• Did you order new AirTags? We've opened a dedicated AirTags forum.

Kendo

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Apr 4, 2011
2,227
685
I understand the iPod touch has an older generation A series chip, but fundamentally the iPod touch and iPhone are the same aluminum build with a retina touch screen display. Yes the iPhone has more premium materials, and an LTE chip, but does that warrant a $400 increase in price? Wouldn't a $150 increase be more reasonable so that the iPhone costs $400 total and not $650?

This isn't limited to iPhones, most smartphones are the same crazy prices. But do they simply charge so much because they can? Similar to a $5 hot dog at a baseball game when you can get them for $1 anywhere else?

I just don't understand how these phones cost the same as a MacBook Air?
 

Zxxv

macrumors 68040
Nov 13, 2011
3,558
1,103
UK
Used to be less of a price difference. Do some googling you'll see.
 
Comment

talmy

macrumors 601
Oct 26, 2009
4,721
277
Oregon
This isn't limited to iPhones, most smartphones are the same crazy prices. But do they simply charge so much because they can?

Yes. First rule (?) of business -- you set the price to maximize profits. Manufacturing cost has surprising little to do with it. If the price is above the optimum, sales fall off and overall profits drop. If the price is below the optimum, sales increase but the profit per unit drops and overall profits drop.

So the iPhone is $650 because they can set that high a price and still sell 10 million the first weekend. Since it is supply constrained, if they sold it for less, that would just mean lower profits -- drop the price $100 and they've just lost a billion dollars!
 
Comment

antiprotest

macrumors 68000
Apr 19, 2010
1,514
615
Dumb question but if an iPod touch is $250...why is an iPhone $650?

whats the cost to make an iPod?



I read the iPhone was $229


Of course It would end up costing Apple much much more than that with R & D, manufacturing, salaries, marketing, etc etc. The profit margin might not be nearly as high as some people think. They just sell a lot of them.
 
Comment

Ramio

macrumors 6502a
Sep 13, 2011
919
2
Houston, TeXas
Of course It would end up costing Apple much much more than that with R & D, manufacturing, salaries, marketing, etc etc. The profit margin might not be nearly as high as some people think. They just sell a lot of them.

Actually with the billions in cash money they have, I think they're making a killing.
 
Comment

geoffm33

macrumors 6502
Dec 27, 2010
308
145
I understand the iPod touch has an older generation A series chip, but fundamentally the iPod touch and iPhone are the same aluminum build with a retina touch screen display. Yes the iPhone has more premium materials, and an LTE chip, but does that warrant a $400 increase in price? Wouldn't a $150 increase be more reasonable so that the iPhone costs $400 total and not $650?

This isn't limited to iPhones, most smartphones are the same crazy prices. But do they simply charge so much because they can? Similar to a $5 hot dog at a baseball game when you can get them for $1 anywhere else?

I just don't understand how these phones cost the same as a MacBook Air?

A phones (or any consumer electronic products) cost is not a direct relationship to the cost of the internal components. In addition to the additional components, there is far more engineering to fit it all in the same form factor. Then there is the cost of research and development, marketing, distribution, etc that is greater for an iPhone release than an iPod.
 
Comment

jkozlow3

macrumors 6502a
Jul 16, 2008
909
544
Because they can.

I agree that this probably has more to do with it than anything. Because they can.

Realistically, the iPhone probably has something like a $20-30 higher component cost than the iPod Touch to account for the cellular radios, etc. I'm certain that Apple doesn't have to pay very much for the components with the volume that they purchase. As a result, Apple's "real" cost to build these phones is probably much lower than the numbers that get thrown around from time to time.
 
Comment

antiprotest

macrumors 68000
Apr 19, 2010
1,514
615
Dumb question but if an iPod touch is $250...why is an iPhone $650?

Actually with the billions in cash money they have, I think they're making a killing.


This is irrelevant to what I said.

Of course they are making huge total profits, but not because of huge margin per unit, but margin plus volume.

I've seen some who talk about this as if

Price - Cost of materials = Profits (thus Apple must be super greedy for charging so much per unit)

Not true.
 
Comment

bmms8

macrumors 68020
Dec 19, 2007
2,484
105
Of course It would end up costing Apple much much more than that with R & D, manufacturing, salaries, marketing, etc etc. The profit margin might not be nearly as high as some people think. They just sell a lot of them.

I agree 100%

Margins aren't as high as people think. They make so much on services like App Store and healthy profits on hardware too, but not at the high margins people think by reading articles like this.
 
Comment

antiprotest

macrumors 68000
Apr 19, 2010
1,514
615
I agree that this probably has more to do with it than anything. Because they can.



Realistically, the iPhone probably has something like a $20-30 higher component cost than the iPod Touch to account for the cellular radios, etc. I'm certain that Apple doesn't have to pay very much for the components with the volume that they purchase. As a result, Apple's "real" cost to build these phones is probably much lower than the numbers that get thrown around from time to time.


I am guessing that iPod Touch benefits from the R & D for iPhone. And it received much less marketing. Thus lower cost to Apple and priced lower.

----------

Pricing is based on what the market will bear, not the costs of the items.


But it must be based partly on the cost because it will almost never be priced below cost, and that cost would include costs far beyond the cost of materials. Then it would be priced beyond that to as high as people will pay.
 
Comment

cfedu

Suspended
Mar 8, 2009
1,166
1,566
Toronto
I understand the iPod touch has an older generation A series chip, but fundamentally the iPod touch and iPhone are the same aluminum build with a retina touch screen display. Yes the iPhone has more premium materials, and an LTE chip, but does that warrant a $400 increase in price? Wouldn't a $150 increase be more reasonable so that the iPhone costs $400 total and not $650?

This isn't limited to iPhones, most smartphones are the same crazy prices. But do they simply charge so much because they can? Similar to a $5 hot dog at a baseball game when you can get them for $1 anywhere else?

I just don't understand how these phones cost the same as a MacBook Air?

Simply answer is,

Because then can.


The BOM of the iPad is more than the iphone. The market dictates what the sell for. If people stopped buying iPhones, apple would reduce their price.
 
Comment

mnsportsgeek

macrumors 68040
Feb 24, 2009
3,081
3,653
Actually with the billions in cash money they have, I think they're making a killing.

You can sell 10 million water bottles and make a killing. The profit margin has little to do with them making a "killing"
 
Comment

joeblow7777

macrumors 604
Sep 7, 2010
6,731
8,010
The price discrepancy is even more puzzling when you compare smart phones to tablets with similar specs. Why does an iPad Mini Retina with cellular cost so much less than an iPhone 5s with basically the same internals if you buy it off contract?

The only reasons I can think of is to encourage people to buy in contract so that the carriers get a cut, and simply because they can get away with it.
 
Comment

andyw715

macrumors 65816
Oct 25, 2013
1,291
728
Dumb question but if an iPod touch is $250...why is an iPhone $650?

Allot has to do with the current subscription model of the carriers. Subsided phones.
Once more people go to as NEXT type plan our whatever Verizon offers maybe the price will go down.

Cellular and gps are a149$ option to an iPad.
Is that the big difference between a iPhone and iPod?
 
Comment

deeddawg

macrumors G4
Jun 14, 2010
10,997
4,774
US
Don't get suckered into a simplistic view of product pricing.

With non-commoditized products, manufacturers charge what the market will bear. People already line up to pay the prices asked. Apple would be stupid, and going against its shareholders best interests, to not charge what people are willing to pay.
 
Comment

alent1234

macrumors 603
Jun 19, 2009
5,688
170
iphones carry a higher patent licensing cost, more testing, certification, capital expenses to buy the new manufacturing machinery.

ipods are like the iphone 5C, not the 6
 
Comment

frankdogg

macrumors 6502
Mar 24, 2011
325
165
Mid-Wilshire LA
cause people gotta get paid, departments need to continue their R&D and stay funded, people gotta get paid some more, and other stuff.

and someone said earlier that the iPod touch benefits from iPhone R&D (probably true) and all of the other stuff that goes into the iPhone that distinguishes it from an iPod touch.
 
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.