and tested. And the Mac market is probably still overwhelmingly Intel Macs. And those who already have software like this will really gripe if companies seek to charge more for the work they have to do to re-code for M-series... so time spent re-coding is just business expense without much new ROI for many of these companies- especially utility software like this. Who is willing to pay for a new M-series Dropbox upgrade? And how much? Programming is not free you know.
Dropbox will get there when they feel it in their corporate pocketbook... or can anticipate that impact soon if they don't get with it.
The same will be true for so many other apps not yet re-coded/evolved to also be M-series native.
Those most passionate about this should encourage Apple to shut down Rosetta 2 ASAP. That would "force" those interested in this market to evolve their software... or just let this relatively tiny little segment go. What happened with Rosetta 1? Certain pretty useful apps were not evolved and ceased to function when Rosetta 1 was removed. Why didn't those get updated? Probably because there was not enough money in it to evolve them.
Is there enough money in Dropbox allocating resources to do this right now? Probably not. Else, they would. They are basically seeking tangible votes to show there is enough demand to go to their bosses and get their bosses to spend the money on the project for what will likely be no tangible return in the near-term.
Dropbox is a useful, simple, free,
cross-platform service that "just works" and barely more than 10 year ago, Steve Jobs himself sat down with this company wanting to buy them and offering what was rumored to be up to $800M for them. Apparently Jobs saw something in Dropbox to be willing to offer so much for them. We should not be so quick to fault them for having a still fully functional app working just fine but not a M-series native version yet.
Else, MacRumors could recycle this article every day and just change the app name. There's PLENTY of them.