Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Mind PM'ing me about that?
I'd love to know which you are using.
I’m using Control D, “Full Control” plan.
With that plan you can “redirect” any site/services to another country.
For YouTube usually is Albania.
Yep, this is what I'm using too. It's pretty neat. I also use it to watch region locked shows from the UK (BBC) and Canada (CTV).
 
I’m using Control D, “Full Control” plan.
With that plan you can “redirect” any site/services to another country.
For YouTube usually is Albania.

Yep, this is what I'm using too. It's pretty neat. I also use it to watch region locked shows from the UK (BBC) and Canada (CTV).

Good service, the only gap (fairly small) I don’t like is the request to load the tracker is still made from your device to begin with, even if it’s denied by the service and never makes it to the pixel provider.
 
I just installed DDG. Not sure it’s any more useful than Brave, which I’ve been using for a while. I’ll play around with it some more.
 
Testing this now ... does one just pick the YouTube "service"?
We’re way too out of topic. 😅
Anyway, I’m not sure about what you meant.
Here a screenshot of one of my profiles (you can assign one profile to multiple endpoints):
IMG_0142.jpeg
 
Thank you! That's just the phase I'm at here.

When one does that redirection, do I have to pick a certain region (one that has no AD monetization?)
Exactly.
As in my screenshot you click on the circle on the right and then you choose the country for that “service”.
 
I trust Google more than Brave.

Brave is nothing more than a Crypto / Ai / VPN Subscription Bloat browser these days.
Really, can you point me to some sources for this? I mean, there is the incredibly easy to disable menu bar buttons, but other than that? Is there something nefarious going on that would require me to switch?
 
  • Like
Reactions: sparkles3020
In a better timeline this would be a native feature to Safari.

Would be nice.

We’re way too out of topic. 😅
Anyway, I’m not sure about what you meant.
Here a screenshot of one of my profiles (you can assign one profile to multiple endpoints):
View attachment 2644281

Controld, as good of a service it is, it still has a loose privacy and terms that could allow it to use your data. So that’s the last piece of the puzzle you should plug by preventing the request from hitting controld. You can limit some of that analytics usages by restricting data sharing, but they still need to respond to the jurisdictional demands of the country you’re “touching” on your way to Google.

But it doesn’t look like their website has any major third-party issue.

IMG_3419.jpeg
 
Would be nice.



Controld, as good of a service it is, it still has a loose privacy and terms that could allow it to use your data. So that’s the last piece of the puzzle you should plug by preventing the request from hitting controld. You can limit some of that analytics usages by restricting data sharing, but they still need to respond to the jurisdictional demands of the country you’re “touching” on your way to Google.

But it doesn’t look like their website has any major third-party issue.

View attachment 2644300
Fun enough, I can use Control D to block… Control D!
IMG_0143.png
 
Fun enough, I can use Control D to block… Control D!
View attachment 2644303

Haha, nice! A snake eating itself. But it still doesn’t stop the initial request from arriving at their server in the first place. So if you go to macrumors.com, you’re still sending a request to controld to for example s.skimresoures.com, controld knows the request is s.skimresources.com and blocks it. That’s great, but that request still left your device and still made it all the way to controld. But an extension that sees it in the browser can stop it from ever being requested by your device in the first place, so controld only sees you requested “macrumors.com”

There are others and depending on the platform, Firewalla, Little Snitch and NopeTracker, along with controld and or a VPN would be a lot of fail safe… add a bunker for that final touch. Haha
 
Last edited:
Haha, nice! A snake eating itself. But it still doesn’t stop the initial request from arriving at their server in the first place. So if you go to macrumors.com, you’re still sending a request to controld to for example s.skimresoures.com, controld knows the request is s.skimresources.com and blocks it. That’s great, but that request still left your device and still made it all the way to controld. But an extension that sees it in the browser can stop it from ever being requested by your device in the first place, so controld only sees you requested “macrumors.com”
That’s true, but of course I use some extensions in my browser so that many requests are blocked before they leave my devices.
For those without a browser (Apple TV, IoT devices, etc) there’s no solution, except for a self-hosted solution like pi-hole or similar.
Services like Control D (or NextDNS) are easier but obviously there are trade offs.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Graphate
Since YouTube offers an ad-free subscription, how is bypassing ads not the same as piracy? I'm guessing many here are against torrenting movies for free instead of paying, but are OK with watching YT videos without ads, without paying?
I think a lot fewer people would block ads if those ads weren't intrusive, obnoxious, too long, interrupted the video in ways that cause you to lose your train of thought, etc. YouTube videos vary in these behaviors, with some not being all that annoying, especially the ads built into some videos, in which the YouTubers themselves present the ad and often manage to make it at least partly relevant to the content of the video. This is the type of YouTube ad I sometimes watch. But too many ads on too many other websites are literally out of control, so a general ad blocker that works on YouTube as well as other sites is often the preferred option. Too many advertisers bring this on themselves.
 
Last edited:
When I've found podcasts that use AD tech like this, I've unsubbed ASAP.

I will usually tolerate ADs in Podcasts and listen through them if they are well done and smartly integrated.

When the Show doesn't care and lets them programmatically get dropped right in the middle of dialogue, I'm out.

If they care that little -- so do I.
It’s called “professionalism” and it’s something all of these tech companies can learn from traditional media.
 
It’s called “professionalism” and it’s something all of these tech companies can learn from traditional media.

100%

When they put out a product/experience that I assume they themselves would not enjoy (like ADs in the middle of a sentence), they really give up the game.

They all just want the money, without putting in the care & effort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsawyercjs
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.