DrGruv1 said:any others waitting for 3.0ghz or are you going rev. b?
can't decide, still using an old 733h, maybe we'll get the 3.0ghz now! (probably no, but still would be great)
ryanw said:I get upset everytime I see apple release more hardware with no options for 4 or 8 way systems. Apple has made things very modular to make systems either one cpu or dual cpu systems. They should look at how Sun Microsystems has made their 420R systems VERY flexible to be anything from 1 cpu to 4cpu systems. COMEON APPLE! What's holding you back from making a powermac where you can order it as a 1CPU system. And then order a 2nd CPU for it later or a 3rd, or a 4th. Upgrade ON DEMAND instead of having to buy a whole new system.
Apple could price the CPU modules high enough to where the price of buying a 4 way system out of the gate would be much cheaper than buying the individual modules after the original order.
carletonmusic said:they really don't need to update the displays. price-drop maybe, but the specs of the display aren't likely to change. Unless it's just a form "upgrade"
hayesk said:Aside from the styling, why does Apple *need* to update the displays?
DrGruv1 said:any others waitting for 3.0ghz or are you going rev. b?
Namacste said:What sweet, sweet timing!
Somehow I don't think the new form factor will match the artist's rendering. Too blasé. Too predictable. I think it will incorporate the grille aesthetic from the PB and front of the G5PM. Sort of a homage to late 60s sport cars.
legion said:As for styling, the fact that the current displays have huge bezels and are not height adjustable is a sore point for such expensive displays. Running a multi-monitor system, those bezels make spanning a desktop a really inelegant solution.
Do you think Apple is misleading about the viewing angle of their displays? I've experimented with my iMac's display and found that the viewing angle isn't all it's cracked up to be (it's less than the 170 degrees Apple states).Namacste said:Oh, and of course we should hope for better contrast ratio, adjustables, viewing angle and all that good stuff.
legion said:The screens themselves are pretty bad compared to the Sonys in the same price range. They have poor contrast ratio and brightness. Viewing angles are also less than impressive.
The current displays are tiltable... as in, they can be tilted up (by pushing back on the top of the display -- the back leg is spring-loaded and folds out ... it's a little awkward, but it works).montecristo said:I've heard several people complain about the lack of adjustability, not only for this artist's rendition, but also for the existing displays. I have a laptop so I don't have a separate cinema display, but isn't the third leg in the back adjustable, so you can change the viewing angle? Can someone clarify what they expect from an "adjustable" display?
As for the timing of the release, my guess is that they probably had these displays ready, but have been waiting for the joint release with the upgraded powermacs. My credit card is waiting....
DrGruv1 said:any others waitting for 3.0ghz or are you going rev. b?
can't decide, still using an old 733hz, maybe we'll get the 3.0ghz now! (probably not, but still would be great!)![]()
g30ffr3y said:also it would be nice if they gave you the wireless mouse and keyboard... at least the 3000.00 for the top of the line shouldnt nickle and dime you for wireless...