Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I uninstalled the Dropbox client and cancelled my paid plan when I noticed one of their processes was making calls out any time I used QuickTime Player to open any file (regardless of the file location). Still don't have a good replacement though.
How did you find this out?

Also, what's wrong with iCloud Drive?
 
I'm not being snarky here, I legit don't understand why anybody cares about this. How much work does the app actually do, that running it via Rosetta is such a big no-no.

3 reasons this is an issue:
  1. Running it under Rosetta makes it hog system resources (memory, CPU) that the Intel native version doesn't.
  2. Rosetta is a stop-gap emulation layer to ease the transition from Intel to Apple silicon. At some point in the not-too-distance future, Rosetta will go away.
  3. Apple Silicon is the future of the Mac platform. Acting like it's no big deal is lazy/tone-deaf/disrespectful/incompetent* (delete as appropriate)
 
Is this true? Why would Apple drop support for x86 applications? I think it's pretty cool what they have with Rosetta2, why not leave it as a feature?
Eventually it will just be unnecessary baggage. It reaches a point where only old neglected software still requires it and so best to drop support eventually.
 
I'd happily spend the Dropbox money with Apple but fact is, their business offering is incredibly poor. Sharing options and live working files are difficult and multi user control is basically non existent. They don't even offer an annual subscription, only monthly.

I have spoken to my Apple Business Manager countless times on this and all they do is apologise and say "maybe at some point in the future".

The Dropbox situation is not ideal but quite honestly I haven't had any issue with any our of M1 Macs using Dropbox, and there is not currently a better option out there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nebojsak
Maybe I’m being a bit slow here. But iCloud isn’t a Dropbox substitute as far as I understand it. DB is a separate storage location whereas iCloud seems to want to back everything up onto the Mac which is incredibly annoying, especially with the price Apple charge for SSD storage. So for those who are saying they will switch to iCloud, will this really give you what you want?
 
I haven't read all 7 pages of this thread but in case no one else has mentioned it yet, you can switch to Maestral which is an open source Dropbox client and is also native to Apple silicon. Works quite well as expected, I use it every day.
 
Maybe I’m being a bit slow here. But iCloud isn’t a Dropbox substitute as far as I understand it. DB is a separate storage location whereas iCloud seems to want to back everything up onto the Mac which is incredibly annoying, especially with the price Apple charge for SSD storage. So for those who are saying they will switch to iCloud, will this really give you what you want?
Google Drive, OneDrive are a better replacement. Much much better than Dropbox in many situations.
I've seen Rosetta2 Dropbox eats up to 1GB of RAM and remember on your M1 , sometimes all you have is 8GB.
 
I used to love Dropbox. I’ve found their changes over the last few years to be very user-unfriendly and backwards, much like my experience with 1Password. Both services I use less and less accordingly, and I’ll likely phase them out to better solutions soon.
Both products suffer from the same issue - they really are traditionally more features than standalone products.

So both are being driven to pursue different markets for growth - in particular creating products they can sell for broad seat coverage in corporate accounts.

This is also why both apps have moved to Electron - because they have/are going to need to greatly increase their feature-sets to sell into these markets, and don't feel they can afford to if they are doing native apps for each platform.
 
But your Dropbox software still serves its purpose whether it's written for AArch64 or x86-64.

I mean, let's say they take the effort to make it native, what's the benefit to the consumer?

It shouldn't be an "effort", something like supporting a different arc or new version of an OS is what decides if a SW is maintained or not.

If Dropbox want to mark their product as "obsolete abondonware" ..... thats fine by me.
 
Everyone keeps saying there's no replacement for Dropbox? Why?
One Drive, Google Drive, iCloud Drive. What are the differences in what they do?
 
They will definitely support natively Dropbox in the future. It might not be worth it now, but in a few years when the majority of active mac users will be on Apple silicon, Dropbox will not be able to ignore them. To be honest they are lazy, but I don’t think they want to sacrifice their Apple users market
But in the meantime, they are going to continue to lose Mac customers. By the time they fix this, they may have a lot less customers than they do now.
 
Wow. How heavy is that "one switch in the compiler" (to make all Mac apps native)? ;)
Dropbox uses a KEXT to run as a system service so they can intercept the file operations to know what has changed.

Apple is deprecating KEXTs and moving apps to a new system. It requires users to install it by disabling security settings, rebooting, installing the app, then rebooting then reenabling security settings. that is going to complicate things significantly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko
How did you find this out?

Also, what's wrong with iCloud Drive?
I have not yet worked out how I can post a link to a file and let people download it - without revealing my identity.

Yes, I think I could change my AppleID details but I really don't want to go messing with them.
 
What a blunder for DropBox ...

I stopped using them probably a decade ago when I ran into the cap and had mac issues.
Setup my personal cloud with a NAS, and have not looked back.
Unlimited file syncing, between 4 systems and 3 platforms, access from phone and tablet, no slow internet needed.
 
Yeah I moved off dropbox after they forcibly changed my plan from 1TB to 2TB and made me pay more even though I didn't need more space. Kinda silly not to consider M1 support or even just say "it's in development" at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: polyphenol
Cool. I was looking for an excuse to move everything on Dropbox over to Google Drive.
I went TO Dropbox after the mess Google made out of Drive on the Mac. SMB mounts from localhost? Come on, can they be any more clueless? OneDrive isn't even a consideration so there's really no other choice unless you want to stand something up on your own.

I'm planning on checking out Maestral, I just haven't had the time.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: xpxp2002
I switched to the Maestral Dropbox client which runs natively on Silicon, and it’s been great: https://maestral.app/
I learned about the Dropbox M1 support issue when I received my MacBook Pro Tuesday. Tried Maestral and found it to be a bit clunky and it was kicking out errors as it seems to have issues with some file names.

Decided it wasn't worth it and switched my files to iCloud since I already have a family plan. iCloud doesn't have all the bells and whistles, but I can't justify paying Dropbox when they do not have a native client.

iCloud has worked great. Bye Dropbox (after many years)
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko
this is reminiscent of the time when Facebook insisted HTML5 was the future and neglected to develop a native iOS app.... then we got a native app. Facebook also said it would never make an iPad app... then we got that too.

Dropbox will switch over also, no doubt, just an odd denial phase.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.